T
Tim Hobbs
Guest
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:27:53 +1000, "Samuel"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Well Tim, they certainly don't make them like the used to. put my '73 164
>volvo against my S3 head to head, i dont reckon there would be a great deal
>of difference. both built like brick ****houses and both way almost exactly
>the same.
>
>Sam.
>
Aye, and to be honest I wouldn't want to crash in either. Weight
counts for a lot, but the way a car absorbs energy is the important
thing, not how it looks after the crash.
If I was going to have an accident with my 2 year old in the back?
I'd take my Volvo over FiL's Mazda every time, not to mention over
most Land Rovers ever made.
I'm still getting a lot of stick. To add insult to injury my
father-in-law is, as the third party, getting a courtesy car whilst
they touch up his bumper. I'm off the road for 9 days with only the
offer of a special price on a hire car. Hurrrumph...
--
Tim Hobbs
'58 Series 2 88" aka "Stig"
'77 101FC Ambulance aka "Burrt"
'03 Volvo V70
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Well Tim, they certainly don't make them like the used to. put my '73 164
>volvo against my S3 head to head, i dont reckon there would be a great deal
>of difference. both built like brick ****houses and both way almost exactly
>the same.
>
>Sam.
>
Aye, and to be honest I wouldn't want to crash in either. Weight
counts for a lot, but the way a car absorbs energy is the important
thing, not how it looks after the crash.
If I was going to have an accident with my 2 year old in the back?
I'd take my Volvo over FiL's Mazda every time, not to mention over
most Land Rovers ever made.
I'm still getting a lot of stick. To add insult to injury my
father-in-law is, as the third party, getting a courtesy car whilst
they touch up his bumper. I'm off the road for 9 days with only the
offer of a special price on a hire car. Hurrrumph...
--
Tim Hobbs
'58 Series 2 88" aka "Stig"
'77 101FC Ambulance aka "Burrt"
'03 Volvo V70