Front disc rotors on '03 Disco

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Guest
The vehicle has 38K miles and general braking performance has never beena
problem except for a squeal when braking lightly at low speed.

The dealer reported that the front disc brake pads had plenty of wear
remaining but the front rotors had worn too thin! The service tech thought
that the wear on the rotors had caused a ridge on the rotor to develop that
contacted the caliper and caused the squeal. After replacing the rotors I
still have the squeal.

I tend to be easy on brakes with mostly highway travel, no tailgating, and
look ahead driving.

Comments?

TIA
 
....and [email protected] spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...


> The vehicle has 38K miles and general braking performance has never
> been a problem except for a squeal when braking lightly at low speed.
>
> The dealer reported that the front disc brake pads had plenty of wear
> remaining but the front rotors had worn too thin! The service tech
> thought that the wear on the rotors had caused a ridge on the rotor
> to develop that contacted the caliper and caused the squeal. After
> replacing the rotors I still have the squeal.
>
> I tend to be easy on brakes with mostly highway travel, no
> tailgating, and look ahead driving.
>
> Comments?
>
> TIA


Your mechanic was partly right. The wear leaves a ridge which contacts the
sides of the brake pads rather than the friction area and makes them rattle
and squeal at low speeds. If the disc (rotor) was contacting the calipers
you would have a real problem. I cured it on my P38 (similar axles) by
replacing the discs - a very easy job. If these have been replaced, were
new pads fitted (I should hope so)? If so, taking the pads out and applying
a small amount of copper grease to the backs and any areas that might
contact the calipers might cure it. Easy or heavy on the brakes should make
no difference - correctly set up, they should work and not squeal.

--
Rich
==============================

There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary
and those who don't.


 
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:15:29 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>...and [email protected] spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...
>
>
>> The vehicle has 38K miles and general braking performance has never
>> been a problem except for a squeal when braking lightly at low speed.
>>
>> The dealer reported that the front disc brake pads had plenty of wear
>> remaining but the front rotors had worn too thin! The service tech
>> thought that the wear on the rotors had caused a ridge on the rotor
>> to develop that contacted the caliper and caused the squeal. After
>> replacing the rotors I still have the squeal.
>>
>> I tend to be easy on brakes with mostly highway travel, no
>> tailgating, and look ahead driving.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> TIA

>
>Your mechanic was partly right. The wear leaves a ridge which contacts the
>sides of the brake pads rather than the friction area and makes them rattle
>and squeal at low speeds. If the disc (rotor) was contacting the calipers
>you would have a real problem. I cured it on my P38 (similar axles) by
>replacing the discs - a very easy job. If these have been replaced, were
>new pads fitted (I should hope so)? If so, taking the pads out and applying
>a small amount of copper grease to the backs and any areas that might
>contact the calipers might cure it. Easy or heavy on the brakes should make
>no difference - correctly set up, they should work and not squeal.


Thanks for your reply. I may have misunderstood what the wear-created
ridges on the rotors were contacting, maybe it was the side of the pads -I
was picturing that contact to be to the caliper itself.

The pads were not changed. On my next routine visit to the dealer I'll
explore changing pads and ask about the use of copper grease.

With my limited mechanical experience I'm still surprised that the pads
were fine but the rotors wore out!

Thanks again,

LB
 
....and [email protected] spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...


> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:15:29 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ...and [email protected] spake unto the tribes of Usenet,
>> saying...
>>
>>
>>> The vehicle has 38K miles and general braking performance has never
>>> been a problem except for a squeal when braking lightly at low
>>> speed.
>>>
>>> The dealer reported that the front disc brake pads had plenty of
>>> wear remaining but the front rotors had worn too thin! The service
>>> tech thought that the wear on the rotors had caused a ridge on the
>>> rotor to develop that contacted the caliper and caused the squeal.
>>> After replacing the rotors I still have the squeal.
>>>
>>> I tend to be easy on brakes with mostly highway travel, no
>>> tailgating, and look ahead driving.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> TIA

>>
>> Your mechanic was partly right. The wear leaves a ridge which
>> contacts the sides of the brake pads rather than the friction area
>> and makes them rattle and squeal at low speeds. If the disc (rotor)
>> was contacting the calipers you would have a real problem. I cured
>> it on my P38 (similar axles) by replacing the discs - a very easy
>> job. If these have been replaced, were new pads fitted (I should
>> hope so)? If so, taking the pads out and applying a small amount of
>> copper grease to the backs and any areas that might contact the
>> calipers might cure it. Easy or heavy on the brakes should make no
>> difference - correctly set up, they should work and not squeal.

