Range Rover Sport

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
B

Bob Hobden

Guest
Just read the road test back to back of the RR Sport the equivalent X5 4.8
and the Porsche Cayenne Turbo in Autocar this week. Looks good even if it
was beaten by the X5 overall.
But, LR really do have to address the excess weight of their vehicles, first
the new Disco 3 and now the RR Sport spinoff is much heavier than it's
competitors with all the problems that causes for it.

--
Regards
Bob
In Runnymede, 17 miles West of London




 
In message <[email protected]>
"Bob Hobden" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just read the road test back to back of the RR Sport the equivalent X5 4.8
> and the Porsche Cayenne Turbo in Autocar this week. Looks good even if it
> was beaten by the X5 overall.
> But, LR really do have to address the excess weight of their vehicles, first
> the new Disco 3 and now the RR Sport spinoff is much heavier than it's
> competitors with all the problems that causes for it.
>

Unless one is looking for an off-road vehicle (as opposed
to a 4 wheel drive), in which case none of the vehicles above
need apply. If LR want to compete on even terms with X5's etc
then they need a whole new vehicle, which would no longer be
a Land Rover and may as well have a Ford badge to avoid diluting
even further the marques image.
X5's etc simply reinforce the anti-4x4 peoples case and are
gong to do untold harm to those of us who actually go off-road
(i.e. not just National Trust car parks and insisting on
parking with two wheels on the kerb) and/or use our vehicles
off-road for work.

Sorry if I've upset anyone, but BMW, VW, Porsch (actually VW
with a spot of badge engineering) and even the current Shoguns
(have a look at the ground clearance) are all utterly pointless
vehicles - their owners would be much better off with a
4 wheel drive MPV, though slightly less inflated ego's.

Rant over!

Richard
--
 
On or around Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:52:29 +0100, "Bob Hobden" <[email protected]>
enlightened us thusly:

>Just read the road test back to back of the RR Sport the equivalent X5 4.8
>and the Porsche Cayenne Turbo in Autocar this week. Looks good even if it
>was beaten by the X5 overall.
>But, LR really do have to address the excess weight of their vehicles, first
>the new Disco 3 and now the RR Sport spinoff is much heavier than it's
>competitors with all the problems that causes for it.


I gather the Cayenne is no lightweight, though - 's just got a monster
sod-off engine...

--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.

a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
 
>
>Unless one is looking for an off-road vehicle (as opposed
>to a 4 wheel drive), in which case none of the vehicles above
>need apply. If LR want to compete on even terms with X5's etc
>then they need a whole new vehicle, which would no longer be
>a Land Rover and may as well have a Ford badge to avoid diluting
>even further the marques image.
>X5's etc simply reinforce the anti-4x4 peoples case and are
>gong to do untold harm to those of us who actually go off-road
>(i.e. not just National Trust car parks and insisting on
>parking with two wheels on the kerb) and/or use our vehicles
>off-road for work.
>
>Sorry if I've upset anyone, but BMW, VW, Porsch (actually VW
>with a spot of badge engineering) and even the current Shoguns
>(have a look at the ground clearance) are all utterly pointless
>vehicles - their owners would be much better off with a
>4 wheel drive MPV, though slightly less inflated ego's.
>
>Rant over!
>
>Richard


I disagree, in part. They are not pointless, though they are not
ideal as working vehicles in tough off-road conditions. Land Rover
(so far) still provide a very good vehicle for this, comparatively
small, market. Whilst the larger estates from Volvo, BMW et al do a
fine job (and I've got one), they not as good load carriers, not as
good tow vehicles and do not provide they great driving position of
the 4x4 vehicles.

I agree that 4x4 is a complete waste of a gearbox or three for many
buyers, but then again lots of people have spare bedrooms and we don't
force them to move house. It's called freedom, long may it reign.

From Land Rover's perspective, their market requires these vehicles.
That they are selling in huge numbers proves the point, as do the
waiting lists for the BMW X3 and the profit figures from the Range
Rover. If they do not respond and provide a product the market
requires they will fail as a business.

As for 'protecting the marque's image' - excuse me? They have a
lamentable reputation far and wide. Since day one every vehicle they
have produced is still the best off-roader in its class bar none,
including the Range Rover Sport. Improving quality and meeting
customer demand is the only way to improve that reputation. Pushing
the image of military equipment and agricultural machinery would be
marketing suicide.

Remember the British motorbike industry? No, neither do I.


--

Tim Hobbs

'58 Series 2 88" aka "Stig"
'77 101FC Ambulance aka "Burrt"
'03 Volvo V70

My Landies? http://www.seriesii.co.uk
Barcoding? http://www.bartec-systems.com
Tony Luckwill web archive at http://www.luckwill.com
 
In message <[email protected]>
Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:

> On or around Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:52:29 +0100, "Bob Hobden" <[email protected]>
> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >Just read the road test back to back of the RR Sport the equivalent X5 4.8
> >and the Porsche Cayenne Turbo in Autocar this week. Looks good even if it
> >was beaten by the X5 overall.
> >But, LR really do have to address the excess weight of their vehicles, first
> >the new Disco 3 and now the RR Sport spinoff is much heavier than it's
> >competitors with all the problems that causes for it.

>
> I gather the Cayenne is no lightweight, though - 's just got a monster
> sod-off engine...
>


...... with power and torque all in the wrong places - one
thing (up to Td5) LR always got right - the capacity and
and pure horse power are far less important that lb/ft at
low revs to those who want a *work* vehicle for off road
use - the very market LR created.

Richard

--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Helping keep Land Rovers on and off the road to annoy the Lib Dems
 

"Austin Shackles" wrote after "Bob Hobden" enlightened us thusly:
>
>>Just read the road test back to back of the RR Sport the equivalent X5 4.8
>>and the Porsche Cayenne Turbo in Autocar this week. Looks good even if it
>>was beaten by the X5 overall.
>>But, LR really do have to address the excess weight of their vehicles,
>>first
>>the new Disco 3 and now the RR Sport spinoff is much heavier than it's
>>competitors with all the problems that causes for it.

>
> I gather the Cayenne is no lightweight, though - 's just got a monster
> sod-off engine...
>

Figures from Autocar...

BMW X5 4.8is 2275Kg. 360bhp. 369lb ft . 0-62 in 6.1 sec

LR RR Sport 2572Kg. 390bhp. 405lb ft. 0-60 in 7.2 sec

Porsche Cayenne Turbo 2355Kg. 444bhp. 457lb ft. 0-60 in 5.4 sec

So you can see the effect of the extra weight, if it was as light as the BMW
(300Kg lighter) it would be close to the Porsche in performance.

--
Regards
Bob
In Runnymede, 17 miles West of London


 

"beamendsltd" wrote

>
> Sorry if I've upset anyone, but BMW, VW, Porsch (actually VW
> with a spot of badge engineering) and even the current Shoguns
> (have a look at the ground clearance) are all utterly pointless
> vehicles - their owners would be much better off with a
> 4 wheel drive MPV, though slightly less inflated ego's.
>


A 4x4 MPV, that'll be the forthcoming Mercedes R class then.
Slightly less inflated egos? I think not. :)

How about the proposed new Bentley 4x4 powered by the W12 450bhp engine,
that will get people up in arms in this country. A Bentley (lorry) on
stilts.
The Arabs and Yanks will love it.

--
Regards
Bob
In Runnymede, 17 miles West of London


 
Back
Top