RRC 3.5 or 3.9 which is best?

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

*the-drakes*

New Member
Posts
4
Hi all, new to the forum and hoping for a bit of advice. I am looking at getting a RRC and have found 2 that I like, both are on LPG and have full MOT's and near enough the same price. One is a 3.5 and the other is a 3.9 and they are both auto's. Is there any pros or cons for either or is one particularly better than the other? Any advice would be great. Thanks in advance. Andy
 
How old are you / whats your insurance rating like?
3.9 is the 'nicer' engine, 20bhp more on the quoted output, but an awful lot more low down 'stomp', though entirely dependent on condition / set up.
3.5 is easier to insure, particularly for younger drivers; 3.9 due to capacity and class of car when new falls into a much higher insurance group that some companies wont offer to drivers under 30, apparemtly.
3.5 usually has flapper EFi if its an injected engine, or carbs, where 3.9's tend to be hot wire.
No significant advantages one way or the other; carbs motors are a tad thirstier and a tad less powerful than EFi's, of the EFi's, hot wire is a bit eaiser to get bits for and has a couple less common problems......
Again, end of the day, condition is more important than spec.
You say both have LPG, what systems do they have, where are there tanks?
Boot tanks rob space and often stop you folding the seats down to avail yourself of the full benefit of the 'estate' car, under sill tanks rob ground clerence..... once better off orad, onces more practical for doing the 'chores'......
Open loop LPG is not that refined or responsive, but easy to set up and generally reliable, closed loop more complicated but a bit more responsive and a tad more ecconomical if you can get it set up right.
Which one is in better nick vis rust on the chassis, the sills and in the crooks and nannies of the body?
Have you checked all the usual suspects, like behind the sill covers, in the rear wheel arches and boot floors, and around the inner wings and body mounts at the out-riggers?
Which is tidier / has more of its toys working?
and if all else fails; and insurance not an issue; go for the 3.9 for the simple reason that they made more of them with fewer variations so less niggles with obsolete or difficult to find bits; engines got more go, and its probably the younger car!
 
Hi, I'm 26. I have had a quote on insurance and the 3.9 is £37 a year more. Fully Comp £316.50 for the 3.5 and £353.50 for the 3.9 so no real issues regarding insurance. Its actually cheaper than my 2005 Picasso 2.0HDi. I dont plan on doing any real off roading (well not to start with) the main usage is going to be towing my off road bikes and quads about loaded up with the kids going off for the day to play on the bikes. I checked insurance on nearly every 4x4 available for under a grand and the RRC and Disco's were coming in the cheapest by far hence why I decided on one. I'm not sure on the type of LPG kit to be honest and both have there tanks fitted in the boot. I have not viewed either vehicle in person as yet so not had a real look. I was just after advice before I went to look in cse I end up buying one. Is there any real difference with the MPG? I know both are going to be quite thirsty but as I plan on doing quite a few miles on the weekends every little helps. The 3.5 is a 89 model and the 3.9 a 90 model so no real difference age wise. Thanks
 
Book quoted 15mpg, for either; in use, well........ drive it like you stole it and you'll be in single figures, drive it like your granny and you can get over 20mpg from either.
The little bit of extra stomp on the 3.9, though can go one or other way; you either use it cos you have it and blitz the mpg, or you keep it in 'reserve' and use it to save you a little juice not having to down shift for hills or stuff......
I'll forgive you the quad's ONLY if you tell me they are for toddlers.... else get rid and get a PROPPER motorbike!
Ruddy things...... bikes for people wot are too stupid to know better and too afraid of a propper machine!
If you get the Rangie, DO anticipate off-roading it........... it wont be long until you have that idea....
How I started; got a Series to haul my family about and get me and my comp-trials bike to events........... you look at the bike, you look at the car, you look at the 'course' and you start wondering......
Next thing you know, you are doing P&P's in the Rover, and wondering if you can get it airborne like you do the bike, jiving it a 'squirt' as you crest a bump.......
The andswer is 'Yes, you can' BTW..... not that it'll save your bump stops, as you'll still want to try and prove it!
 
Back
Top