On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:02:50 -0000, "Nige"
<
[email protected]> wrote:
>> I mean, what's the point of getting permission to use stuph, making it
>> available for personal use, then seeing it appear on someone elses
>> site...
>
>That is annoying Martyn, it's like - why bother taking the few spare moments we have during a day to ask
>permission & then some ****er nabs it. For all they know it could have all mannner of legal implications
>to them & others too.
No, all my stuph is cleared for dissemination - even by those who
download it, provided it is for personal use (even the Crown Copyright
stuff). I just hate it when people don't credit where they got it
from or worse, delete the 'for non commercial use' type bits bit from
the docs or images where it exists. The reason I make stuph publicly
available is _so_ it can be downloaded and passed around, and enjoyed.
>I'm down your way this week, fancy a brew, dont forget you owe me a sit in the purple fecker!!!
Always welcome, give me a call first to make sure I'm here or not
snowed under, though. Tough month is January!
--
"We have gone from a world of concentrated knowledge and wisdom to one
of distributed ignorance. And we know and understand less while being
increasingly capable." Prof. Peter Cochrane, formerly of BT Labs
In memory of Brian {Hamilton Kelly} who logged off 15th September 2005