on the level

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
moremuckmush

moremuckmush

Well-Known Member
Posts
174
Location
Durham
The 110 pick up I have sits that bit higher at the back, I'm thinking this is how they left the factory? I think it would look better with the arches sitting more or less the same distance over the wheels ( front and rear ) , dont really want to lift the front and wondering if any of you guys have tackled the same issue and lowered the rear a tad ? cheers
 
moremuckmush said:
The 110 pick up I have sits that bit higher at the back, I'm thinking this is how they left the factory? I think it would look better with the arches sitting more or less the same distance over the wheels ( front and rear ) , dont really want to lift the front and wondering if any of you guys have tackled the same issue and lowered the rear a tad ? cheers
Click to expand...
Try and identify the springs. If they are genuine springs, they should have colour bands, and can be identified from the spring chart.

It may be that heavy duty springs have been fitted in the past. Forum consensus is that they are generally not needed, and will ruin your back.

So you could change them, or, like he says, ^^^^^^, couple of sacks of sand in the back will probably deal.
 
Yep understand the reasoning for the raised rear , can I simply find softer springs through lr parts or paddocks ?
 
Here’s a chart so you can see what is fitted to each model.
upload_2021-8-13_10-43-57.jpeg
 
So as a layman, I'm trying to figure out the best option to soften the rear looking at the charts, the existing springs at first glance are so rusty and paint has alas gone, so I'm lost as to confirm these are standard utility or heavy duty that's on there, do I plumb for a 90 utility spring or purchase a spring or obtain a 110 spring -50mm in height ?
 
moremuckmush said:
So as a layman, I'm trying to figure out the best option to soften the rear looking at the charts, the existing springs at first glance are so rusty and paint has alas gone, so I'm lost as to confirm these are standard utility or heavy duty that's on there, do I plumb for a 90 utility spring or purchase a spring or obtain a 110 spring -50mm in height ?
Click to expand...
somes pics below for an idea of where I'm at
 

Attachments

  • 20210811_183801.jpg
    20210811_183801.jpg
    294.5 KB · Views: 72
  • 20210811_183808.jpg
    20210811_183808.jpg
    364.9 KB · Views: 67
  • 20210811_183935.jpg
    20210811_183935.jpg
    399.9 KB · Views: 67
A mate ran his 110 on 90 rear's for a better ride as he did not carry heavy loads. However the spring diameter is less, easy enough to change axle spring pans but had weld pans into the larger 110 turret so springs would seat.
 
tottot said:
A mate ran his 110 on 90 rear's for a better ride as he did not carry heavy loads. However the spring diameter is less, easy enough to change axle spring pans but had weld pans into the larger 110 turret so springs would seat.
Click to expand...
Gotcha, there's always a knock on effect isn't there, welding isn't my forte and would like to tackle the job myself at home, I won't be carrying any weight , so no worries on that part , thanks for the feedback at least I now know the score
 
moremuckmush said:
somes pics below for an idea of where I'm at
Click to expand...

Looking at them photos, are you sure the problem isn’t the front springs are the wrong ones? The rear looks ok to me, but the front looks a bit low. Could just be the camera angle.

If you measure from your wheel arch to the centre of the wheel, post the dimension, and I will try and remember to do the same tomorrow. Post up all 4 wheels as they usually have different springs from left to righ.
 
So we are looking approx 100mm difference in height front to back , passenger side 540 rear 460 front
drivers side 560 rear 460 front
it's probably the line of the arch extension causing the difference in sizes , it actually rides well fairly bouncy but maybe just that tad hard at the rear , it's had new shocks and new bushes where needed which must help with the ride ,
 
moremuckmush said:
So we are looking approx 100mm difference in height front to back , passenger side 540 rear 460 front
drivers side 560 rear 460 front
it's probably the line of the arch extension causing the difference in sizes , it actually rides well fairly bouncy but maybe just that tad hard at the rear , it's had new shocks and new bushes where needed which must help with the ride ,
Click to expand...

Sorry, forgot to measure mine today. I will try and remember to do it in the morning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MAF Diver
Disco 2 Passenger side 1cm higher than driver's, how to level?
Replies
6
Views
645
Stanleysteamer
Stanleysteamer
dag019
Fitting YRM extended second row floor upstand
Replies
14
Views
809
dag019
dag019
MAF Diver
Disco 2 Do you need extended shocks for a 0.8 inch lift at the front? Air suspension in the back (SLS)
Replies
13
Views
1K
MAF Diver
MAF Diver
G
Small Holes in the Load Bay of Defender 110 Double-Cab
Replies
5
Views
506
dag019
dag019
Brenda__the__Defender
Advice on Tyre choice please!
Replies
14
Views
1K
Brenda__the__Defender
Brenda__the__Defender
Back
Top