Under pigeon, but better than P38 ones!

bencorkill

Well-Known Member

Posts

2,426

Location

barnet , north london

• Sep 2, 2013

• #1

i know it is terrible, but i think the back from side on actually has potential. But when looking direct at it looks turd. Still i think its a better effort than a P38 to L322. On auto trader , think its £5500 and 80k on clock. Opinions ?

 

M

myfirstl322

Well-Known Member

Posts

41,354

Location

Hoots mon...

• Sep 2, 2013

• #2

Phoarrr, look at the zorsts on that

 

2.0_hippo

Well-Known Member

Posts

6,069

Location

Hertfordshire

• Sep 2, 2013

• #3

looks plain wrong !

 

Grit Valve

2000 4.6 Vouge

Posts

12,465

Location

Plaistow

• Sep 2, 2013

• #4

Omfg !
Now that sad

 

bencorkill

Well-Known Member

Posts

2,426

Location

barnet , north london

• Sep 2, 2013

• #5

Now im not saying it looks good atall, put compared to a p38 conversion i think the back looks alot better. But not as good as standard

 

martynv8

Well-Known Member

Posts

2,258

Location

Sheffield

• Sep 2, 2013

• #6

wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.....just wrong!

 

Chrisfrain2007

Active Member

Posts

958

Location

Telford

• Sep 3, 2013

• #7

I thought it was sacrilege to do it to a p38, but to do this to a classic is much worse!

 

goonarmy

Beer tester

LZIR Despatch Agent

Posts

45,367

Location

Hornchurch

• Sep 3, 2013

• #8

The front grill is ok. The rest offends me.

 

lorri789

Well-Known Member

Posts

4,657

Location

West Stirlingshire

• Sep 4, 2013

• #9

Looks awful.

 

norseman

Well-Known Member

Posts

3,372

Location

Essex - UK

• Sep 5, 2013

• #10

The cost of the conversion probably came close to price of an early L322. How to ruin a Classic in one easy lesson & as someone who owns a RRC largely because of it's timeless style I find this trash 'upgrade' particulary offensive.

 

gold rover

Well-Known Member

Posts

10,583

Location

dùthaich Dhè fèin

• Sep 5, 2013

• #11

uke: Just wrong

 

M

myfirstl322

Well-Known Member

Posts

41,354

Location

Hoots mon...

• Sep 5, 2013

• #12

gold rover said:

uke: Just wrong

Click to expand...

Exactly my thoughts on seeing yours...No offence like..

 

lorri789

Well-Known Member

Posts

4,657

Location

West Stirlingshire

• Sep 5, 2013

• #13

norseman said:

The cost of the conversion probably came close to price of an early L322. How to ruin a Classic in one easy lesson & as someone who owns a RRC largely because of it's timeless style I find this trash 'upgrade' particulary offensive.

Click to expand...

Not a truer word mate. Why wreck a piece of art?

 

wammers

No longer with us, RIP

Donater

Posts

58,170

Location

Preston Lancs.

• Sep 6, 2013

• #14

Yeah nobody should add parts to a classic. In particular if they are ferrous. There is enough stuff on them to rot away as it is.