you Brits are f***ed

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
aghasee wrote:
> http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0111/p01s01-woeu.html?s=itm
>
> <quote>
>
> In regional trial runs, the number of arrests per officer shot up from
> around 10 per year to 100 per year. Convictions also increased.
>
> </quote>
>
>


So what's new? They've been doing this for ages on the motorways.

Can only be a good thing. Nothing to fear, nothing to hide.
 
aghasee wrote:
> <quote>
>
> In regional trial runs, the number of arrests per officer shot up from
> around 10 per year to 100 per year. Convictions also increased.
>
> </quote>


You have a point, also made in the article. The potential intrusion into
civil liberty should not be taken lightly. The State cannot be relied upon
to be benign or benevolent. Power actually can corrupt.

Huw


 

"Huw" wrote...
> aghasee wrote:
>> <quote>
>>
>> In regional trial runs, the number of arrests per officer shot up from
>> around 10 per year to 100 per year. Convictions also increased.
>>
>> </quote>

>
> You have a point, also made in the article. The potential intrusion into
> civil liberty should not be taken lightly. The State cannot be relied upon
> to be benign or benevolent. Power actually can corrupt.
>


Well said.

Once again, like guns, what will happen is that the law abiding will be
penalised, lose liberty, but the villains will simply find a way around it.
False, or more accurately, cloned numberplates are an obvious way round the
new system and are extensively in use already from what I've read. How long
before an innocent person gets arrested for a crime because his cloned
numberplate has been registered by a camera at a crime scene?

My recent dealings with a member of the Police over my stolen 90 don't fill
me with joy regarding their attitude. A SOCO who's first comment to me on
the phone when the 90 was found was "glad to see your tyre depth is OK"
obviously hasn't got her priorities in order in my book and certainly has no
conception of customer service. When she's also not interested in a list of
the tools stolen with the vehicle one does question what her job description
actually covers.
--
Regards
Bob
In Runnymede, 17 miles West of London


 
aghasee <[email protected]> uttered summat worrerz funny about:
> http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0111/p01s01-woeu.html?s=itm
>
> <quote>
>
> In regional trial runs, the number of arrests per officer shot up from
> around 10 per year to 100 per year. Convictions also increased.
>
> </quote>


If there was a bobby on my shift only churning out 10 arrests a year then
there would be some serious questions being asked even without such
technology. I wouldn't ask an officer to lock up 100 crooks if I hadn't done
it myself in a year. In the main I may add for "Priority" Crime. To those
less in the know thats the likes of burglars and drug dealers.

10 Arrests...pah!

Lee D


 
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:30:59 +0000, Tim Hobbs <[email protected]> wrote:

>We are going to catch ten times more criminals.
>
>That's terrible...


It's easier to create 10 times more criminals that are easier to catch
than go after 10 times more currently adept at not getting caught
criminals.


--
"We have gone from a world of concentrated knowledge and wisdom to one
of distributed ignorance. And we know and understand less while being
increasingly capable." Prof. Peter Cochrane, formerly of BT Labs
In memory of Brian {Hamilton Kelly} who logged off 15th September 2005
 
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:39:52 -0000, "Huw"
<hedydd[nospam]@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

>You have a point, also made in the article. The potential intrusion into
>civil liberty should not be taken lightly. The State cannot be relied upon
>to be benign or benevolent. Power actually can corrupt.


The real 'problem' in the UK is the attitude that we must legislate
for everything. Anything hits the press, the Government response is
almost certainly going to be something along the lines of "we will
introduce legislation to"...

Now, nothing per-se wrong with tackling the effect, but little is
being done to tackle the cause.

If anything, we've moved substantially to a culture of immediate
guilt, where innocence has to be proved.


--
"We have gone from a world of concentrated knowledge and wisdom to one
of distributed ignorance. And we know and understand less while being
increasingly capable." Prof. Peter Cochrane, formerly of BT Labs
In memory of Brian {Hamilton Kelly} who logged off 15th September 2005
 
The real problem is the number of ****s (and many obviously drive Land
Rovers judging by some of the responses here) to this very serious matter of
loss of civil liberty. Why did we bother with the 2nd German war? We are now
getting the Nazi style government by general consent!!!
Wake up and smell the jack boots!!!


 
On 2006-01-12, Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote:

> If anything, we've moved substantially to a culture of immediate
> guilt, where innocence has to be proved.


