That's the 'Unloved' 19J Engine; and by the look of the turbo location & manifold, probably a genuine 110 variant, rather than one out of an old post office Sherpa.
Was ONLY ever fitted to the 90 & 110; never went into a Series III, they got 2.25's in petrol or diesel giuse, or six packs in some LWB's.
Which is a good point, being an ambulance, may be worth doing some mechanical archeology.
As an ambulance, guess its a military spec landy, but given age and years of civilian service, and a blaringly obviouse departue from standard in the motor thats currently in there, could be any number of deviations from original variants.
First of all, I think I'd want to know whether it was originally a 1-ton.
- Six cylinder, inlet over exhaust, petrol engine
- lower ratio gear box & transfer
- extended spring hangers and shackles
- 9.00 sized tyres
- modified bulkhead for clearance at the back of longer engine
Next; military departures
Most mil models used 1-ton's HD chassis and extended hanger suspension, to which they added a bolt on cross member, though they often kept the four cyl engines and bulkhead. But being a heavy ambulance it MAY have been a six pot.
Ambulances I think also often got a rear anti-roll bar, becouse of the weight carried high over the back axle, as well as a lot stiffer springs.
Then there is the matter of whether it might have had 24v electrics.
Now IF it was originally a six cyl.... first you already have a part modded bulkhead with more clerance, which may make life a bit easier for a conversion.
BUT, you may also like to think about 'restoring' it to six cyl motivation if it was. Engine had about 85bhp, which was only 5bhp of the mark of the Stage 1 V8's, and though they were reputed to be 'thirsty' no more so than a V8.
Be an interesting 'project', and the main draw-back would be actually finding a motor to begin with, but they are about.
Trying to see from the pic, but cant tell. Motor looks very 'tight' to the bulkhead at the back, which suggests six cyl, but at the same time, there doesn't seem to be the gap between the water-pump and rad. I had a 4-pot in a six-cyl, and there were about three or four inches between the fan and the radiator, where the extra two pots should have been!
Given that ambulance body, its 'needs' 90+bhp to make it shift at anything like modern road velocities, and it is NEVER going to be particularly ecconomical.
BUT, I'm wondering; given the weight of the thing, might have been given the lower ratio 1-ton gear-box to help move so much bulk & mass; possibly excaserbated by smaller sized tyres.
So, EVEN with a decent 'power-up' curtecy of that TD, might still be gearing limited; so reving the nuts off that 19J motor might not have helped its already questionable longevity, and may be worth some thought before pondering alternative power-up via V8 or anything.
Not sure where I'm going with this, other than, principle of measure twice, cut once, and for a rapid turn-around, might be worth identifying where any anomolies may lie before you are surrounded by nuts and bolts and spanners, pondering unforseen 'problems'......