posting problem

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Sep 19, 2005

• #21

On or around Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:11:16 +0100, Tom Woods
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:03:38 +0100, Austin Shackles
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>>>
>>>>>tub fi ew lla detrats gnittup ruo txet morf eht rehto edis ti dluow eb a
>>>>>hctib ot daer os elpoep ekat on eciton soc s'ti oot drah oot ekam ecnes
>>>>>fo.
>>>>
>>>> Vs jr nyy jebgr yvxr guvf gura gur crbcyr hfvat bhgybbx (jub trarenyyl
>>>> frrz gb or gur gbc cbfgref gbb) zbfg yvxryl pbhyqag ernq vg nf v org
>>>> gurl qbag unir gur evtug ohggbaf!
>>>>
>>>
>>>Yep outlook has it.
>>>
>>
>>ew ahev a htnig ni hte hsde nkwon sa ubddrcpyt, faetr hte nievtnro.
>
>inec! -
>
>owlud eb vene ebttre fi uyo oclud dad a iftlre niot ganet ot rtnalstae
>ti uaotamigaclly ofr uyo.

heh . best thign about it is that it's readable with a bit of effort
without filters. 'course, yer cebcre sheddi can read and type EBG-13
without rssbeg, especially the words which refer to such unsheddi activity
as uneq jbex or fcrnqvat zbarl.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Satisfying: Satisfy your inner child by eating ten tubes of Smarties
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #22

On or around Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:18:43 +0100, Austin Shackles
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>fcrnqvat

I meant, of course, fcraqvat.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Blue: The sky is blue for a reason. Blue light is a source of strength
and harmony in the cosmos. Create a blue light in your life by
telephoning the police
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.

 

L

Lee_D

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #23

"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On or around Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:18:43 +0100, Austin Shackles
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
>>fcrnqvat
>
> I meant, of course, fcraqvat.

sb bpehrf gv bpyhq rtg rile bpycfvgnqr. ragk gftnr bjyhq ro bg hcg gv av bg
bzfer abrp arbprqq.

:-D

Lee D

 

E

EMB

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #24

Lee_D wrote:

> sb bpehrf gv bpyhq rtg rile bpycfvgnqr. ragk gftnr bjyhq ro bg hcg gv av bg
> bzfer abrp arbprqq.

.... --- -- . - .... .. -. --. .-.. .. -.- . - .... .. ... - .... . -.


--
EMB

 

R

Ric Norris

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #25

What a load of complete crap.

And you people complain about top/bottom posting. Bunch of dickheads....ALL
of yer.

Ric Norris.
Brisbane. Australia.
http://users.bigpond.net.au/cavedrawings


"EMB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Lee_D wrote:
>
>> sb bpehrf gv bpyhq rtg rile bpycfvgnqr. ragk gftnr bjyhq ro bg hcg gv av
>> bg bzfer abrp arbprqq.
>
> ... --- -- . - .... .. -. --. .-.. .. -.- . - .... .. ... - .... . -.
>
>
> --
> EMB

 

L

Lee_D

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #26

"EMB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Lee_D wrote:
>
>> sb bpehrf gv bpyhq rtg rile bpycfvgnqr. ragk gftnr bjyhq ro bg hcg gv av
>> bg bzfer abrp arbprqq.
>
> ... --- -- . - .... .. -. --. .-.. .. -.- . - .... .. ... - .... . -.
>
>
> --
> EMB

-.-- . .- .... / - .... .- - ... / - .... . / -... .- -... -.--

Lee D

 

L

Lee_D

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #27

"Ric Norris" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> What a load of complete crap.
>
> And you people complain about top/bottom posting. Bunch of
> dickheads....ALL of yer.
>
> Ric Norris.
> Brisbane. Australia.
> http://users.bigpond.net.au/cavedrawings

<PLONK>

 

R

Richard

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #28

I didnt realise there was a prob with either top or bottom posting until
someone made a fuss about it. Would have been nice if they were polite tho.



