Another victim of early release

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
D

Dave P

Guest
Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
stealing his Land Rover last year? Turns out the killer was released
after serving only half of his sentence for burgling from farms.

Why doesn't 3½ years in prison mean 3½ years in prison? In reality,
every sentence is half as long as the judge hands down, unless you are
really naughty when you are in there, it seems. Ten years for murder,
walk free in five. Can anyone with the appropriate knowledge explain
why this is so?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1969888,00.html

DaveP

 
In message <[email protected]>
"Dave P" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
> stealing his Land Rover last year? Turns out the killer was released
> after serving only half of his sentence for burgling from farms.
>
> Why doesn't 3½ years in prison mean 3½ years in prison? In reality,
> every sentence is half as long as the judge hands down, unless you are
> really naughty when you are in there, it seems. Ten years for murder,
> walk free in five. Can anyone with the appropriate knowledge explain
> why this is so?
>
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1969888,00.html
>
> DaveP
>


It's probably for two reasons - to encourage the offender to re-habilitate
and to make people behave in prison. In theory.

Being a cynic, I'd suggest that the legal profession can get more
money out of the system by spending more time in court while sentancing
is decided ;-)

Richard

--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Boycott the Yorkshire Dales - No Play, No Pay
 
Dave P <[email protected]> wrote:

> Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
> stealing his Land Rover last year? ...


The point may be valid and even vaguely on-topic, but racism (hopefully
unintended) obscures the message.

--
William Tasso

110 V8 (white)
 


William Tasso wrote:
>
> Dave P <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
> > stealing his Land Rover last year? ...

>
> The point may be valid and even vaguely on-topic, but racism (hopefully
> unintended) obscures the message.
>
> --
> William Tasso
>
> 110 V8 (white) <<<<<<<<<< Yes it does ;-)


Being serious, what is a gyppo. Can't find it in the dictionary.
Kind regards,
Erik-Jan.
 
William Tasso wrote:
> Dave P <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
>> stealing his Land Rover last year? ...

>
>
> The point may be valid and even vaguely on-topic, but racism (hopefully
> unintended) obscures the message.
>


Not sure of his actual ethnic roots, but I wasn't desperately surprised
to see that the thief hails from New Parks - an estate in Leicester
specialising in training jail scum.

--
jermec (ex local prison officer)

You, in the red uniform, go see what that noise is!
 
William Tasso wrote:
> Dave P <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
>> stealing his Land Rover last year? ...

>
> The point may be valid and even vaguely on-topic, but racism (hopefully
> unintended) obscures the message.
>

If he'd said "Romany" then it might be racist. As it is, "Gyppo" covers
all other UK vagrants quite nicely.

Steve
 
> Being serious, what is a gyppo. Can't find it in the dictionary.
> Kind regards,
> Erik-Jan.


Gyppo :- Take it if it's not yours and pay for nothing..
or
Gypoo:- Cr*p in public areas but don't wipe thier arses...
or
Gypee:- The relief when they have buggerd off to another town...

Adrian Ford


 

"Erik-Jan Geniets" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> William Tasso wrote:
>>
>> Dave P <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
>> > stealing his Land Rover last year? ...

>>
>> The point may be valid and even vaguely on-topic, but racism (hopefully
>> unintended) obscures the message.
>>
>> --
>> William Tasso
>>
>> 110 V8 (white) <<<<<<<<<< Yes it does ;-)

>
> Being serious, what is a gyppo. Can't find it in the dictionary.
> Kind regards,
> Erik-Jan.


