slob
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 22,488
- Location
- Harrogate or London
how heavy would 100kgs of doosul be on a cold day?
My 90's leaning
- Thread starter adseybear
- Start date
This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
GRUNT
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 8,911
- Location
- On the lake Geneva shoreline.
Eh.
Why don't you measure the difference in height from side to side, compare it with the difference in length of the springs given in the chart thing I posted earlier. Then if the difference you have is way out, I reckon the springs are fooooked.
GRUNT
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 8,911
- Location
- On the lake Geneva shoreline.
bugger
Adz
New Member
- Posts
- 3,025
It's a nice try nobber, but it's bollox mate 
Diesel weighs a bit less than water - approx 7lBs per US gallon, 8.4lBs per imperial gallon or 0.84 Kgs/litre. Land Rover 90 tank is 55 litres so 46Kgs.
Exact calcs for diesel depend on the specific gravity - which changes through the year, typically, because of differing requirements for fuels in summer and winter ambient temps.
Riddle me this - if it were heavier than water, why would it float as it does instead of sinking?
Diesel weighs a bit less than water - approx 7lBs per US gallon, 8.4lBs per imperial gallon or 0.84 Kgs/litre. Land Rover 90 tank is 55 litres so 46Kgs.
Exact calcs for diesel depend on the specific gravity - which changes through the year, typically, because of differing requirements for fuels in summer and winter ambient temps.
Riddle me this - if it were heavier than water, why would it float as it does instead of sinking?
slob
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 22,488
- Location
- Harrogate or London
a us gallon of jet fuel(parafin) is 6lbs.
6x1.2x12/2.2 =abart 39ish
so yer tanks gonna have abart 39kgs of fuel in, it hardly gonna load the spring up is it
6x1.2x12/2.2 =abart 39ish
so yer tanks gonna have abart 39kgs of fuel in, it hardly gonna load the spring up is it
GRUNT
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 8,911
- Location
- On the lake Geneva shoreline.
It dunt reeeeely matter how heavy deeeezil is as far as his leaning landies concerned. Cos the tanks on the higher side. Your not running it on hydrogen are you?
GRUNT
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 8,911
- Location
- On the lake Geneva shoreline.
Unless his tanks bone dry of course.
slob
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 22,488
- Location
- Harrogate or London
nah me laddos, the fuel thing came abart cause someone sed his landy wur higher at the back fer towing and fuel reasons. wint fook all to do wiff tiltin.. whatevva gave you that idea..
GRUNT
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 8,911
- Location
- On the lake Geneva shoreline.
So whats heaviest then 100kg of diezool or 100kg of hydrogen.
GRUNT
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 8,911
- Location
- On the lake Geneva shoreline.
Dunno reeely I'm just trying to tek the ****.
slob
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 22,488
- Location
- Harrogate or London
depends if its a hot day or not
Bradj999
New Member
- Posts
- 353
- Location
- Portishead,Bristol
After market springs arn't sided
GRUNT
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 8,911
- Location
- On the lake Geneva shoreline.
At what temperature?
slob
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 22,488
- Location
- Harrogate or London
Adz
New Member
- Posts
- 3,025
Oh yes you can, you just can't compress liquid denzil.
slob
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 22,488
- Location
- Harrogate or London
by george i think i have it..
The flame temperature can also be predicted from the First Law of Thermodynamics given by
En[h°+Dh] = En[h°+Dh] +Q
r i f i p i f i l
where ni is moles of species i per mole of fuel,
hf°; the enthalpy of formation at standard temperature,
h = h(T) - h(T° = C p(T - T°,
T° is standard temperature,
R and P are reactant and product.
Ql represents the heat loss per mole of fuel consumed.
In this experiment the flame is established on a flat flame burner as shown in Figure 2. The burner is water cooled and the heat loss from the flame to the burner can be measured by measuring the difference in enthalpy between the inlet and outlet cooling water.
q = mCw(To - Ti)
where q is the heat loss per unit time, m is the mass flow rate, Cw the specific heat of the cooling fluid (water) and T o and Ti are the outlet and inlet temperatures, respectively.
The flame temperature can also be predicted from the First Law of Thermodynamics given by
En[h°+Dh] = En[h°+Dh] +Q
r i f i p i f i l
where ni is moles of species i per mole of fuel,
hf°; the enthalpy of formation at standard temperature,
h = h(T) - h(T°
= C p(T - T°, T° is standard temperature,
R and P are reactant and product.
Ql represents the heat loss per mole of fuel consumed.
In this experiment the flame is established on a flat flame burner as shown in Figure 2. The burner is water cooled and the heat loss from the flame to the burner can be measured by measuring the difference in enthalpy between the inlet and outlet cooling water.
q = mCw(To - Ti)
where q is the heat loss per unit time, m is the mass flow rate, Cw the specific heat of the cooling fluid (water) and T o and Ti are the outlet and inlet temperatures, respectively.
