How reliable are the Disco Auto boxes?

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
M

Matthew Maddock

Guest
200/300 series. My wife will only drive an auto, and we
need something with 7 seats ideally. Thought an auto Tdi
disco 200/300 would be a good option. Anything else with
7 seats and an auto box seem to have major problems with
the auto box variant. Not that I'm just making up excuses
to buy a LR! :)

Is the disco auto box any good? I'm not bothered from a
drive-ability point of view, more if it is going to be
reliable. I don't recall hearing anything specifically
bad about them.

Cheers,

Matt
 
Matthew Maddock wrote:
> 200/300 series. My wife will only drive an auto, and we
> need something with 7 seats ideally. Thought an auto Tdi
> disco 200/300 would be a good option. Anything else with
> 7 seats and an auto box seem to have major problems with
> the auto box variant. Not that I'm just making up excuses
> to buy a LR! :)
>
> Is the disco auto box any good? I'm not bothered from a
> drive-ability point of view, more if it is going to be
> reliable. I don't recall hearing anything specifically
> bad about them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt


I dont think i have heard anything bad about any of the auto boxes fitted to any landies matey!!!

Nige


 
Nige wrote:

|| Matthew Maddock wrote:
||| 200/300 series. My wife will only drive an auto, and we
||| need something with 7 seats ideally. Thought an auto Tdi
||| disco 200/300 would be a good option. Anything else with
||| 7 seats and an auto box seem to have major problems with
||| the auto box variant. Not that I'm just making up excuses
||| to buy a LR! :)
|||
||| Is the disco auto box any good? I'm not bothered from a
||| drive-ability point of view, more if it is going to be
||| reliable. I don't recall hearing anything specifically
||| bad about them.
|||
||| Cheers,
|||
||| Matt
||
|| I dont think i have heard anything bad about any of the auto boxes
|| fitted to any landies matey!!!
||
|| Nige

No, pretty bulletproof IME. Check the transmission oil is a nice pink
colour - cloudy or brown suggests it's been cooked and (according to Badger
who posted on this a while ago) means the box might be on its way out.

Personally, I don't think the Tdi has enough power to cope with the extra
transmission losses of an auto and still provide a good drive - my 300Tdi
struggled with towing, even with a bigger intercooler and chip. YMMV.

--
Rich
==============================

I don't approve of signatures, so I don't have one.


 
Richard Brookman wrote:

> Personally, I don't think the Tdi has enough power to cope with the extra
> transmission losses of an auto and still provide a good drive - my 300Tdi
> struggled with towing, even with a bigger intercooler and chip. YMMV.


I don't think you can lay that deficiency at the door of the
transmission. The Tdi just lacks horses.

I gave up a third of my horsespower moving from a 3.5 V8 to a 300Tdi
on an RRC and it shows. Effectively the same auto on both.

Unlike many autos, Matt, you can drive these like a clutchless manual.
Do as much or as little work as suits you.

 
Dougal wrote:

|| Richard Brookman wrote:
||
||| Personally, I don't think the Tdi has enough power to cope with the
||| extra transmission losses of an auto and still provide a good drive
||| - my 300Tdi struggled with towing, even with a bigger intercooler
||| and chip. YMMV.
||
|| I don't think you can lay that deficiency at the door of the
|| transmission. The Tdi just lacks horses.

I think that's what I said.

|| I gave up a third of my horsespower moving from a 3.5 V8 to a 300Tdi
|| on an RRC and it shows. Effectively the same auto on both.

I moved from 225 in the RR4.6 to 111 in the Tdi. BIG difference.

--
Rich
==============================

I don't approve of signatures, so I don't have one.


 
Richard Brookman wrote:

> || I don't think you can lay that deficiency at the door of the
> || transmission. The Tdi just lacks horses.
>
> I think that's what I said.


You did! but ...

I don't think it's the power losses in the auto compared with the
manual that are the issue - isn't that where you're laying the blame?

111/115 HP or whatever is just not enough to propel two tons plus
caravan uphill at the sort of speeds we were used to. By the sound of
it you've already compensated for the autobox losses with intercooler
and chipping and are still way short of what you would like.

The fuel does go further but the 'fun' just isn't there, is it?
 
Di it Matt!

Nothing beats an auto off road and you'll develop an aggressive right
foot to compensate when pulling out of junctions.


Dougal wrote:
> Richard Brookman wrote:
>
> > || I don't think you can lay that deficiency at the door of the
> > || transmission. The Tdi just lacks horses.
> >
> > I think that's what I said.

>
> You did! but ...
>
> I don't think it's the power losses in the auto compared with the
> manual that are the issue - isn't that where you're laying the blame?
>
> 111/115 HP or whatever is just not enough to propel two tons plus
> caravan uphill at the sort of speeds we were used to. By the sound of
> it you've already compensated for the autobox losses with intercooler
> and chipping and are still way short of what you would like.
>
> The fuel does go further but the 'fun' just isn't there, is it?


