Re: Re: WTD: 88" chassis

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
A

Alex

Guest
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:28:43 +0100 (BST), [email protected]
("David G. Bell") wrote:

>On Thursday, in article
> <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "Pete Foster" wrote:
>
>> Help!
>>
>> I finally got round to taking the tub off my SWB SIII last night. Not a
>> pretty sight!
>>
>> Soooo, anybody in the Yorkshire area (UK) got an 88" chassis they need to
>> get rid off, preferably in better condition than mine. I'll even consider a
>> RR classic one with a view to shortening it.
>>
>> Unfortunately it has to be cheap. Not my choice, but SWMBO has spoken.

>
>Reading this, it occurs to me that there must be some info, somewhere on
>the web, detailing just where the joints between old and now are on a
>half-chassis. Because replacing a chassis seems to be one of those
>things with pitfalls on the vehicle licensing side.


Not necessarily.

DVLA:
Cars must use

1. The original unmodified chassis or unaltered bodyshell (i.e. body
and chassis as one unit - monocoque); or
or
2.A new chassis or monocoque bodyshell of the same specification as
the original supported by evidence from the dealer/manufacturer (e.g.
receipt)

And two other major components
Blah blah blah


So if you use an original design chassis (or indeed half chassis) in
your rebuild then I cannot see why there is a problem.

The easiest solution, as always, is not to tell em :D

Alex
 
Back
Top