Just a random question that will make me sound stupid.

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The FACT is no engine likes back preasure, thats a fact, the quicker the gas can leave the engine the quicker the air and fuel can get in, giving better higher rev range performance, what is important is the size/length of the ptimary and secondary exhaust pipes and collector merge angle (headers and down pipes) and how they are configard to stop pulsing back to other cylinders.

There's a hell of a lot to manifold design peeps, and I aint no expert!!!!
 
Hmmm.. I still dont but it that if I stall my car and the exhaust is under water I'll suck water up... I recon that b*llocks.. if its true boat that have exhausts that exit under water wouldn't work
 
Hmmm.. I still dont but it that if I stall my car and the exhaust is under water I'll suck water up... I recon that b*llocks.. if its true boat that have exhausts that exit under water wouldn't work
If the water is up to your bonnet then yes you will fill the exhaust and the engine with water, if the water is only up to the rear silencer then it will only fill up as far as the bend where it goes over the axle if memory serves me correctly thats quite high.
As for sucking water up the exhaust unlikly, you do get a bit of suck from the exhaust when starting (cranking) but you get a lot more blow.
Im sure that if it was a problem or a concern some of the off roaders on LZ would have fitted exhaust stacks to there landys.
 
does it not just boil down to the same reason we use wading plugs and extended breathers (hot versus cold senario)?

when something hot (engine) goes into something cold (water) the water will be sucked in or something like that ;) at least with the engine running the water will be pushed out by the exhaust gasses.

Not a very technical description i know but it is still early for me :eek:
 
back pressure is key to the smooth running of most injuns.Makes ya laff wen ya see chavy types with big bore exhuasts that probbaly rob 5 or ten horse power

You are right, a bore that is too big for the car can decrease performance. But that does not quite mean that cars need the back pressure itself.

The FACT is no engine likes back preasure, thats a fact, the quicker the gas can leave the engine the quicker the air and fuel can get in, giving better higher rev range performance,

Yes, but as to not confuse people, it does not mean that exhaust gases can always leave quicker because the bore is bigger...not saying that engines like back pressure though. Just that because engines do not need back pressure as such, that does not mean it makes sense to do your best to reduce back pressure (i.e big bore or short exhaust)

No engines need it and one of the causes of it on a t/c engine is the turbo its self.

They do not need the back pressure as such...but that in turn does not mean the bigger the bore the better...because you get to a certain bore size where the pulsing effect off the exhaust gases cannot happen correctly.

It also does not mean that on Turbo cars the bigger the bore the better. Turbo cars generally have a higher flow (or pulsing pressure) than n/a cars. But that is not to say that the bigger the bore the better, because you still need to right size for pulsing to occur.

So why do some race/drag cars not have a long exhaust like a road car then? Different rules apply for very high output running just headers for instance...but a low boost, low RPM pressure, Land Rover Diesel turbo engine is not! So still needs a matched bore, not just the biggest.
 
Quote:
back pressure is key to the smooth running of most injuns.Makes ya laff wen ya see chavy types with big bore exhuasts that probbaly rob 5 or ten horse power

You are right, a bore that is too big for the car can decrease performance. But that does not quite mean that cars need the back pressure itself.


Quote:
The FACT is no engine likes back preasure, thats a fact, the quicker the gas can leave the engine the quicker the air and fuel can get in, giving better higher rev range performance,

Yes, but as to not confuse people, it does not mean that exhaust gases can always leave quicker because the bore is bigger...not saying that engines like back pressure though. Just that because engines do not need back pressure as such, that does not mean it makes sense to do your best to reduce back pressure (i.e big bore or short exhaust)
Thats true the pipes have to be the correct size to small=high back preasure to large=slower gas speed which if the primary pipes are to short causes the gas to stall and get sucked back into the cylinder, for that same reason you dont have cyl 1 and 3 (on a 4 cyl engine with firing order of 1,3,4,2) going to the same collector also the primary pipe must be the same length.:biggrin1:
Quote:

No engines need it and one of the causes of it on a t/c engine is the turbo its self.

They do not need the back pressure as such...but that in turn does not mean the bigger the bore the better...because you get to a certain bore size where the pulsing effect off the exhaust gases cannot happen correctly.

It also does not mean that on Turbo cars the bigger the bore the better. Turbo cars generally have a higher flow (or pulsing pressure) than n/a cars. But that is not to say that the bigger the bore the better, because you still need to right size for pulsing to occur.

So why do some race/drag cars not have a long exhaust like a road car then? Different rules apply for very high output running just headers for instance...but a low boost, low RPM pressure, Land Rover Diesel turbo engine is not! So still needs a matched bore, not just the biggest.
 
Back
Top