 
> No, pretty bulletproof IME. Check the transmission oil is a nice pink
> colour - cloudy or brown suggests it's been cooked and (according to Badger
> who posted on this a while ago) means the box might be on its way out.


OK, will bear that in mind. All sounding good so far - just hope I can
persuade SWMBO that she *can* drive something that big! Seems like a
good option - can't really afford to run 3 vehicles. A Tdi Disco would
take out the need for 2 of those, and in many cases would be a suitable
substitute for the van.

> Personally, I don't think the Tdi has enough power to cope with the extra
> transmission losses of an auto and still provide a good drive - my 300Tdi
> struggled with towing, even with a bigger intercooler and chip. YMMV.


I'm not really bothered about flying around the place, so slow doesn't
bother me. It probably won't be doing that much mileage anyway, just
to the local supermarket and the odd trip to the airport down the
motorway. Even so - I don't want to run a V8 (much as I'd like to!)
I've run several in the past and I know exactly how thirsty they are!
its got to be diesel. I'd really like to get another P38 diesel,
but my budget just won't go that far right now :-(

Cheers for the replies. Will start looking out for one and subtly
e-mailing them to SWMBO until she relents!

Matt



 
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:57:46 +0100, Matthew Maddock
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
> OK, will bear that in mind. All sounding good so far - just hope I can
> persuade SWMBO that she *can* drive something that big!


Girlie reactions can be odd.

Sounds as though our reasons for getting a Discovery were much the same as
yours. SWMBO is ok driving but is beginning to feel a little self
concious in such a large vehicle. I may have to line the glass with that
stuff that drug dealers and minor celebs use. OTOH perhaps it's just a
case of getting used to it.

Looking at it on the drive I'd say the Discovery is about 18" (maybe 2')
shorter than the 110. I think only a life threatening event would prsuade
SWMBO to drive the 110.

> ...
> Will start looking out for one and subtly
> e-mailing them to SWMBO until she relents!


Most folk selling diesels seem to have an over inflated idea of the price
(too fussy for me - I wouldn't give them space on the drive) - however,
when you find the right one and feel you can keep it for a while, the odd
£100 shouldn't become an obstacle. The purchase price of 2nd hand
vehicles is generally a tiny part of the TCO.

--
William Tasso

Land Rover - 110 V8
Discovery - V8
 
In message <[email protected]>
Matthew Maddock <[email protected]> wrote:

> 200/300 series. My wife will only drive an auto, and we
> need something with 7 seats ideally. Thought an auto Tdi
> disco 200/300 would be a good option. Anything else with
> 7 seats and an auto box seem to have major problems with
> the auto box variant. Not that I'm just making up excuses
> to buy a LR! :)
>
> Is the disco auto box any good? I'm not bothered from a
> drive-ability point of view, more if it is going to be
> reliable. I don't recall hearing anything specifically
> bad about them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt


Very reliable, just keep the oil changed regularly.

Richard

--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
RISC-OS - Where have all the good guys gone?
Lib Dems - Townies keeping comedy alive
 
Dougal wrote:

|| Richard Brookman wrote:
||
||||| I don't think you can lay that deficiency at the door of the
||||| transmission. The Tdi just lacks horses.
|||
||| I think that's what I said.
||
|| You did! but ...
||
|| I don't think it's the power losses in the auto compared with the
|| manual that are the issue - isn't that where you're laying the blame?
||
|| 111/115 HP or whatever is just not enough to propel two tons plus
|| caravan uphill at the sort of speeds we were used to. By the sound of
|| it you've already compensated for the autobox losses with intercooler
|| and chipping and are still way short of what you would like.
||
|| The fuel does go further but the 'fun' just isn't there, is it?

I see what you mean now. Yes, the Tdi lacks the horses, but I've spoken to
many people who swear by the Tdi (manual) for towing. I've never had one,
so I can't compare, but manual = great tug, auto = struggling suggests that
the autobox may be the deciding factor.

--
Rich
==============================

I don't approve of signatures, so I don't have one.


 
Matthew Maddock wrote:

|| I'm not really bothered about flying around the place, so slow
|| doesn't bother me.

It's not just slow that's the problem - as Chavscum says, a heavy right foot
will compensate for that. It's the way that with any kind of load or hill,
you will not get it into top gear below about 55mph. I got tired of the
noise and general frazzle of going almost everywhere in 3rd. Once on the
motorway and up to speed, it was fine - until the road went uphill. :).

--
Rich
==============================

I don't approve of signatures, so I don't have one.


