- Posts
- 16,494
- Location
- Benfleet, Essex
I recently treated myself to one of the RF filter devices for Range Rover P38 “V1 and V2” RF receivers. I got it from p38webshop which is run by our friend and colleague on this board MartyUK.
OK, why did I buy it when I already had a <£10 “Jog-Unit” in place; as this essentially makes the Revision 1 & 2 RF receivers totally “deaf” until you “jog” it?
My reasons were:
1. That the jog unit I had employed had no ‘tell-tale’ to indicate whether it was engaged or not; and I found myself continually doubting whether it was “ON” and the RF unit was therefore disabled or “Off” and my battery was at risk of being drained.
2. I found myself trying to unlock/lock my car with my fob far more frequently in order to test whether the Jog unit was on or off.
3. I kept getting inconsistent results with the “one-two” combination of “Press Jog-Unit” then “Press Unlock on my keyfob” which led to doubts as to status.
4. The jog unit was yet another “fob” on and already busy and bulky keyring.
5. I wanted the convenience of a working Revision 3 Landrover RF unit without paying the ridiculous Landrover price.
OK, so that was my reasoning for buying the RF filter @ £79.99 + P&P.
Was it hard to fit?
No, it comes with a plug and socket exactly the same as those of the RF-Unit itself and so is a simple unplug-re-plug in series operation. A supplied cable-tie tethers the RF-Filter to the RF-Unit or to the metalwork in the vicinity.
Does It Work?
I am very pleased to report that …Yes it does!
My Range Rover is parked in close proximity (<20 feet) to 3 Wireless door-bells and a Garage door opener that all operate on 433Mhz. Knowing that pressing my doorbell also trips my neighbour’s chime-unit is a testament to the swamped RF interference that used to flatten my battery.
Sure, the “Jog-Unit” switched the RF receiver “off” but ensuring what state things were in and getting reliable “pop & go” of my door locks was inconsistent with the Jog-Unit & key fob combo.
Not so with the RF filter and the fob, it’s so very much better.
I have no affiliation with the supplier, this is just my honest view, I’d rather spend this modest amount than the exorbitant ransom value LR want to charge to eradicate a problem of their own making.
OK, why did I buy it when I already had a <£10 “Jog-Unit” in place; as this essentially makes the Revision 1 & 2 RF receivers totally “deaf” until you “jog” it?
My reasons were:
1. That the jog unit I had employed had no ‘tell-tale’ to indicate whether it was engaged or not; and I found myself continually doubting whether it was “ON” and the RF unit was therefore disabled or “Off” and my battery was at risk of being drained.
2. I found myself trying to unlock/lock my car with my fob far more frequently in order to test whether the Jog unit was on or off.
3. I kept getting inconsistent results with the “one-two” combination of “Press Jog-Unit” then “Press Unlock on my keyfob” which led to doubts as to status.
4. The jog unit was yet another “fob” on and already busy and bulky keyring.
5. I wanted the convenience of a working Revision 3 Landrover RF unit without paying the ridiculous Landrover price.
OK, so that was my reasoning for buying the RF filter @ £79.99 + P&P.
Was it hard to fit?
No, it comes with a plug and socket exactly the same as those of the RF-Unit itself and so is a simple unplug-re-plug in series operation. A supplied cable-tie tethers the RF-Filter to the RF-Unit or to the metalwork in the vicinity.
Does It Work?
I am very pleased to report that …Yes it does!
My Range Rover is parked in close proximity (<20 feet) to 3 Wireless door-bells and a Garage door opener that all operate on 433Mhz. Knowing that pressing my doorbell also trips my neighbour’s chime-unit is a testament to the swamped RF interference that used to flatten my battery.
Sure, the “Jog-Unit” switched the RF receiver “off” but ensuring what state things were in and getting reliable “pop & go” of my door locks was inconsistent with the Jog-Unit & key fob combo.
Not so with the RF filter and the fob, it’s so very much better.
I have no affiliation with the supplier, this is just my honest view, I’d rather spend this modest amount than the exorbitant ransom value LR want to charge to eradicate a problem of their own making.