I assumed gypoo = gypsy = gipsy (latter is in dictionary)

Richard


 
Sorry William. I had no intention to offend or insult our genuine
Romany friends, who I am sure are all fine upstanding people who live
in brightly-coloured horse-drawn caravans and make a decent living out
of fortune-telling and selling scraps of heather. However, I am very
happy to insult and offend those (of any race or nationality) who
travel the country leaving unspeakable messes for the "settled
community" to clear up, disturb the communities that they leech on with
theft, burglary and intimidation, pay no taxes or contribute to society
in any way, but expect all the benefits society provides, like
schooling, healthcare and street lighting, pick and choose the laws
they obey (anti-discrimination - yes, planning and motoring law - no),
and have armies of sandal-wearing lentil-munching do-gooders to
represent their interests whenever they perceive any discrimination
against them. Where I come from, they are called "gyppos", I suppose
because of the wholly undeserved reputation of some Gypsies for being
light-fingered, dishonest rogues. Otherwise "travellers", "pikeys"
etc. I meant these gyppos, not Gypsies. I used the term inaccurately
as a general-purpose insult, for which I apologise. In fact, it seems
that the two offenders in this case were merely "chavs". Are we
allowed to say that?

And it was bang on-topic because the guy died trying to stop someone
stealing his Land Rover. As in alt.fan.landrover.

 


Dave P wrote:

> Sorry William. I had no intention to offend or insult our genuine
> Romany friends, who I am sure are all fine upstanding people who live
> in brightly-coloured horse-drawn caravans and make a decent living out
> of fortune-telling and selling scraps of heather. However, I am very
> happy to insult and offend those (of any race or nationality) who
> travel the country leaving unspeakable messes for the "settled
> community" to clear up, disturb the communities that they leech on with
> theft, burglary and intimidation, pay no taxes or contribute to society
> in any way, but expect all the benefits society provides, like
> schooling, healthcare and street lighting, pick and choose the laws
> they obey (anti-discrimination - yes, planning and motoring law - no),
> and have armies of sandal-wearing lentil-munching do-gooders to
> represent their interests whenever they perceive any discrimination
> against them. Where I come from, they are called "gyppos", I suppose
> because of the wholly undeserved reputation of some Gypsies for being
> light-fingered, dishonest rogues. Otherwise "travellers", "pikeys"
> etc. I meant these gyppos, not Gypsies. I used the term inaccurately
> as a general-purpose insult, for which I apologise. In fact, it seems
> that the two offenders in this case were merely "chavs". Are we
> allowed to say that?
>
> And it was bang on-topic because the guy died trying to stop someone
> stealing his Land Rover. As in alt.fan.landrover.
>

The Gypsy communities are not the problem. They get most of the blame
and link by the Irish Tinkers or Travellers. As with the law or justice.
The judge works with a tariff that is set by Law lords and by Government.
The same people new labour.
--
-
Compliments

John N Oakes
Manchester, England.

=============================
! Nightshift Morlock Worker!
! Landrover 110 V8 1988 !
! Atari/Win/Mac User !
=============================
 

"John Oakes" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Dave P wrote:
>
> > Sorry William. I had no intention to offend or insult our genuine
> > Romany friends, who I am sure are all fine upstanding people who live
> > in brightly-coloured horse-drawn caravans and make a decent living out
> > of fortune-telling and selling scraps of heather. However, I am very
> > happy to insult and offend those (of any race or nationality) who
> > travel the country leaving unspeakable messes for the "settled
> > community" to clear up, disturb the communities that they leech on with
> > theft, burglary and intimidation, pay no taxes or contribute to society
> > in any way, but expect all the benefits society provides, like
> > schooling, healthcare and street lighting, pick and choose the laws
> > they obey (anti-discrimination - yes, planning and motoring law - no),
> > and have armies of sandal-wearing lentil-munching do-gooders to
> > represent their interests whenever they perceive any discrimination
> > against them. Where I come from, they are called "gyppos", I suppose
> > because of the wholly undeserved reputation of some Gypsies for being
> > light-fingered, dishonest rogues. Otherwise "travellers", "pikeys"
> > etc. I meant these gyppos, not Gypsies. I used the term inaccurately
> > as a general-purpose insult, for which I apologise. In fact, it seems
> > that the two offenders in this case were merely "chavs". Are we
> > allowed to say that?
> >
> > And it was bang on-topic because the guy died trying to stop someone
> > stealing his Land Rover. As in alt.fan.landrover.
> >

> The Gypsy communities are not the problem. They get most of the blame
> and link by the Irish Tinkers or Travellers. As with the law or justice.
> The judge works with a tariff that is set by Law lords and by Government.
> The same people new labour.
> --
> -
> Compliments