 

"Richard Brookman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Matthew Maddock wrote:
>
> || I'm not really bothered about flying around the place, so slow
> || doesn't bother me.
>
> It's not just slow that's the problem - as Chavscum says, a heavy right
> foot will compensate for that. It's the way that with any kind of load or
> hill, you will not get it into top gear below about 55mph. I got tired of
> the noise and general frazzle of going almost everywhere in 3rd. Once on
> the motorway and up to speed, it was fine - until the road went uphill.
> :).
>

It may feel that the Disco is changing from 3rd to 4th at 55mph, but in most
situations it is the torque converter locking up, or going 'solid'.
The Disco is often in 4th at much lower speeds, and the torque coverter is
set to slip at varying speeds depending on the year model, relating to the
Tdi 200 or Tdi300 bhp ratings, and torque outputs.
It appears that the settings ranged from 48mph to 55mph from early to late
years.
I've had four diesel Discos and the settings got higher with the latest
models.
The torque converter noise and the effect of slipping was a pain to me, and
I complained many times to Land Rover, but got no satisfaction, so in the
end I changed to Manual Box, it's a lot quieter.
None of the Autos have been faulty, always reliable, --- but that torque
converter was awful.
Gordon


 
Gordoni wrote:

|| It may feel that the Disco is changing from 3rd to 4th at 55mph, but
|| in most situations it is the torque converter locking up, or going
|| 'solid'.

Typical scenario: pulling a caravan (1.3t) on a level road. Up to 50mph,
third gear. ~50mph, revs drop as it goes into 4th. ~55mph, revs drop again
as TC locks up.

--
Rich
==============================

I don't approve of signatures, so I don't have one.


 
As others have said, the power of the 300Tdi is not going to win any
races. personally I find that it is the gear ratios of the auto that
cause most of the problems.

I find that when the raod starts pointing up, you either labour up in
lockup top at 89-100km/h but you need to wait till about 80km/h before
selecting 3rd or the engine will just sound unpleasant.

As said towing just makes things a lot worse.

i am gnerally very happy with my wagon (96 Disco 300Tdi auto) but when
I replace it I will definitely look at a manual as I think the ratios
are better selected but I will miss the easy driving of the auto.

Regards
Stephen
 

"Matthew Maddock" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:D[email protected]...
>
> Is the disco auto box any good? I'm not bothered from a
> drive-ability point of view, more if it is going to be
> reliable. I don't recall hearing anything specifically
> bad about them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt


Basically, it's a good reliable box. However, it has one main common failing
that is easy to check and easy to prevent, that of premature "A" clutch
wear, and the odd other faults that are also easy to check for.

There are piston-ring type total-seal rings that in theory seal oil passages
within the rotating input shaft and static stator shaft at the front of the
box. As these seals wear, they allow a bleed of oil from the outlet of the
main pump to partially apply the main "A" clutch in the box. This clutch is
permanently applied in all forward gears but released in P, R and N. If it
is applied in P, R or N, the clutch slips, causing wear. This situation can
be caused by excessively (continuously and regularly) revving the engine in
P or N, or sitting the engine at, say, 3000rpm in the case of setting up LPG
on a V8. The "cure" (preventive measure) is to put the transfer box in N and
main box in D, 3, 2 or 1 if you need to sit revving the engine for any
length of time, as this ensures the "A" clutch is applied and not slipping.

The method of checking for the seal wear (carefully), is to drive the
vehicle for at least 20minutes to ensure the oil has thinned out as it
reaches operating temp; then put the box in N, rev to 2400 (ish) rpm and see
if it creeps forward with the brakes off. Please make sure you have LOTS of
clear space in front when you do this, to be safe! No need to hold the revs
up, just accelerate the engine slowly and if you get to 2400ish with no
creeping, back to idle.

Dip the oil, it ought to be clear, translucent red - if it's brown or dirty
this indicates clutch pack wear, walk away!

If the shift from 1 to 2 (D selected) is overly fierce or delayed to quite a
highish rpm, this is an indication of governor sticking issues; quite common
really, a lot of people just don't realise that it isn't meant to be that
fierce a shift!

There is another issue whereby you select D and it doesn't drive, but you
can select 1 and pull away then go manually through the box right up to D
with no problems. This is a sprag (one-way) roller bearing clutch right in
the centre of the box that has "failed". The rollers have "flipped over"
internally and the box needs removing and stripping to fix. This can be
caused by selecting a forward gear at too high an rpm, or over-zealous
acceleration from a standing start with a powerful engine. (won't apply to
TDi's then!!)

Rpm rises with a "squealing" noise before the vehicle drives - normally low
oil level or a very dirty internal filter. Ask yourself why the filter is
dirty though, where is the dirt or debris coming from, the clutch packs
wearing??

