ouch my eyes !!!

DreXeL said:

Looks more like a vinyl wrap than an actual paint job, so easily removed.

Click to expand...

the precurser to blue peters sticky back plastic and a class of 6 year olds.

cant see no empty bog rolls, or empty carboard tubes.....

but wait,
of course,
there glued to the bonnet,
how silly of me...:rofl:

You sure about a q ?

If its the 92 chassis with a td5 body and engine then its still a 92 with a new engine as far as I can gather. The parts replaced or swapped are the same just look nicer, so like for like really

Dr_evil said:

You sure about a q ?

If its the 92 chassis with a td5 body and engine then its still a 92 with a new engine as far as I can gather. The parts replaced or swapped are the same just look nicer, so like for like really

Click to expand...

Not 100% sure, but i believe that any 'vehicle built from multiple Origen' has to be on a Q plate as its not posable to put an age to the vehicle.?

I know you are meant to go Q plates for a galv chassis (so I have been told)

It's running on the TD5 chassis.. Not sure which bit is 92 lol

prior1188 said:

Not 100% sure, but i believe that any 'vehicle built from multiple Origen' has to be on a Q plate as its not posable to put an age to the vehicle.?

I know you are meant to go Q plates for a galv chassis (so I have been told)

Click to expand...

So the series 2a that my girlfriend owns should be a q then as it has a series 3 bulkhead and wings is what you're saying as should all series with defender front ends etc ?

If its the 92 chassis that's the vehicle Id, same with these ringers you see. They're a ringer cos they're using a 61 chassis number on a 2000 chassis it's a 2000 vehicle still just someone's a ####. With the 92 it should be a 92 if on the 92 chassis

prior1188 said:

It's running on the TD5 chassis.. Not sure which bit is 92 lol

Click to expand...

In that case it should be a td5 chassis number is why makes it a td5 so I presume he's just cut off the number and put on the 92 vin so its like a ringer. Presume it was to beat road tax a little as td5 are more to tax and would it make it lez compliant at 92 ?

Dr_evil said:

So the series 2a that my girlfriend owns should be a q then as it has a series 3 bulkhead and wings is what you're saying as should all series with defender front ends etc ?

If its the 92 chassis that's the vehicle Id, same with these ringers you see. They're a ringer cos they're using a 61 chassis number on a 2000 chassis it's a 2000 vehicle still just someone's a ####. With the 92 it should be a 92 if on the 92 chassis

Click to expand...

Like I said... Not 100% on the rulings, but if the chassis and running gear are the same then body panels I would think don't matter as to origin of the vehicle,(unless its a freelander on disco chassis lol) so your series should be fine

Dr_evil said:

In that case it should be a td5 chassis number is why makes it a td5 so I presume he's just cut off the number and put on the 92 vin so its like a ringer. Presume it was to beat road tax a little as td5 are more to tax and would it make it lez compliant at 92 ?

Click to expand...

Either way it looks to be a ringer.. Even worse is it has 21 bids on it so people obviously are clueless!! :0

prior1188 said:

Like I said... Not 100% on the rulings, but if the chassis and running gear are the same then body panels I would think don't matter as to origin of the vehicle,(unless its a freelander on disco chassis lol) so your series should be fine

Click to expand...

I know my series is fine it's registered as 1962 as it was built then but cast from the army in 72 managed to get the original reg iirc

But yes ringer on the td5 mongrel, and anyone bidding is a fool. No idea why you'd want something that looks like that anyway

Dr_evil said:

But yes ringer on the td5 mongrel, and anyone bidding is a fool. No idea why you'd want something that looks like that anyway

Click to expand...

I know!! At least everyone will see them coming... Even with the 'camo' paint job haha.

prior1188 said:

I know!! At least everyone will see them coming... Even with the 'camo' paint job haha.

Click to expand...

I definitely wouldn't take it shooting with me!



Wonder if its another job for the lz ebay team

I did have to snigger at what he describes as the "bad bits" :rofl:

Bromsgrove Defender said:

I did have to snigger at what he describes as the "bad bits" :rofl:

Click to expand...

Should just say

Bad bits..... RINGED/STOLEN

Lol

eewwwww that's not nice ...uke:uke:uke:uke:

prior1188 said:

Not 100% sure, but i believe that any 'vehicle built from multiple Origen' has to be on a Q plate as its not posable to put an age to the vehicle.?

I know you are meant to go Q plates for a galv chassis (so I have been told)

Click to expand...

If you replace a chassis with a new chassis, built to EXACTLY the same specification as the old one then you can transfer the plates and reg straight across from the old one, therefore, you can, 100% legally within every law, buy a new galvanised chassis to replace a worn out old one assuming they are identical.

You can't however have any modifications, so, no extra hangers for fuel tanks, different spring mounts, shorter, longer, etc.

The rest of it is done on a points scheme for if it should be Q plate or not (search, it's been covered millions of times) doesn't matter if you have an engine from a D1 and axles from a range rover on a series, if it's within the points and the chassis isn't altered.

in a word yuk

One thing that is good, is the speakers he put it. That looks nice a clean.