Dave P
No need to aplogise to anyone we all know what you meant and we all know
that their is good and bad in all types of people..
Just before xmas our town centre car park was invaded by gyps,tinks,tiefs or
whatever you want to call em in caravans,transits and settees(Sofas if your
posh).Now if i wanted to park their it would cost me 50p an hour and their
are packs of wardens waiting for your ticket to run out to give you a
fine...The gyps had about 50 caravans,50 transit vans and 50 parking spaces
of rubbish for about 5 days and did they get one ticket did they
bollocks.When local council was questioned on this they replied "they were
not issued with a ticket because they would not pay the fine".
And as my council tax helped pay for clearing the rubbish,Crap, burnt outs
and so on i have the right to call them what i want...

Now if I was a Gypo I could greenlane anywhere I wanted ,dump my rubbish on
the lane, crap on the pathway for kids to tread in, burn out a few
settees,pinch from the local shops and park my caravan on the lane for free
and the local council wouldn't do a thing.

As a council tax , Car tax,insurance,mot,and petrol payer i would get fined
to the hilt, licence removed,and community service cleaning up gypo
crap..And be in all the papers as a 4x4 hooligan ruining the countryside..

Mmmmmm! I'm gonna have to get a caravan and a transit.

Anybody want their driveway tarmacking? Just sent the kids down to tesco to
pinch the tea.(Dinner if your posh)

Adrian Ford




 
beamendsltd wrote:
> In message <[email protected]>
> "Dave P" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
>>stealing his Land Rover last year? Turns out the killer was released
>>after serving only half of his sentence for burgling from farms.
>>
>>Why doesn't 3½ years in prison mean 3½ years in prison? In reality,
>>every sentence is half as long as the judge hands down, unless you are
>>really naughty when you are in there, it seems. Ten years for murder,
>>walk free in five. Can anyone with the appropriate knowledge explain
>>why this is so?
>>
>>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1969888,00.html
>>
>>DaveP
>>

>
>
> It's probably for two reasons - to encourage the offender to re-habilitate
> and to make people behave in prison. In theory.
>
> Being a cynic, I'd suggest that the legal profession can get more
> money out of the system by spending more time in court while sentancing
> is decided ;-)
>
> Richard


Or remaining in cynical mode, they can have a second (or third etc.)
pick at the cherry when reoffending occurs.
 
Dave P wrote:
> Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
> stealing his Land Rover last year? Turns out the killer was released
> after serving only half of his sentence for burgling from farms.
>
> Why doesn't 3½ years in prison mean 3½ years in prison? In reality,
> every sentence is half as long as the judge hands down, unless you are
> really naughty when you are in there, it seems. Ten years for murder,
> walk free in five. Can anyone with the appropriate knowledge explain
> why this is so?
>
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1969888,00.html
>
> DaveP


Our prisons are overcrowded, so spend millions to build new ones or just let
everyone out early thus freeing space for others to go to prison. Letting
people out early also means it costs less to keep them in prison cos they
are not in as long. If everyone served their full term in prison we would
need twice the number of prisons.

Nigel

--
nigel@leginDOTorg
1979 Lightweight
Blitz 4x4
and a couple of SJs for spares


 
....and beamendsltd spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...


> In message <[email protected]>
> "Dave P" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why doesn't 3½ years in prison mean 3½ years in prison? In reality,
>> every sentence is half as long as the judge hands down, unless you
>> are really naughty when you are in there, it seems. Ten years for
>> murder, walk free in five. Can anyone with the appropriate
>> knowledge explain why this is so?
>>
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1969888,00.html
>>
>> DaveP
>>

>
> It's probably for two reasons - to encourage the offender to
> re-habilitate and to make people behave in prison. In theory.


OK, point taken. But if that's the case, why not be honest about the
sentence? This guy got 42 months in jail for burglary. For doing nothing
but serve his sentence quietly and with good behaviour (I assume), he was
let out after 21 months. Why not say that he was sentenced to 21 months in
the first place, with extra time if he misbehaves while in there?