... and more towards a scheme where not only is the above true, but
guilt is assigned by automated camera-based systems reading easily
faked ID tags. The innocent-have-nothing-to-fear brigade are way off
the mark on this one.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
 
Matthew Maddock wrote:
> aghasee wrote:
>> http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0111/p01s01-woeu.html?s=itm
>>
>> <quote>
>>
>> In regional trial runs, the number of arrests per officer shot up
>> from around 10 per year to 100 per year. Convictions also increased.
>>
>> </quote>
>>
>>

>
> So what's new? They've been doing this for ages on the motorways.
>
> Can only be a good thing. Nothing to fear, nothing to hide.


Not sure I follow the logic of that last statement.
I fear the sky falling on me, don't think that has any affect on me hiding the
booze from my errant offspring!
I fear (sic) the statement lacks some grammatical necessities before
understanding.

--
"He who says it cannot be done should not interrupt her doing it."

If at first you don't succeed,
maybe skydiving's not for you!


 
In message <[email protected]>
Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:39:52 -0000, "Huw"
> <hedydd[nospam]@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >You have a point, also made in the article. The potential intrusion into
> >civil liberty should not be taken lightly. The State cannot be relied upon
> >to be benign or benevolent. Power actually can corrupt.

>
> The real 'problem' in the UK is the attitude that we must legislate
> for everything. Anything hits the press, the Government response is
> almost certainly going to be something along the lines of "we will
> introduce legislation to"...
>
> Now, nothing per-se wrong with tackling the effect, but little is
> being done to tackle the cause.
>
> If anything, we've moved substantially to a culture of immediate
> guilt, where innocence has to be proved.
>
>


Paricularly if you need to defend yourself......

Richard

--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Boycott the Yorkshire Dales - No Play, No Pay
 
In message <[email protected]>
Ian Rawlings <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2006-01-12, Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote:
>
> > If anything, we've moved substantially to a culture of immediate
> > guilt, where innocence has to be proved.

>
> .. and more towards a scheme where not only is the above true, but
> guilt is assigned by automated camera-based systems reading easily
> faked ID tags. The innocent-have-nothing-to-fear brigade are way off
> the mark on this one.
>


Not if the penalty for faking is *massive*, something like a no-quibble
ten year automatic sentence for false number plates or similar.
It's that faking that needs to be stopped so that the criminal *knows*
they are going to prison even if they have not yet commited the offence
which they were planning.
If their crime was simply avoiding the congestion charge then that's
their problem. I can think of no reason for having false plates
other than to commit *some* offence, likewise using someone else ID,
having someone else's bank details etc etc. Of course there does need
to be common sense applied, unlike Ken and his mates in London where
people in Cheshire get a congestion charge ticket for a vehicle that
does not match the photo (which usally seems to get lost in such
circumstances). Indeed, that is when the camears based systems could
come to the fore - someone in Cheshire cannot be in two places at one
time.

Richard

--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Boycott the Yorkshire Dales - No Play, No Pay
 
In message <[email protected]>
"Peter" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The real problem is the number of ****s (and many obviously drive Land
> Rovers judging by some of the responses here) to this very serious matter of
> loss of civil liberty. Why did we bother with the 2nd German war? We are now
> getting the Nazi style government by general consent!!!
> Wake up and smell the jack boots!!!
>
>


Any point you are trying to make has lost by being abusive.

Richard
--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Boycott the Yorkshire Dales - No Play, No Pay
 
On 2006-01-12, beamendsltd <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not if the penalty for faking is *massive*, something like a
> no-quibble ten year automatic sentence for false number plates or
> similar.


That would be absurd, large sentences for faking a numberplate and
small sentences for killing a person, it wouldn't stack up.

I'm sure this'll bring out comments of "large sentences for killing
should be automatic", plenty of reasons why that shouldn't be the case
and why no civilised country takes that approach.

> It's that faking that needs to be stopped so that the criminal
> *knows* they are going to prison even if they have not yet commited
> the offence which they were planning.


Locking people up because they might be going to commit a crime of a
type you don't know? Now you're *really* talking about a police
state!

> I can think of no reason for having false plates other than to
> commit *some* offence, likewise using someone else ID, having
> someone else's bank details etc etc.


