Does off roading avoid transmission probs?

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Emeye

New Member
Posts
69
Location
Manchester, UK
Is it true that freelanders that have been driven off-road are less likely to have the VCU/IRD issues?

I read this in a Landrover mag the other day - had a search but could not find anything on here about it.

Cheers.
 
Someone else mentioned that article quite a while ago.... along the lines of 'either use it or lose it'.

Im no expert but I would tend to agree with them although not necessarily off roading that is needed.... been spirited around roundabouts and making the VCU apply drive to the rear wheels will also mean the VCU is been used.

Steve
 
I'm not convinced. I don't see how working the transmission harder can do anything other than increase wear and tear. :)
 
the point is to try and get slippage between the axles so the gel in the vcu has to stiffen and therefore apply a modicom of power to the rear wheels, if the vehicle just does mainly straight line tarmac work the suggestion is the vcu is more likely to seize up than one which gets driven over mixed surfaces, and damage to the drivetrain from a seized vcu is well documented. we should be aware that the ratio change of the final drives in 2001 models goes a long way towards lessening vcu problems, but they do still fail.
 
Mmmmm
First Freelander (Xedi manual) did 90K+ in just over 2 years, off road at pay and play sites at least every month, but still a lot of motorway miles. Used to eat tyres (<25K), got rid at that stage as the IRD and diff were louder that the radio. Also had 3 sets of prop shaft bearings.
Second (2006 auto)was taken down a quarry most days, off road every 2-3months at pay and play sites, diff seals went but other than that the transmission was fine after 2 years and 60k+ miles.

My opinion for what it's worth.
The early ones had a different gear ratio front to back compared to the facelift version, this failed on many and gave the FL1 it's bad reputation for eating transmissions. The later ones aren't perfect (other wise it would be on the FL2), just better.
Not many are going to bother to type in here that there is nothing wrong with thier cars, but if you need help it's the right place to come, so you will here a lot about people who need help with various broken bits including transmissions.
 
Mmmmm
First Freelander (Xedi manual) did 90K+ in just over 2 years, off road at pay and play sites at least every month, but still a lot of motorway miles. Used to eat tyres (<25K), got rid at that stage as the IRD and diff were louder that the radio. Also had 3 sets of prop shaft bearings.
Second (2006 auto)was taken down a quarry most days, off road every 2-3months at pay and play sites, diff seals went but other than that the transmission was fine after 2 years and 60k+ miles.

My opinion for what it's worth.
The early ones had a different gear ratio front to back compared to the facelift version, this failed on many and gave the FL1 it's bad reputation for eating transmissions. The later ones aren't perfect (other wise it would be on the FL2), just better.
Not many are going to bother to type in here that there is nothing wrong with thier cars, but if you need help it's the right place to come, so you will here a lot about people who need help with various broken bits including transmissions.

Agree with you, I think the FL2 was born out of a difference philosophy of car design/engineering than the FL1 though - queue the jokes...

On an aside i have just gone over 138K in my FL1 with no trouble, i going to regret saying that aren't I? i can hear the coupling contemplating failure now!
 
Back
Top