Actually, to say "more fuel = more power" and that "it is the other way round" is a/ a gross oversimplification and b/ not even true, cos if the "more fuel" cannot be aspirated into the engine efficiently, burnt efficiently and then got rid of efficiently, then the extra fuel gives nowhere near as much extra power as it could. To burn the "more fuel" efficiently you need the more air, or denser air which comes from the intercooler.
And how can you remap a D1 unless it is auto, which OP's isn't.
I agree totally with his decision to go for a bigger intercooler, though one from a P38 would be cheaper than say an Alisports one. See
http://www.dieselbob.co.uk/DieselTuning.aspx for the four things he says would need to be done to mechanically tune an old, pre map, diesel.
You'll notice intercooler is right there up with tuning the pump.
Still think he needed to mention the exhaust though. Td5 Disco, centre box removed, made NO difference to my vehicle at all. D1 SPORTS exhaust fitted, i.e. wider bore through out and only one box at the rear, (bought through LR specialist),
massive improvement. Removing the centre box does not make the rest of the exhaust more effficient it just removes some of the obstructive nature of the silencer, which sadly, is not a lot. So I wonder whether OP needs to think about that.
I accept that the OM built the cars without ultimate power in their minds and that yes, on a
TD5 a remap probably would make a decent difference, but that is not putting more fuel in it is just using efficiently the fuel available. We could argue about what "fuel available " means in a modern motor, I suppose.
If you disagree with me on general tuning of internal combustion engines then why not try reading something from an acknowledged expert like David Vizard, who was very active around the time the D1 was about. you'll find he, and others, all agree on the necessity to improve flow before anything else.