On or around Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:41:21 +0100, "Badger"
<
[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>On the other hand, if you must fit a diesel, may I recommend a substantial
>budgetary increase to accommodate a BMW 3.0 diesel with matching 5 speed
>autobox, mated somehow to a landy transfer box? I've got one of these
>engines in it's original car as produced (330dSE Sport Auto, don't stone me
>or send me to coventry, please!), and it's awesome. I've always wondered
>what it would do for my 110 with it's 184bhp and 288lbft. Chippable to
>224bhp and 330lbft, by the way! I always return to sanity by following the
>advice given above. My doctor says I'm all better now, just! Another cup of
>earl grey, vicar?..........
yer need their new one, as reported in CAR magazine. 3-litre, still, but
twin-turbo, they claim 272BHP @ 4400RPM, 413LBFT @ 2000RPM. 14Kg heavier
than the single-turbo one.
Vauxhall, using similar technology, claim 212BHP @ 4500RPM, 295LBFT @
1400RPM, from, would you believe, a 1.9 four-pot. That'd make a nice engine
for a freeloader... In fact, it'd make a nice engine for a disco, an' all.
Vauxhall say it's only a concept, at the moment, but expect somethign
similar on the market in under 2 years.
bloody impressive figures, however you look at 'em.
thinking on, OP mentions the Land cruiser engine, now if you got the 4.2
turbo version assuming it'll fit, it'd be quite an impressive beast.
--
Austin Shackles.
www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
If all be true that I do think, There are five reasons we should drink;
Good wine, a friend, or being dry, Or lest we should be by and by;
Or any other reason why. - Henry Aldrich (1647 - 1710)