So Richard Brookman was, like
> So Dom J was, like
>
>> " Looks better than the new Disco, which i have to say is growing
>> on me....slowly!. Still looks like a Transit van from some angles
>> though!. Have seen some of the Range Rover sport prototypes being
>> thrashed round where I live and have to say they go well!.
>
> Does anyone else think it looks a bit like a P38a as modified by Max
> Power - lowered, with lots of shiny extras? I think it looks OK (for
> what it is) - better than the current RR or the new Disco, at least.
Scanning the magazines in a motorway service area yesterday, there was an
edition of a magazine called "4x4 and MPV Driver" (WTF is that?),
half-hidden behind another mag so only the top half was visible. On the
front cover was an orange P38 Rangie, or so I thought. I wondered why they
would put an out-of-production car on the cover and had a closer look. Of
course it was the new RR Sport. Looking closely, the roofline, roof pillars
and bodywork down to the door handles are almost identical to the P38 - even
the clamshell bonnet looks similar, although without the castellations, and
the mirrors look strangely familiar.
I really do think if you took a P38, lowered it, fitted wide(r) wheels and
added a few Halfords shiny styling gizmos, this is what it would look like.
So what's the point of taking an vehicle with great off-road ability,
removing the ground clearance and giving it 150mph performance? It becomes
a 100% road car, never mind the Terrain Response, HDC etc, which I am sure
are only there because buyers will expect to have them. The concept reminds
me of those ghastly drag racers based on a Ford Model T - looks like one
thing, but is another.
Having said all that, I think it looks OK. But it ain't a Land Rover, and I
won't be putting my name down for one, even on a fantasy wish-list.
--
Rich
Pas d'elle yeux Rhone que nous