>
> Thanks for your reply. I may have misunderstood what the wear-created
> ridges on the rotors were contacting, maybe it was the side of the
> pads - I was picturing that contact to be to the caliper itself.
>
> The pads were not changed. On my next routine visit to the dealer
> I'll explore changing pads and ask about the use of copper grease.
>
> With my limited mechanical experience I'm still surprised that the
> pads were fine but the rotors wore out!
>
> Thanks again,
>
> LB


I'm very surprised the pads were not changed with the new rotors. The pads
contact most of the disc/rotor area, but there is a small band on the very
outside, perhaps 2mm wide, where they do not. As the disc/rotor wears, it
leaves a step on the outside of the disk which will also corrode as it is
not swept by the pads. As the pads oscillate slightly, a step is also worn
in the side of the pads. It is the interference between these two steps
that caused the pads to vibrate and sqeal. There is a similar unswept area
on the inner part of the disc, and of course the same on the other side. In
effect, the pads and discs wear a pattern into each other, and it is always
good practice to replace both if you are replacing the disc.

I doubt if the original pads lasted 38k miles, so they will have been
replaced at some point. With a heavy vehicle like a Disco, a very hard pad
compound is necessary, which does tend to wear the discs out in time. These
days I regard brake discs as consumable items, which will probably need
replacing 40-80k miles from new. 38k seems quite soon, but doesn't surprise
me.

The copper grease dodge shouldn't, strictly speaking, be necessary if all
the parts are fitted back correctly with new anti-rattle shims etc, but in
reality it is often the cure for an annoying squeal that won't respond to
anything else. Just make sure that only a smear is used, and can't get
anywhere near the friction surface.

--
Rich
==============================

There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary
and those who don't.


 
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:49:48 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>...and [email protected] spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...
>
>
>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:15:29 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> ...and [email protected] spake unto the tribes of Usenet,
>>> saying...
>>>
>>>
>>>> The vehicle has 38K miles and general braking performance has never
>>>> been a problem except for a squeal when braking lightly at low
>>>> speed.
>>>>
>>>> The dealer reported that the front disc brake pads had plenty of
>>>> wear remaining but the front rotors had worn too thin! The service
>>>> tech thought that the wear on the rotors had caused a ridge on the
>>>> rotor to develop that contacted the caliper and caused the squeal.
>>>> After replacing the rotors I still have the squeal.
>>>>
>>>> I tend to be easy on brakes with mostly highway travel, no
>>>> tailgating, and look ahead driving.
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>>
>>>> TIA
>>>
>>> Your mechanic was partly right. The wear leaves a ridge which
>>> contacts the sides of the brake pads rather than the friction area
>>> and makes them rattle and squeal at low speeds. If the disc (rotor)
>>> was contacting the calipers you would have a real problem. I cured
>>> it on my P38 (similar axles) by replacing the discs - a very easy
>>> job. If these have been replaced, were new pads fitted (I should
>>> hope so)? If so, taking the pads out and applying a small amount of
>>> copper grease to the backs and any areas that might contact the
>>> calipers might cure it. Easy or heavy on the brakes should make no
>>> difference - correctly set up, they should work and not squeal.

>>
>> Thanks for your reply. I may have misunderstood what the wear-created
>> ridges on the rotors were contacting, maybe it was the side of the
>> pads - I was picturing that contact to be to the caliper itself.
>>
>> The pads were not changed. On my next routine visit to the dealer
>> I'll explore changing pads and ask about the use of copper grease.
>>
>> With my limited mechanical experience I'm still surprised that the
>> pads were fine but the rotors wore out!
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> LB

>
>I'm very surprised the pads were not changed with the new rotors.


Yes, that seemed strange to me too but I was assured the pads had very
little wear. In fact, the service mgr also asked if I had replaced the
pads. I've had the vehicle serviced only at the dealer (free periodic
servicing) and unless the dealer did it without telling me (or making a
record of it) the pads are original.