Cynical answer - because if sentences apparently halved overnight (even
though the actual time served would stay the same) people might think that
the Bliar Govt was going soft on crime.


--
Rich
==============================
Disco 300 Tdi auto
S2a 88" SW
Tiggrr (V8 trialler)


 


Richard wrote:

>
> I assumed gypoo = gypsy = gipsy (latter is in dictionary)
>


Oh, then I do understand the racism thing in an earlier post.
I've met a few recently with a very nice off-roader....
First picture on this page:

http://www.fotograaf.com/geniets/press.htm

Kind regards,
Erik-Jan.
 
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:15:05 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>Richard wrote:
>
>>
>> I assumed gypoo = gypsy = gipsy (latter is in dictionary)
>>

>
>Oh, then I do understand the racism thing in an earlier post.
>I've met a few recently with a very nice off-roader....
>First picture on this page:
>
>http://www.fotograaf.com/geniets/press.htm
>


Is that a Trabant with the back cut off?

Alex
 


Alex wrote:

>
> Is that a Trabant with the back cut off?
>
> Alex


Yes, it is.
Kind regards,
Erik-Jan.
 
On Wednesday, in article
<91e6efe34d%[email protected]>
[email protected] "beamendsltd" wrote:

> In message <[email protected]>
> "Dave P" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
> > stealing his Land Rover last year? Turns out the killer was released
> > after serving only half of his sentence for burgling from farms.
> >
> > Why doesn't 3½ years in prison mean 3½ years in prison? In reality,
> > every sentence is half as long as the judge hands down, unless you are
> > really naughty when you are in there, it seems. Ten years for murder,
> > walk free in five. Can anyone with the appropriate knowledge explain
> > why this is so?
> >
> > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1969888,00.html
> >
> > DaveP
> >

>
> It's probably for two reasons - to encourage the offender to re-habilitate
> and to make people behave in prison. In theory.
>
> Being a cynic, I'd suggest that the legal profession can get more
> money out of the system by spending more time in court while sentancing
> is decided ;-)


A barrister-acquaintance once told me that it's much easier to reduce a
sentence than it is to extend it. There's bad behaviour in prison which
is a crime, but you've have to take them to trial again. So the current
system actually reduces the income for lawyers.

On this sort of thing, it's always worth thinking about whether you'd
trust anyone to handle your case: if you were in prison, would you want
your sentence to be extended without a trial?

As it is, the Judge will know what their sentences really mean, in terms
of time. but they're limited by the legislation in what they can do. So
when the judge says three years, you can hope for less time in prison,
but you can be sure of the maximum.

I think there are problems, but the basic concept seems right.

--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

"I am Number Two," said Penfold. "You are Number Six."
 

"Nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dave P wrote:
>> Remember the farmer who was killed when he tried to stop some gyppo
>> stealing his Land Rover last year? Turns out the killer was released
>> after serving only half of his sentence for burgling from farms.
>>
>> Why doesn't 3½ years in prison mean 3½ years in prison? In reality,
>> every sentence is half as long as the judge hands down, unless you are
>> really naughty when you are in there, it seems. Ten years for murder,
>> walk free in five. Can anyone with the appropriate knowledge explain
>> why this is so?
>>
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1969888,00.html
>>
>> DaveP

>
> Our prisons are overcrowded, so spend millions to build new ones or just
> let everyone out early thus freeing space for others to go to prison.
> Letting people out early also means it costs less to keep them in prison
> cos they are not in as long. If everyone served their full term in prison
> we would need twice the number of prisons.
>
> Nigel


Ok, I've kept out of this thread so far, but I can't hold back any longer!
Rant mode ON!

