Im due In court Fri can anyone help !!!

Wanagetmuddy said:

I wasnt wading sirus at all I was trying to get home


The thing is to get to my abode theres are three ways from worcester

Down the m5 to j8 and come back through tewksbury
M% was shut due to the flood

the other was via Bromyard and there was a landslide so no can do there

The other was through worcester then towards powick which was shut

So yeah I was f**kd in trying to get home as all areas were closed and to be fair impassable and at two am in the morning I wasnt going to risk night wading !!

Click to expand...

Wanagetmuddy said:

But I was trying to get home

Click to expand...

Wanagetmuddy said:

This is the officers witness statement.

""On the Day and the date overleaf I clearly saw the defendant driving through a road closure on deansway, Worcester
The Road was completely blocked by big foot cones and road closure sign."

The officer did not see me, he was half a mile up the road stationary with his blue lights on.

The police officer was parked at All saints road, between bridge street at the junction


"The defendant drove the wrong way around a keep left bollard and pedestrian crossing to get around the closure when stopped and question he said that he wanted to see the floods. "

He did not see me! I wanted to speak to an officer initially, as I had spoken to an officer suggesting half hour an before at Tewksbury who was the helpful one, to find a way home

If the officer had used my full sentence, "he wanted to see the floods so that i could find out if I could get home which I had been trying since friday night .

He was driving a 4x4 vehicle and appeared to be driving round the flooded areas, deliberately ignoring warning signs, just to drive through the floods

I was merely trying to get home it was 2am on sunday morning ! He jaust assumed the later part

Click to expand...

yella said:

no mention of being away all week and wanting to get home, no mention of having to spend yet another night on someones settee, infact, whats that there " The Previous day I had been going around and pulling random people out of the floods just to help out!"



ffs just admit it and stop trying to back pedal.

Click to expand...

Read up inspector

Tell them you were suffering from stress and depression and you were looking for a place to access the river to kill yourself, after all they saw you driving about and what other reason would someboudy be splashing about in flouds unless they were deranged.

david451 said:

Tell them you were suffering from stress and depression and you were looking for a place to access the river to kill yourself, after all they saw you driving about and what other reason would someboudy be splashing about in flouds unless they were deranged.

Click to expand...

Christ which bit have I put down on here that I was in the flood at the time of the incident !

I'm a bit confoosed if you'd been working away all week and were trying to get home at 02:00 on the Sunday morning. then how did your Girlfriend reach you If she was surrounded by flood water. I'm assuming that if you couldn't get in then she couldn't get out. and yet she was in your car at 02:00 on the sunday morning.

you see, the thing is, in the first post there was never any mention of being away all week, there was never any mention of having to sleep on a sofa cos yer couldnt get home . but then in post 5 or what ever number it was, after a bit of cross examination from the lz jury, you suddenly happened to have been away all week.maybe its a good job they let you off cos there are more holes in your confusing back pedalling story that i get the impression you struggle to lie straight in bed

redhand said:

I'm a bit confoosed if you'd been working away all week and were trying to get home at 02:00 on the Sunday morning. then how did your Girlfriend reach you If she was surrounded by flood water. I'm assuming that if you couldn't get in then she couldn't get out. and yet she was in your car at 02:00 on the sunday morning.

Click to expand...

Whoa stop getting ahead of yourself

I live in one town and my girlfriend lives in the other

Mine was basically in the middle of a bowl once you were in on that friday you couldnt get out till monday

Her house was reachable by friday and mine wasnt cos mine is on the other side or the middle

Was trying to gain access to mine as I was off again early monday morning again, I needed clean clothes for the coming week.

yet more informaton yer failed ter mention in the first post

soon you'll be saying


but........if.........but...........but..........if.......

Oy chaps, i think under PACE Wanagetmuddy should be cautioned at this stage!!!
You din ave ter say nowt burrit may arm yer defender if you din menshoon wen kweschunnd summat wor yer L8r rely on in Courts (wen yer gits yer sofa). NEfin wot yer duz say may be given to the Gaylander boyz. Do yer understand?

yella said:

you see, the thing is, in the first post there was never any mention of being away all week, there was never any mention of having to sleep on a sofa cos yer couldnt get home . but then in post 5 or what ever number it was, after a bit of cross examination from the lz jury, you suddenly happened to have been away all week.maybe its a good job they let you off cos there are more holes in your confusing back pedalling story that i get the impression you struggle to lie straight in bed

Click to expand...