Hmm, people wanting to avoid being identified could include someone
who isn't trying to hide from the law, just from the wife or husband
while out on a dogging jaunt or somesuch. Or people who strongly
object to being tagged and tracked by corporations and governments,
despite not doing anything unlawful (I'd put myself in this category).
I don't live in a glass house, I wear clothes rather than walk naked
and if some random person wanted me to empty my pockets I'd tell them
to sod off, however I don't have anything to hide.

The more that we're tagged and identifed, the more people are going to
want to fake plates, e.g. someone out in the country with no public
transport who's skint but has to drive down toll roads charged on
license plates could well find themselves in the situation where they
have to work but can't afford to pay the congestion charges that are
likely to spring up all over the shop charged on your license plate.
If they can travel for little cost in their car then rather than use
expensive public transport and pay expensive congestion charges then
they may well decide to fake their plates at least for a while in
order to get back on financial track. 10 years punishment for that.
It'll hit the poor most of all.

This is just one simple example, the more charges and bureaucracy that
are foisted on us, the more ordinary people are going to want to
wriggle. Slapping a 10-year sentence on a wriggle is a little OTT.
Can you predict what amazing schemes various mayors and councils will
scheme up in their idle hours once they have access to a means to
automatically approximately identify citizens as they move around in
their area? If you strongly object to some stupid scheme that some
moron has dreamed up but the normal channels don't result in any
changes (e.g try protesting against London Congestion Charge or most
planning applications) then what do you do? How about a mass protest
where people swap plates, 10 years jail term for all!

> Of course there does need to be common sense applied


"Common sense" is one of those wonderful subjective things that people
bandy about that mean one thing to them and the opposite to others.
I'd say you've shown none on this subject but plenty on others.
Remember that common sense dictated that the earth was flat and the
stars and sun went around the earth.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
 

"beamendsltd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:c6cf6e84d%[email protected]...
> In message <[email protected]>
> Ian Rawlings <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 2006-01-12, Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote:
> >
> > > If anything, we've moved substantially to a culture of immediate
> > > guilt, where innocence has to be proved.

> >
> > .. and more towards a scheme where not only is the above true, but
> > guilt is assigned by automated camera-based systems reading easily
> > faked ID tags. The innocent-have-nothing-to-fear brigade are way

off
> > the mark on this one.
> >

>
> Not if the penalty for faking is *massive*, something like a

no-quibble
> ten year automatic sentence for false number plates or similar.
> It's that faking that needs to be stopped so that the criminal

*knows*
> they are going to prison even if they have not yet commited the

offence
> which they were planning.
> If their crime was simply avoiding the congestion charge then that's
> their problem. I can think of no reason for having false plates
> other than to commit *some* offence, likewise using someone else ID,
> having someone else's bank details etc etc. Of course there does

need
> to be common sense applied, unlike Ken and his mates in London where
> people in Cheshire get a congestion charge ticket for a vehicle that
> does not match the photo (which usally seems to get lost in such
> circumstances). Indeed, that is when the camears based systems could
> come to the fore - someone in Cheshire cannot be in two places at

one
> time.
>
> Richard


So what happens if in all innocence you buy a car with the wrong
plates on it - should you go away for 10 years? This happened to one
of my staff and it was only when he noticed that the security etching
on the glass had two numbers reversed compared to the plates that it
came to light. Garage (main dealer) had made new plates so it looked
smarter to sell but the opperator who did it made an error.

AWEM


 
In message <[email protected]>
Ian Rawlings <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2006-01-12, beamendsltd <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Not if the penalty for faking is *massive*, something like a
> > no-quibble ten year automatic sentence for false number plates or
> > similar.

>
> That would be absurd, large sentences for faking a numberplate and
> small sentences for killing a person, it wouldn't stack up.
>
> I'm sure this'll bring out comments of "large sentences for killing
> should be automatic", plenty of reasons why that shouldn't be the case
> and why no civilised country takes that approach.
>


The size of sentances for murder/manslaugheter is another issue
altogether.

> > It's that faking that needs to be stopped so that the criminal
> > *knows* they are going to prison even if they have not yet commited
> > the offence which they were planning.

>
> Locking people up because they might be going to commit a crime of a
> type you don't know? Now you're *really* talking about a police
> state!


No - they *have* comitted a crime - faking. Why should they do that,
if not to cover another crime?

>
> > I can think of no reason for having false plates other than to
> > commit *some* offence, likewise using someone else ID, having
> > someone else's bank details etc etc.

