land rover shocks

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
D

dale

Guest
i have been given a pair of shock absorbers for a land rover but any part
numer serch i do dont show what land rover they are for the part number is
ntc 8214 then followed by land rover then 2765 0 2327 07 and finally chb
33053 can any one help identifing these and will they fit a 1987 rr classic


 


dale wrote:

>i have been given a pair of shock absorbers for a land rover but any part
>numer serch i do dont show what land rover they are for the part number is
>ntc 8214 then followed by land rover then 2765 0 2327 07 and finally chb
>33053 can any one help identifing these and will they fit a 1987 rr classic
>
>
>
>
My 1986 to 92 spares book doesn't list NTC8214. The damper kits - shock
absorber plus rubber bushes etc are all RTC . . . or STC . . .

Richard


--
Real email address is RJS at BIGFOOT dot COM

The information contained in this post
may not be published in, or used by

http://www.diyprojects.info
 
thanks that is really strange as they are def land rover shocks i suppose i
will just have to see if they do fit they are far more beefer than my range
rover shocks

"Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> dale wrote:
>
>>i have been given a pair of shock absorbers for a land rover but any part
>>numer serch i do dont show what land rover they are for the part number is
>>ntc 8214 then followed by land rover then 2765 0 2327 07 and finally chb
>>33053 can any one help identifing these and will they fit a 1987 rr
>>classic
>>
>>
> My 1986 to 92 spares book doesn't list NTC8214. The damper kits - shock
> absorber plus rubber bushes etc are all RTC . . . or STC . . .
>
> Richard
>
>
> --
> Real email address is RJS at BIGFOOT dot COM
>
> The information contained in this post
> may not be published in, or used by
>
> http://www.diyprojects.info


 
On or around Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC), "dale"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>i have been given a pair of shock absorbers for a land rover but any part
>numer serch i do dont show what land rover they are for the part number is
>ntc 8214 then followed by land rover then 2765 0 2327 07 and finally chb
>33053 can any one help identifing these and will they fit a 1987 rr classic
>

odd. must be an old number; none of the lists on Paddock's site has that
number either.

 
In message <[email protected]>
Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:

> On or around Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC), "dale"
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >i have been given a pair of shock absorbers for a land rover but any part
> >numer serch i do dont show what land rover they are for the part number is
> >ntc 8214 then followed by land rover then 2765 0 2327 07 and finally chb
> >33053 can any one help identifing these and will they fit a 1987 rr classic
> >
>
> odd. must be an old number; none of the lists on Paddock's site has that
> number either.
>

Part No's on parts are often the ones assigned during design,
and may well change when parts are released for production,
(I spent 3 very boring months at Rolls doing the job - ugh)
but the tooling retains the provisional number.

Paddocks only, as a rule, list current numbers. As our site
fills up (8,000 parts so far) we follow the number supercessions
through, so reference to older parts books should allow tracing
of numbers through to their current version on the site.

Only 40,000 or so parts to go......... type, type type....

Richard (currently adding the entire SPI catalogue....)


--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Helping keep Land Rovers on and off the road to annoy the Lib Dems
 
On or around Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:49:50 +0000 (UTC), beamendsltd
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>In message <[email protected]>
> Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On or around Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC), "dale"
>> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>>
>> >ntc 8214
>>
>> odd. must be an old number; none of the lists on Paddock's site has that
>> number either.
>>
>
>Part No's on parts are often the ones assigned during design,
>and may well change when parts are released for production,
>(I spent 3 very boring months at Rolls doing the job - ugh)
>but the tooling retains the provisional number.
>
>Paddocks only, as a rule, list current numbers. As our site
>fills up (8,000 parts so far) we follow the number supercessions
>through, so reference to older parts books should allow tracing
>of numbers through to their current version on the site.

so have you got an NTC 8214 then? :)

 
yes NTC8214 is the part no on both shocks they appear to have never been
fitted and are a nice bright green colour also the top mounting eye is a lot
more robust than my rr one's having been reinforced
but as i said before they are both stamped with land rover


"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On or around Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:49:50 +0000 (UTC), beamendsltd
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
>>In message <[email protected]>
>> Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On or around Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC), "dale"
>>> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>>>
>>> >ntc 8214
>>>
>>> odd. must be an old number; none of the lists on Paddock's site has
>>> that
>>> number either.
>>>
>>
>>Part No's on parts are often the ones assigned during design,
>>and may well change when parts are released for production,
>>(I spent 3 very boring months at Rolls doing the job - ugh)
>>but the tooling retains the provisional number.
>>
>>Paddocks only, as a rule, list current numbers. As our site
>>fills up (8,000 parts so far) we follow the number supercessions
>>through, so reference to older parts books should allow tracing
>>of numbers through to their current version on the site.
>
> so have you got an NTC 8214 then? :)
>


 
On or around Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:23:04 +0000 (UTC), "dale"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>yes NTC8214 is the part no on both shocks they appear to have never been
>fitted and are a nice bright green colour also the top mounting eye is a lot
>more robust than my rr one's having been reinforced
>but as i said before they are both stamped with land rover
>

my comment was aimed at "beamends Richard", in fact.

Could I ask you to post underneath what you're replying to, which makes it
easier to work out what's going on...

>
>"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...

>>
>> so have you got an NTC 8214 then? :)
>>
>

 
In message <[email protected]>
Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:

> On or around Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:49:50 +0000 (UTC), beamendsltd
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >In message <[email protected]>
> > Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On or around Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC), "dale"
> >> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
> >>
> >> >ntc 8214
> >>
> >> odd. must be an old number; none of the lists on Paddock's site has that
> >> number either.
> >>
> >
> >Part No's on parts are often the ones assigned during design,
> >and may well change when parts are released for production,
> >(I spent 3 very boring months at Rolls doing the job - ugh)
> >but the tooling retains the provisional number.
> >
> >Paddocks only, as a rule, list current numbers. As our site
> >fills up (8,000 parts so far) we follow the number supercessions
> >through, so reference to older parts books should allow tracing
> >of numbers through to their current version on the site.
>
> so have you got an NTC 8214 then? :)
>

Yep! But as thats not a "real" part number I'd need the
application...... ;-)

Richard

--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Helping keep Land Rovers on and off the road to annoy the Lib Dems
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Bstard bolt came loose on oil pump land rover d2 td5
2
Replies
29
Views
3K
Stanleysteamer
Stanleysteamer
Hexonxonx
1970 SIIa Ex mod Marshall Ambulance
2
Replies
32
Views
8K
Hexonxonx
Hexonxonx
A
Newbie Q’s - 1st Ever Series Land Rover
Replies
10
Views
2K
ANK84
A
300bhp/ton
Freelander vs Range Rover off road flex test....
Replies
16
Views
5K
GrumpyGel
GrumpyGel
SG1
Land Rover Defender TD5 110 - No Brake Pedal
Replies
12
Views
3K
lightning
lightning
Back
Top