Recall for LR3 RR & RRS

A

Adam Bryce

Guest

• Nov 8, 2005

• #1

http://www.newsinferno.com/storypages/11-07-2005~005.html






Adam

 

N

Nigel Hewitt

Guest

• Nov 8, 2005

• #2

Adam Bryce wrote:
> http://www.newsinferno.com/storypages/11-07-2005~005.html

Did anybody else read the first line and wonder how there could
be a recall on a vehicle over 50 years old?

Or is it just me being senile...

nigelH

 

J

John Moppett

Guest

• Nov 8, 2005

• #3

Nigel Hewitt wrote:
> Adam Bryce wrote:
>
>>http://www.newsinferno.com/storypages/11-07-2005~005.html
>
>
> Did anybody else read the first line and wonder how there could
> be a recall on a vehicle over 50 years old?
>
> Or is it just me being senile...
>
> nigelH
>
>
NO, it's you reading what they wrote, and didn't edit because they
didn't read it back. I had the same problem!

 

Bigstoo

New Member

Posts

298

Location

Republic of Yorkshire

• Nov 8, 2005

• #4

its the quantity being recalled not the year of manufacture

 

D

Derek

Guest

• Nov 8, 2005

• #5

"Nigel Hewitt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Adam Bryce wrote:
> > http://www.newsinferno.com/storypages/11-07-2005~005.html
>
> Did anybody else read the first line and wonder how there could
> be a recall on a vehicle over 50 years old?
>
> Or is it just me being senile...
>
> nigelH
>
Nope what I thought was "they weren't making Rangies in 1949 were they?" the
recall is secondary as nothing that happens in the US surprises me that much
not after they relected Bushie
Derek
(90 days without charge? lets trial it starting with Blair while we work out
what he did)