>
> Hmm, people wanting to avoid being identified could include someone
> who isn't trying to hide from the law, just from the wife or husband
> while out on a dogging jaunt or somesuch. Or people who strongly
> object to being tagged and tracked by corporations and governments,
> despite not doing anything unlawful (I'd put myself in this category).
> I don't live in a glass house, I wear clothes rather than walk naked
> and if some random person wanted me to empty my pockets I'd tell them
> to sod off, however I don't have anything to hide.
>
> The more that we're tagged and identifed, the more people are going to
> want to fake plates, e.g. someone out in the country with no public
> transport who's skint but has to drive down toll roads charged on
> license plates could well find themselves in the situation where they
> have to work but can't afford to pay the congestion charges that are
> likely to spring up all over the shop charged on your license plate.
> If they can travel for little cost in their car then rather than use
> expensive public transport and pay expensive congestion charges then
> they may well decide to fake their plates at least for a while in
> order to get back on financial track. 10 years punishment for that.
> It'll hit the poor most of all.
>
> This is just one simple example, the more charges and bureaucracy that
> are foisted on us, the more ordinary people are going to want to
> wriggle. Slapping a 10-year sentence on a wriggle is a little OTT.
> Can you predict what amazing schemes various mayors and councils will
> scheme up in their idle hours once they have access to a means to
> automatically approximately identify citizens as they move around in
> their area? If you strongly object to some stupid scheme that some
> moron has dreamed up but the normal channels don't result in any
> changes (e.g try protesting against London Congestion Charge or most
> planning applications) then what do you do? How about a mass protest
> where people swap plates, 10 years jail term for all!


I can't see what your point is. It is already the case that if you can't
afford, for example, to insure your car you shouldn't drive it and
doing so is a offence. Nothing new there. If you want to cheat on your
partner that is your problem.

>
> > Of course there does need to be common sense applied

>
> "Common sense" is one of those wonderful subjective things that people
> bandy about that mean one thing to them and the opposite to others.
> I'd say you've shown none on this subject but plenty on others.
> Remember that common sense dictated that the earth was flat and the
> stars and sun went around the earth.


And I would say exactly the same to you, so we'll just have to agree to
disagree. You should try living on an "estate" as I do to see what the
real world is like, it was a huge shock getting there after the "nice",
"comfortable" world that those who bang on about civil liberties seem
to live in, and I used to.

Richard

--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Boycott the Yorkshire Dales - No Play, No Pay
 
In message <[email protected]>
"Andrew Mawson" <andrew@no_spam_please_mawson.org.uk> wrote:

>
> "beamendsltd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:c6cf6e84d%[email protected]...
> > In message <[email protected]>
> > Ian Rawlings <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2006-01-12, Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If anything, we've moved substantially to a culture of immediate
> > > > guilt, where innocence has to be proved.
> > >
> > > .. and more towards a scheme where not only is the above true, but
> > > guilt is assigned by automated camera-based systems reading easily
> > > faked ID tags. The innocent-have-nothing-to-fear brigade are way

> off
> > > the mark on this one.
> > >

> >
> > Not if the penalty for faking is *massive*, something like a

> no-quibble
> > ten year automatic sentence for false number plates or similar.
> > It's that faking that needs to be stopped so that the criminal

> *knows*
> > they are going to prison even if they have not yet commited the

> offence
> > which they were planning.
> > If their crime was simply avoiding the congestion charge then that's
> > their problem. I can think of no reason for having false plates
> > other than to commit *some* offence, likewise using someone else ID,
> > having someone else's bank details etc etc. Of course there does

> need
> > to be common sense applied, unlike Ken and his mates in London where
> > people in Cheshire get a congestion charge ticket for a vehicle that
> > does not match the photo (which usally seems to get lost in such
> > circumstances). Indeed, that is when the camears based systems could
> > come to the fore - someone in Cheshire cannot be in two places at

> one
> > time.
> >
> > Richard

>
> So what happens if in all innocence you buy a car with the wrong
> plates on it - should you go away for 10 years? This happened to one
> of my staff and it was only when he noticed that the security etching
> on the glass had two numbers reversed compared to the plates that it
> came to light. Garage (main dealer) had made new plates so it looked
> smarter to sell but the opperator who did it made an error.
>
> AWEM
>
>


The matter gets investigated, as it obviously was, and resolved, as
it obvioulsy was - there is no change there excpet the ease of detecting
the error.

Richard
--
 
Back
Top