"Andy.Smalley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "EMB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> the ickys wrote:
>>> At the risk of providing evidence that I'm not particularly PC savvy -
>>> what is this 'top posting' and bottom posting' all about?
>>
>> Replying at the top or the bottom of the message.
>>
>>> Do I post 'top' or 'bottom'? How do you change it?
>>
>> Use a decent newsreader or if you're really intent on using Outlook
>> Express then download OE-Quotefix from
>> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix
>>
>>>
>>> Does it really annoy people that much?
>>>
>> Yes... that much and more. Sort of a bit like driving the wrong way down
>> the motorway.
>>
>> --
>> EMB
>
> I can't understand the problem people have with outlook express
> I use it I just cut and paste my name/ sig
> Yes top posting does annoy a lot of people I used to top post
> but when in Rome and all that
> Bottom posting works as long as people remember to snip previous posts
> it makes the posts manageable and readable
> Most of the time people don't have a problem with top posters
> until they says f**k you I'm top posting come what may
>
> --
> Andy
>
> SWB Series 2a ( dressed as a 3) "Bruce"
> It's big, it's mean it's really, really green
>

 

L

Lee_D

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #29

"Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I didnt realise there was a prob with either top or bottom posting until
>someone made a fuss about it. Would have been nice if they were polite tho.
>
>

FFS! This repetative bollocks about frigging top posting causes me to
envisage someone wearing a dog outfit sat at a keyboard.....

http://www.policeguide.com/fries.wmv

I mean, would you blatantly **** in a swimming pool because you can even
knowing it gets on peoples tits?

http://txc.net.au/~mapie/LifeGuardinthePool.wmv

Lee D

 

M

Mother

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #30

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:26:29 GMT, "Richard" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>I didnt realise there was a prob with either top or bottom posting until
>someone made a fuss about it. Would have been nice if they were polite tho.

I say old chap, would you care to place your worthless, off-topic
replies below correctly edited, quoted text?

Ta very much, thanks for the time...

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #31

On or around Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:29:25 +0100, "Lee_D"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On or around Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:18:43 +0100, Austin Shackles
>> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>>
>>>fcrnqvat
>>
>> I meant, of course, fcraqvat.
>
>sb bpehrf gv bpyhq rtg rile bpycfvgnqr. ragk gftnr bjyhq ro bg hcg gv av bg
>bzfer abrp arbprqq.
>
>:-D

silly sod. Mind, it happens, that's how we ended up with "hooter" as a
synonym for "bugger". someone did ubggre, and someone else rotted it to
hotter, and someone else else misread that as hooter.


Hooter is rather good though. handy for use in polite company, along with
penc, and can readily be interpreted from context without being obviously
rood.

e.g. "Some hooter has filled the back of me land rover with penc"
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"There are three sorts of people in the world - those who can count,
and those who can't" (Anon)

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #32

On or around Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:40:07 GMT, "Ric Norris" <[email protected]>
enlightened us thusly:

>What a load of complete crap.
>
>And you people complain about top/bottom posting. Bunch of dickheads....ALL
>of yer.

ferfexache, lighten up willya?
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"There are three sorts of people in the world - those who can count,
and those who can't" (Anon)

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #33

On or around Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:57:06 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother}
@"@101fc.net> enlightened us thusly:

>On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:26:29 GMT, "Richard" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>I didnt realise there was a prob with either top or bottom posting until
>>someone made a fuss about it. Would have been nice if they were polite tho.
>
>I say old chap, would you care to place your worthless, off-topic
>replies below correctly edited, quoted text?
>
>Ta very much, thanks for the time...

see, he *can* do "polite".

you back off the cut, now, then?
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Satisfying: Satisfy your inner child by eating ten tubes of Smarties
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.

 

M

Mother

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #34

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:29:10 +0100, Austin Shackles
<[email protected]> wrote:

>see, he *can* do "polite".

Gracious me, perish the thought that any clueless ****wit could
possibly think otherwise (blush)...

>you back off the cut, now, then?

Yeah, sadly... From the cut directly into the thrust you could say.

Charlotte has now agreed to a Vampire _or_ a Narrowboat.

Feckit, I think I need to reprogram her, just been offered a radbod!

 

R

Richard

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #35

"Mother" <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:26:29 GMT, "Richard" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>I didnt realise there was a prob with either top or bottom posting until
>>someone made a fuss about it. Would have been nice if they were polite
>>tho.
>
> I say old chap, would you care to place your worthless, off-topic
> replies below correctly edited, quoted text?
>
> Ta very much, thanks for the time...


For what its worth, my worthless, off topic replies were all started by
someone else who got the arse about it all. I am as much ****ed off as
anyone about all this ****. This was a good newsgroup in the past. I have
helped people with questions regarding their Land Rovers and like wise I
have had help from people with problems with my Discovery and 90. Shame.

 

T

Tom Woods

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #36

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:56:18 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net>
wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:29:10 +0100, Austin Shackles
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>see, he *can* do "polite".
>
>Gracious me, perish the thought that any clueless ****wit could
>possibly think otherwise (blush)...
>
>>you back off the cut, now, then?
>
>Yeah, sadly... From the cut directly into the thrust you could say.
>
>Charlotte has now agreed to a Vampire _or_ a Narrowboat.
>
>Feckit, I think I need to reprogram her, just been offered a radbod!

