I am still not able to post for some reason, please could you post this on my behalf,
Hi All,
I am more than happy to discuss these issues and be totally open with you,
Yes we have had quality issues in the past and I have made some very expensive mistakes in both monetary terms and reputation but we have always tried our best to resolve issues with the customer in a fair manor and learn from these mistakes,
In the last 18 months we have had 2 reoccurring warranty issues :
1) The moly coating flaking off some LT77 baulk rings, causing poor shifts, looked fine on inspection but after approx 3-4 months the coating started to come off due to poor bonding by the manufacturer, baulk rings were quarantined as soon as the problem was recognized and we switched supplier,
2) Our usual supplier ran out of a bearing for the LT230 intermediate pin and the replacement ones came in unbranded and the goods in guy didn't notice, they went on the shelf and were used, these turned out to be no good and we started to see failures within 3 months, again parts were quarantined as soon as the problem was recognized.
I don't think either of these issues are related to the failures discussed in this thread but I can't be sure as I have no details of these failures as yet.
There is no truth in me sacking a member of staff for sabotaging gearboxes.
We do not replace all parts when rebuilding units or this would not be 'rebuilding' it would be 'assembling new' and the far higher cost would reflect this.
Our company stance when a unit fails after 12 months is never 'tough it's out of warranty', we offer what we call an 'at cost repair' this means if you bring the box to us we do the labour free of charge and charge the parts at cost, a typical repair is either FOC or upto £ 100. This is what we would offer to both Jai and Phil if they wanted to bring the boxes to us.
Regards
Dave Ashcroft
I should add that the Highlighting is not on the original from DA, but my doing.