Like I said I couldnt write all the situation otherwise it would have been too long to read and write.

The story has always been the same and those were irrelavant if it got to court, hence why I didnt bother with them.

As people asked I answered.

I knew my Mitigation would have meant nothing to them nor yourselves and it would have made no difference in the way it would have come out of court.

The second sentence by the officer was based on assumption and fabrication and that would have been on what was on trial....

so the bit in the first post where you actually admitted going that way to have a look doesnt really count then???

yella said:

yet more informaton yer failed ter mention in the first post

Click to expand...

Not being funny mate most of the question were asked and were answered as they were asked you might have neglected to read all of them hence the repitions

So yer got off with goin to court (well done by the way, RESULT!!) but yer gettin the inqisition on ere??? Wassalltha'bout then???

fook knows odie, everyone said well done, yer got away with it, then he decided ter start puttin up a case fer the defence

odenne said:

So yer got off with goin to court (well done by the way, RESULT!!) but yer gettin the inqisition on ere??? Wassalltha'bout then???

Click to expand...

Dunno mate

I suppose if you just part read the thread you'd get lost and would find it difficult to understand .

I thought preparing to go to court was hard enough but The LZ jury seem to be proving a lot more difficult.

I think some are very much of never cross the line, never do againts the law type of peps and some us take chances and nver get caught and some take chances and get caught.

Ive have taken chances and got caught a couple of times and I took the rap but the sentence I got could have been reduced under technicalities which is something I learned the hard way.

HAHA! Seems the title of the fred was brought about through an epiphinacial (Wow, what a good word i just invented!) moment of unexpected foresight - albeit a day out - but seems the CPS ain't got nothing on the LandyZone prosecution service! Might offer the LZPS up for the job next time the cops put the tender out for the CPS!

yella said:

fook knows odie, everyone said well done, yer got away with it, then he decided ter start puttin up a case fer the defence

Click to expand...

I havent really,

When I was asked I answered the questions

Like some peps have said its all done and over with !!



Also some accused and assumed that I was doing things that I wasnt so I merely pointing them out.

benn reading this fred and and in all likely hood the case was dropped due to it being a waste of time and our money for something relatively minor
not an addmission of innoccence
if youlld been in scotland once chargered or in contest of a fixed penalty you must go before a judge even for charges to be dropped
by your own addmission you where there to see flood levels
police have an often thankless job which isnt made any easier rescuing rubberneckers
you asked for trouble and got it
be glad you got of and get of the high horse you havnt been vindicated you where just lucky

Admin can we close this thread now please Thanks

Once again thanks for the peps that have advised !

Wanagetmuddy said:

Dunno mate

I suppose if you just part read the thread you'd get lost and would find it difficult to understand .

I thought preparing to go to court was hard enough but The LZ jury seem to be proving a lot more difficult.

I think some are very much of never cross the line, never do againts the law type of peps and some us take chances and nver get caught and some take chances and get caught.

Ive have taken chances and got caught a couple of times and I took the rap but the sentence I got could have been reduced under technicalities which is something I learned the hard way.

Click to expand...

the lz jury are one of the best in the world mate..the reason for that is there is some very very inteligent people on here(and some dimwits..lo daft ..only joking mate )..but these inteligent people read your posts and then question on what you yourself posted, this is like a cross examination in court would be, and your back peddling change of light and inconsistency in your replys was picked up and used against you in the next questions posed(again as would happen in court).

as for most on here not waivering while following the law, dont kid yourself everyone on here will have broke or bent some law at one time..albeit minor..

now congratulation's on cps contacting you to say there will be no case against you one day before you was to appere in court, thou i have never known the cps to contact someone direct only by letter and its useually 4 weeks prior to the case's hearing date to formally give intended notice of dismisal..flyte case's(short notice case's) are normally cancled in the court on the date of hereing(you find out when you hand yourself into the warrent's officer in charge on that day)..but yeh congratulations mate.