It should be a right of any decent law-abiding citizen to protect his family
and property, period. If that means knee-capping some pikey (insert other
name of your personal choice, but up here we refer to this sort of scum as
pikeys) ****er when you catch him trying to steal your car/break into your
home etc etc then so be it. If I am ever in that position, I wouldn't
hesitate to defend myself, my family and my property by whatever means I
feel is justified at the time, and argue the self-defense / minimum force
laws afterwards. That farmer that shot that bloke a couple of years back
(tony somebody, was it?) was quite bloody right, the little **** had no
lawful right to be doing what he did and therefore had no right to
protection by the law whilst commiting an unlawful act! The "person" that
killed the farmer whilst nicking his landy was guilty of murder and should
have served a sentence for murder, not a sentence more equivalent to theft!
What we do indeed need Nige, are more prisons and a return to traditional
imprisonment, i.e. a removal of ALL liberty. No tv, no radios, no libraries,
machine shops, woodworking classes etc etc etc coupled with strict
discipline rules and realistic sentences to match the crime commited. Now,
that would act as a decent deterrent to crime, and nothing else ever will.
Send all the bleeding hearts and do-gooders to Iraq or Afghanistan and let
us get on with things in a manner that works for once!
The persons referred to further back in this thread for taking over the car
park and not getting a single fine should have been fined on the spot and
locked up if they don't pay up, just because they happen to be "travelling
people" should NOT exempt them from the laws of the land, the same goes for
a vast majority of all the foreigners descending upon our shores in pursuit
of an easy life.
I personally know a few travelling families, they don't leave burnt out
wrecks and sofas wherever they go, they live clean, legal lifestyles with
good moral values, but they constantly get tarred with the same
"gippo/pikey" brush because of how they choose to lead their lives. Let's
face it, all they are doing is utilising loopholes in the taxation rules so
as not to pay council tax (much the same as someone chosing to drive an old
car so as not to pay road tax!), they are working as self-employed
contractors and being taxed for it the same as most of us are, they simply
choose to live a different lifestyle but are let down by what is probably a
minority of their type.
Mate of mine lost his house in a bad fire some months ago and he is
regularly finding the garage door jemmied open and silly little things
stolen, christ, the buggers have just nicked the cb aerial (18-odd foot
monster of a thing!) off the back wall of the garage!! We've just spent 3
days emptying all the valuable/attractive items (restored car, tools etc)
into secure storage. If we catch them, we'll send the leftovers in assorted
jiffy bags to the local pigs who seem to be incapable of doing anything
useful to help at all!

Rant mode OFF, I feel better now!
Happy new year to all the decent, law abiding people out there ;-)
Badger.


 

"Dave P" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Sorry William. I had no intention to offend or insult our genuine
> Romany friends, who I am sure are all fine upstanding people who live
> in brightly-coloured horse-drawn caravans and make a decent living out
> of fortune-telling and selling scraps of heather. However, I am very
> happy to insult and offend those (of any race or nationality) who
> travel the country leaving unspeakable messes for the "settled
> community" to clear up, disturb the communities that they leech on with
> theft, burglary and intimidation, pay no taxes or contribute to society
> in any way, but expect all the benefits society provides, like
> schooling, healthcare and street lighting, pick and choose the laws
> they obey (anti-discrimination - yes, planning and motoring law - no),
> and have armies of sandal-wearing lentil-munching do-gooders to
> represent their interests whenever they perceive any discrimination
> against them. Where I come from, they are called "gyppos", I suppose
> because of the wholly undeserved reputation of some Gypsies for being
> light-fingered, dishonest rogues. Otherwise "travellers", "pikeys"
> etc. I meant these gyppos, not Gypsies. I used the term inaccurately
> as a general-purpose insult, for which I apologise. In fact, it seems
> that the two offenders in this case were merely "chavs". Are we
> allowed to say that?
>
> And it was bang on-topic because the guy died trying to stop someone
> stealing his Land Rover. As in alt.fan.landrover.
>


dont apologise, the thieving scumbags that purport to be 'gipsies' are
nothing other than trampscum that rape & pillage other folks property
without a **** of thought for the rightful owners etc. We all know what
'gippos' (i believe that's how it should be spelt) are & as far as i'm
concerned they can all **** off to gippo hell.

I have nothing against the Romany Gipsies' as long as they dont nick your
car & **** in your garden!!!!!!!

Nige


 
Back
Top