>The pads
>contact most of the disc/rotor area, but there is a small band on the very
>outside, perhaps 2mm wide, where they do not. As the disc/rotor wears, it
>leaves a step on the outside of the disk which will also corrode as it is
>not swept by the pads. As the pads oscillate slightly, a step is also worn
>in the side of the pads. It is the interference between these two steps
>that caused the pads to vibrate and sqeal. There is a similar unswept area
>on the inner part of the disc, and of course the same on the other side.In
>effect, the pads and discs wear a pattern into each other, and it is always
>good practice to replace both if you are replacing the disc.
>


Perhaps in a few thousand miles some wear on the rotors and a little more
wear on the pads will eliminate the squeal completely. I think it is a
little better. I'll wait until the next scheduled maintenance

>I doubt if the original pads lasted 38k miles, so they will have been
>replaced at some point. With a heavy vehicle like a Disco, a very hard pad
>compound is necessary, which does tend to wear the discs out in time. These
>days I regard brake discs as consumable items, which will probably need
>replacing 40-80k miles from new. 38k seems quite soon, but doesn't surprise
>me.
>
>The copper grease dodge shouldn't, strictly speaking, be necessary if all
>the parts are fitted back correctly with new anti-rattle shims etc, but in
>reality it is often the cure for an annoying squeal that won't respond to
>anything else. Just make sure that only a smear is used, and can't get
>anywhere near the friction surface.


I appreciate your input. Mainly, I was surprised that the vehicle needed
new rotors given the mileage, my driving habits, etc. and wondered if
others might be having a similar experience because of a Land Rover
deficiency in materials or design. Guess not.

Thanks again.

LB
 
In message <[email protected]>, Margaret and
Loren Block <[email protected]> writes
>On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:49:48 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I appreciate your input. Mainly, I was surprised that the vehicle needed
>new rotors given the mileage, my driving habits, etc. and wondered if
>others might be having a similar experience because of a Land Rover
>deficiency in materials or design. Guess not.
>


I ran a Td5 (diesel) automatic Discovery II from new in 2000 until I
part-exchanged it five years later, with 58,000 miles on the clock. It
was main-dealer serviced throughout and MoT tested at three, four and
five years and brake discs (rotors) and pads were never renewed, or even
mentioned.
--
Peter

 
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:43:58 +0000, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:

>In message <[email protected]>, Margaret and
>Loren Block <[email protected]> writes
>>On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:49:48 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>I appreciate your input. Mainly, I was surprised that the vehicle needed
>>new rotors given the mileage, my driving habits, etc. and wondered if
>>others might be having a similar experience because of a Land Rover
>>deficiency in materials or design. Guess not.
>>

>
>I ran a Td5 (diesel) automatic Discovery II from new in 2000 until I
>part-exchanged it five years later, with 58,000 miles on the clock. It
>was main-dealer serviced throughout and MoT tested at three, four and
>five years and brake discs (rotors) and pads were never renewed, or even
>mentioned.


I believe there was a major change in brake components in the '03 Disco. We
had a '00 Disco (gasoline) that was a bit iffy on high-speed quick stops
however when trading the vehicle with 44K miles the brake components did
not show sufficient wear to warrant replacement. The '03 Disco has
preformed noticeably better on braking. LR appears to have traded rotor
life for braking performance.
 
In message <[email protected]>, Margaret and
Loren Block <[email protected]> writes
>On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:43:58 +0000, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>In message <[email protected]>, Margaret and
>>Loren Block <[email protected]> writes
>>>On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:49:48 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>I appreciate your input. Mainly, I was surprised that the vehicle needed
>>>new rotors given the mileage, my driving habits, etc. and wondered if
>>>others might be having a similar experience because of a Land Rover
>>>deficiency in materials or design. Guess not.
>>>

>>
>>I ran a Td5 (diesel) automatic Discovery II from new in 2000 until I
>>part-exchanged it five years later, with 58,000 miles on the clock. It
>>was main-dealer serviced throughout and MoT tested at three, four and
>>five years and brake discs (rotors) and pads were never renewed, or even
>>mentioned.

>
>I believe there was a major change in brake components in the '03 Disco. We
>had a '00 Disco (gasoline) that was a bit iffy on high-speed quick stops
>however when trading the vehicle with 44K miles the brake components did
>not show sufficient wear to warrant replacement. The '03 Disco has
>preformed noticeably better on braking. LR appears to have traded rotor
>life for braking performance.