Don't let this put you off an autobox though, they are essentially very
reliable bits of kit that will go for easily well over 130,000miles given
the correct routine maintenance. I know of some with nearly 200,000 miles
that have had no issues. The failures quoted here are the typical failure
modes with the box, the overall failure rate is very low when used in the
way the manufacturer designed it. We run a zf box from a range rover classic
in one of our racers, it is abused severely (banged into gear at rpm's well
above idle, held against the brakes with throttle applied etc etc) and it
has survived 3 or 4 seasons of Hillrally and Comp Safari use since fitting,
although the oil is starting to show clutch wear debris now. It was lifted
from a motor with 80-odd thou on the clock, and apart from a mod to the
valve body to prevent the convertor clutch locking in 4th, it was thrown
into the racer with no other work being done to it!

Be warned though, in my opinion a tdi with an autobox is rather lethargic,
especially when towing. :)

Badger.


 
> Basically, it's a good reliable box. However, it has one main common failing
> that is easy to check and easy to prevent, that of premature "A" clutch
> wear, and the odd other faults that are also easy to check for.


snip

> Be warned though, in my opinion a tdi with an autobox is rather lethargic,
> especially when towing. :)


Cheers for that Badger, top tips. Will definitely bear them in mind.

Sadly I don't have the manual option as SWMBO will *only* drive an auto
no questions, no haggling, if it's not an idiot box she won't drive it!
Not that I have anything against auto's per se, I actually find driving
her auto beemer around town very easy and relaxing (tho it does have a
nice juicy straight-six under the bonnet!). But - I don't want
to run two cars (plus a van) after we move, and I want a LR
(naturally!) so thought the best option given limited budget was an
older Disco. Would like a 110, but you just don't get them in auto's
unless someone has stuck a RR V8 or similar engine into one, and then
you are talking ££££ - plus I don't think I could persuade her to drive
a 110 whatever! Yes, I know they are only a fraction bigger than a
Disco, but try telling a woman that - those extra couple of inches make
all the difference - so she tells me! :-D

Matt
 
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 07:53:42 +0100, beamendsltd
<[email protected]> wrote:

>In message <[email protected]>
> Matthew Maddock <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 200/300 series. My wife will only drive an auto, and we
>> need something with 7 seats ideally. Thought an auto Tdi
>> disco 200/300 would be a good option. Anything else with
>> 7 seats and an auto box seem to have major problems with
>> the auto box variant. Not that I'm just making up excuses
>> to buy a LR! :)
>>
>> Is the disco auto box any good? I'm not bothered from a
>> drive-ability point of view, more if it is going to be
>> reliable. I don't recall hearing anything specifically
>> bad about them.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matt

>
>Very reliable, just keep the oil changed regularly.
>
>Richard



Good tip about changing the oil - just how do you get it all out?
 

<rookthorn> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 07:53:42 +0100, beamendsltd
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In message <[email protected]>
> > Matthew Maddock <[email protected]>

wrote:
> >
> >> 200/300 series. My wife will only drive an auto, and we
> >> need something with 7 seats ideally. Thought an auto Tdi
> >> disco 200/300 would be a good option. Anything else with
> >> 7 seats and an auto box seem to have major problems with
> >> the auto box variant. Not that I'm just making up excuses
> >> to buy a LR! :)
> >>
> >> Is the disco auto box any good? I'm not bothered from a
> >> drive-ability point of view, more if it is going to be
> >> reliable. I don't recall hearing anything specifically
> >> bad about them.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Matt

> >
> >Very reliable, just keep the oil changed regularly.
> >
> >Richard

>
>
> Good tip about changing the oil - just how do you get it all out?


You don't, well, not without specialist flushing equipment anyway. Just
drain what you can (about half the contents) regularly and it'll be fine.
(Regularly, as in landrover's recommended change interval)
Badger.


 
On or around Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:08:03 +0100, "Richard Brookman"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>Dougal wrote:
>
>|| Richard Brookman wrote:
>||
>||| Personally, I don't think the Tdi has enough power to cope with the
>||| extra transmission losses of an auto and still provide a good drive
>||| - my 300Tdi struggled with towing, even with a bigger intercooler
>||| and chip. YMMV.
>||
>|| I don't think you can lay that deficiency at the door of the
>|| transmission. The Tdi just lacks horses.
>
>I think that's what I said.
>
>|| I gave up a third of my horsespower moving from a 3.5 V8 to a 300Tdi
>|| on an RRC and it shows. Effectively the same auto on both.
>
>I moved from 225 in the RR4.6 to 111 in the Tdi. BIG difference.


to be fair, though, you'd have the same problem with a big van and a manual
TDi - they aren't that fast towing a big trailer, especially on any
significant hill.

mind, they make a 2¼ diesel look like a racehorse on steroids. How often
did you have to use low box? Towing with a 110 2.5 petrol I had to use low
box on a few occasions...
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"'Tis a mad world, my masters" John Taylor (1580-1633) Western Voyage, 1
 
Back
Top