I'm sure that i've seen a picture somewhere of a boat using a
landrover roof as a cabin.
What you need is a 101 with a knackered chassis and a tatty narrowboat
with a sound hull..

 

T

Tim Hobbs

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #37

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:26:43 GMT, "Richard" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"Mother" <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:26:29 GMT, "Richard" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I didnt realise there was a prob with either top or bottom posting until
>>>someone made a fuss about it. Would have been nice if they were polite
>>>tho.
>>
>> I say old chap, would you care to place your worthless, off-topic
>> replies below correctly edited, quoted text?
>>
>> Ta very much, thanks for the time...
>
>
>For what its worth, my worthless, off topic replies were all started by
>someone else who got the arse about it all. I am as much ****ed off as
>anyone about all this ****. This was a good newsgroup in the past. I have
>helped people with questions regarding their Land Rovers and like wise I
>have had help from people with problems with my Discovery and 90. Shame.
>

actually you brought it up in this thread.

You could always try getting over it....


--

Tim Hobbs

'58 Series 2 88" aka "Stig"
'03 Volvo V70

 

M

Mother

Guest

• Sep 20, 2005

• #38

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:26:43 GMT, "Richard" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>For what its worth, my worthless, off topic replies were all started by
>someone else who got the arse about it all.


The first post you made in this thread was:

-
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:05:55 GMT, "Richard" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>depends if you want to top post or bottom post. it seems if you top post
>certain people cant read...it !!!! ;-)
-

Which I believe, and I mention in a non-confrontational manner,
directly contradicts your statement above.


>I am as much ****ed off as anyone about all this ****.


I am therefore at a loss to understand why you thought it appropriate
to drag it all up again - unless it was (originally) meant as a
'lighthearted jovial quip', in which case it has been misinterpreted,
sadly.


>This was a good newsgroup in the past.


Implying that it isn't now?


>I have helped people with questions regarding their Land Rovers
>and like wise I have had help from people with problems with my
>Discovery and 90. Shame.


A couple of things spring to mind;

Firstly, you're in need of 'getting out more' if you take a little
newsgroup like this seriously - life has more, much more to offer.

Secondly, contributions are ALL valid, some help intentionally, others
hinder unintentionally, all are of equal value in the great bitbucket
above.

Finally, you're now apparently posting correctly, and I doubt anyone
will mind if you continue to do so.

You see, this is all a tiny piece of the interweb, tucked away from
normality in the Western spiral arm of the Galaxy, nobody really
cares, we all seek shares in an oil refinery, and we all make
mishtakes. Nobody died, live with it, be happy.

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Sep 21, 2005

• #39

On or around Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:58:41 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother}
@"@101fc.net> enlightened us thusly:

>Finally, you're now apparently posting correctly, and I doubt anyone
>will mind if you continue to do so.

indeed.
>
>You see, this is all a tiny piece of the interweb, tucked away from
>normality in the Western spiral arm of the Galaxy, nobody really
>cares, we all seek shares in an oil refinery, and we all make
>mishtakes. Nobody died, live with it, be happy.

including Richard Branson who said recently that he was going to build a
virgin oil refinery, or something. perhaps we could all offer to buy shares
in it provided he pledges to produce cheap fuel for our landies?
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"My centre is giving way, my right is in retreat; situation excellent.
I shall attack. - Marshal Foch (1851 - 1929)

 

S

Simon Isaacs

Guest

• Sep 21, 2005

• #40

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:56:18 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net>
scribbled the following nonsense:

>On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:29:10 +0100, Austin Shackles
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>see, he *can* do "polite".
>
>Gracious me, perish the thought that any clueless ****wit could
>possibly think otherwise (blush)...
>
>>you back off the cut, now, then?
>
>Yeah, sadly... From the cut directly into the thrust you could say.
>
>Charlotte has now agreed to a Vampire _or_ a Narrowboat.

result on both counts
>
>Feckit, I think I need to reprogram her, just been offered a radbod!

reprogram her so that she agrees to *both*.....
--

Simon Isaacs

Peterborough 4x4 Club Newsletter Editor and Webmaster
Green Lane Association (GLASS) Financial Director
101 Ambi, undsergoing camper conversion
Part owner of 1976 S3 LWT, Fully restored, ready for sale! Make me an offer!
Suzuki SJ410 (Wife's) 3" lift kit fitted, body shell now restored and mounted on chassis, waiting on a windscreen and MOT
Series 3 88" Rolling chassis...what to do next
1993 200 TDi Discovery
1994 200 TDi Discovery body sheel, being bobbed and modded.....
1979 Range Ruster body shell and chassis