Word to the wise

A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
at the expense of taxpayers.

"Mother" <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
> owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
> at the expense of taxpayers.
this would be the same person fond of namecalling various members in the
group I look forward to his first post shortly followed by a govt crackdown
and re-arrest
Derek

Mother wrote:
> A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
> owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
> at the expense of taxpayers.

Thanks for the heads up.

I wonder ,when it comes back online, what name it will use!

On 2006-07-12, Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote:

> A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
> owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
> at the expense of taxpayers.

Would this be a certain "Mr Duckbill" or similar? If so one of the
websites about him says he was sentenced to 2 years on 5th April
2006. Not sure how accurate that is.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

>> A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
>> owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
>> at the expense of taxpayers.
>
> Would this be a certain "Mr Duckbill" or similar? If so one of the
> websites about him says he was sentenced to 2 years on 5th April
> 2006. Not sure how accurate that is.

Sounds accurate enough to me - sentenced to 2 years, serves 3 months.

Matt

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:58:14 +0200, Matthew Maddock
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Sounds accurate enough to me - sentenced to 2 years, serves 3 months.

The substantial amount of time spent on remand counts toward the final
term.

>> Sounds accurate enough to me - sentenced to 2 years, serves 3 months.
>
> The substantial amount of time spent on remand counts toward the final
> term.

Unfortunately!

What did he do?


Matthew Maddock wrote:
> >> Sounds accurate enough to me - sentenced to 2 years, serves 3 months.
> >
> > The substantial amount of time spent on remand counts toward the final
> > term.
>
> Unfortunately!

On 2006-07-13, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> What did he do?

If it's the same chap I'm thinking of;

http://www.luckwill.com/

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

Mother" <"@ {mother} @ wrote:
> A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
> owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
> at the expense of taxpayers.

Hello,

Bit of a newby-lurker, but anyone care to elaborate - sounds like juicy
gossip? )

Ta,

Nick

Nick wrote:
> Mother" <"@ {mother} @ wrote:
>> A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
>> owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
>> at the expense of taxpayers.
>
> Hello,
>
> Bit of a newby-lurker, but anyone care to elaborate - sounds like juicy
> gossip? )
>
> Ta,
>
> Nick
>
>

Nothing pleasant, I'm afraid. Just the facts about a rock-spider.

K

--
"Sometimes I think I have a Guardian Idiot - a little invisible spirit
just behind my shoulder, looking out for me ... only he's an imbecile" -
Jake Stonebender

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 23:32, Mother ["@ {mother} @"@101fc.net] wrote in
message <[email protected]>

> A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
> owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
> at the expense of taxpayers.

Ever seen the film "Hard Candy"?

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:32:14 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net>
scribbled the following nonsense:

>A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
>owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
>at the expense of taxpayers.

Oh dear..... Surely he will soon be in dire need of another holiday
though???
--

Simon Isaacs

"Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote"
George Jean Nathan (1882-1955)

ROT13 me....

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:21:03 +0100, Simon Isaacs
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Oh dear..... Surely he will soon be in dire need of another holiday
>though???

Unconfirmed reports that he was re-arrested at the gates. Awaiting
more information (have to be sure of anything that is made public, for
obvious reasons). Other reports that he has not been re-arrested, and
has been 'active', including 'here'. All sources of information are
kept confidential, even I don't know who /I/ am...

On or around Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:55:51 +0100, "Nick"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>Mother" <"@ {mother} @ wrote:
>> A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
>> owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
>> at the expense of taxpayers.
>
>Hello,
>
>Bit of a newby-lurker, but anyone care to elaborate - sounds like juicy
>gossip? )

see website mentioned in this thread.

--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"Festina Lente" (Hasten slowly) Suetonius (c.70-c.140) Augustus, 25

On or around Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:21:27 +0200, Matthew Maddock
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>>> Sounds accurate enough to me - sentenced to 2 years, serves 3 months.
>>
>> The substantial amount of time spent on remand counts toward the final
>> term.
>
>Unfortunately!

I don't have so much problem with that as with a 1/3 remission of sentence
for pleading guilty. WTF is that all about?

If you're guilty, you're guilty, and the sentence should be the same
irrespective of plea.

but if you're locked up on remand (i.e no bail) for 2 years before they
bring you to trial and then get sentenced to 6 months, (to invent an extreme
example) then you've actually been "inside" for 4 times as long as the
sentence handed down and it's only right and proper that you get out
immediately.

as to whether the sentence is valid for the crime, that's a totally
different question.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"Festina Lente" (Hasten slowly) Suetonius (c.70-c.140) Augustus, 25

On or around Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:32:14 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother}
@"@101fc.net> enlightened us thusly:

>A previous 'regular' hereabouts, who is legally banned for life from
>owning a computer or camera, has just finished their latest 'holiday'
>at the expense of taxpayers.

mind I gather that this time it wasn't our taxes but those of the
inhabitants of a country slightly west of here.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"Festina Lente" (Hasten slowly) Suetonius (c.70-c.140) Augustus, 25

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:30:15 +0100, Austin Shackles
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On or around Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:21:27 +0200, Matthew Maddock
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
>>>> Sounds accurate enough to me - sentenced to 2 years, serves 3 months.
>>>
>>> The substantial amount of time spent on remand counts toward the final
>>> term.
>>
>> Unfortunately!
>
> I don't have so much problem with that as with a 1/3 remission of
> sentence
> for pleading guilty. WTF is that all about?
>
> If you're guilty, you're guilty, and the sentence should be the same
> irrespective of plea.

It's a stick to beat those that can't afford quality representation.

--
William Tasso

Land Rover - 110 V8
Discovery - V8

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:30:53 +0100, Austin Shackles
<[email protected]> wrote:


> ...
> I gather that this time it wasn't our taxes but those of the
> inhabitants of a country slightly west of here.

Cornwall?

--
William Tasso

Land Rover - 110 V8
Discovery - V8

On 2006-07-13, Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:

> mind I gather that this time it wasn't our taxes but those of the
> inhabitants of a country slightly west of here.

Perhaps we should send him slightly further west: *splosh*

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!