That's interesting. I part-exchanged my 2000 Discovery for one of the
last of the Discovery IIs, a six-months old September 2004 model, and
that has much more reassuring braking (and is a noticeably better
vehicle overall). Its current mileage is only 15,000, so I have yet to
test your theory.
--
Peter

 
>
>I ran a Td5 (diesel) automatic Discovery II from new in 2000 until I
>part-exchanged it five years later, with 58,000 miles on the clock. It
>was main-dealer serviced throughout and MoT tested at three, four and
>five years and brake discs (rotors) and pads were never renewed, or even
>mentioned.


I believe there was a major change in brake components in the '03 Disco. We
had a '00 Disco (gasoline) that was a bit iffy on high-speed quick stops
however when trading the vehicle with 44K miles the brake components did
not show sufficient wear to warrant replacement. The '03 Disco has
preformed noticeably better on braking. LR appears to have traded rotor
life for braking performance.

I think my discs are original at 225,000 miles. I've driven the car for
100,000 of them, the brakes squeal from time to time for periods of up to
several months. Then it stops all by itself. At one point when it was
squealing I had the pads changed as they were at their wear limit but the
squeal remained even with new pads. I'm changing the discs now but not the
pads as they are very new, the discs, or at least one of them, may be warped
as I get a wobble on the steering, worse on braking. I'm changing the wheel
bearings at the same time as they are so cheap.

TonyB


 
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:40:11 +0000 (UTC), "TonyB" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>I think my discs are original at 225,000 miles. I've driven the car for
>100,000 of them, the brakes squeal from time to time for periods of up to
>several months. Then it stops all by itself. At one point when it was
>squealing I had the pads changed as they were at their wear limit but the
>squeal remained even with new pads. I'm changing the discs now but not the
>pads as they are very new, the discs, or at least one of them, may be warped
>as I get a wobble on the steering, worse on braking. I'm changing the wheel
>bearings at the same time as they are so cheap.
>
>TonyB
>



I understand that some squealing can be caused by glazing on the pads. I
tried several consecutive hard stops at high speed to melt the glaze, but
the squealing continues. Sounds like it might be working for you.

Very impressive mileage on your discs. What year / model is your Land
Rover?

Thanks,
LB
 
Very impressive mileage on your discs. What year / model is your Land
Rover?

Thanks,
LB

It's a '92 Disco I 200 TDi. The new discs seem to have cured the wheel
wobble I've been banging on about for months now.
I've spent a fortune on new tyres, balancing, tracking and checks on
steering geometry and pre-loads and at last seem to have found the problem.

TonyB


 

"TonyB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Very impressive mileage on your discs. What year / model is your Land
> Rover?
>
> Thanks,
> LB
>
> It's a '92 Disco I 200 TDi. The new discs seem to have cured the wheel
> wobble I've been banging on about for months now.
> I've spent a fortune on new tyres, balancing, tracking and checks on
> steering geometry and pre-loads and at last seem to have found the

problem.

Dammit, I was premature on that last statement. Just driven from Norfolk to
Birmingham and back today and the wobble's still there. It's moved up the
speed scale a bit and it's not quite as bad, but definitely still there. So
it must either be a square tyre ( although I swapped 'em all round with the
spare recently, that's how I b*******d the spare wheel carrier) or maybe a
bent shaft of some sort.

TonyB


 
Hi Tony

I'm not familiar with something as new as an '03 Disco (or your previous
posts on the wobble) - I had a wobble on a Range Rover that was due to the
panhard rod bushes being worn - if an '03 Disco has such a thing - have you
checked the bushes?

Graeme


"TonyB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "TonyB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Very impressive mileage on your discs. What year / model is your Land
> > Rover?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > LB
> >
> > It's a '92 Disco I 200 TDi. The new discs seem to have cured the wheel
> > wobble I've been banging on about for months now.
> > I've spent a fortune on new tyres, balancing, tracking and checks on
> > steering geometry and pre-loads and at last seem to have found the

> problem.
>
> Dammit, I was premature on that last statement. Just driven from Norfolk

to
> Birmingham and back today and the wobble's still there. It's moved up the
> speed scale a bit and it's not quite as bad, but definitely still there.

So
> it must either be a square tyre ( although I swapped 'em all round with

the
> spare recently, that's how I b*******d the spare wheel carrier) or maybe a
> bent shaft of some sort.
>
> TonyB
>
>



 
Back
Top