On Monday, in article <
[email protected]>
[email protected] "TonyB" wrote:
> "hugh" <hugh@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Came across this URL on another mailing list for those interested in
> > Green Laning issues.
> >
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/ican/G446
>
> I live off road up a lane that is designated as a footpath. If vehicles are
> banned from footpaths then neither I, nor my neighbours will be able to get
> to our properties. In terms of damage, our unmade lane takes cars and
> lorries up to 30 tonnes and only suffers a few ruts which we fill in with a
> bit of whatever comes to hand -rubble, old sinks, mother-in-laws etc etc.
This is the sort of situation which enrages the urban ramblerdroid.
"Their" footpath runs on some private right of way, And so they get all
hot and bothered when any vehicle goes past, screaming about how "it's
not allowed!"
Hopefully, any laws they get will not affect those private rights, and
maybe the landowners involved with some routes will get together with a
local club, and there will still be organised, safe, light-footed, trips
along the green lanes of England.
But, knowing some of the dodgy legal drafting on other attempts to buy
votes, anything could happen. Maybe some people living on green lanes
will sell their services as passengers, spending the soft summer days
being ferried back and forth, giving Land Rover drivers the necessary
reason to travel the lane.
--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.
"I am Number Two," said Penfold. "You are Number Six."