1975 lwb ex mod Landrover

S

Simon Atkinson

Guest

• Jan 23, 2005

• #21

Richard Brookman wrote:

> So Simon Atkinson was, like
>
> > Richard Brookman wrote:
> >
> >> So [email protected] was, like
> > >
> >>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:16:46 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
> >>> <[email protected]> made me spill my meths when he wrote:
> > > >
> >>>> Join EMLRA, and they will do a search for you for a couple of
> quid. >>>> Membership worth it for that alone.
> > > >
> >>> And 2 hours later he did indeed do that online.Welcome Mark.
> > >
> >> Do I get commission?
> >
> > We'll all call you Captain Rich from now on. Will that do?
>
> Peel me a grape.

Not Richy Rich...

 

W

[email protected]

Guest

• Jan 23, 2005

• #22

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:22:40 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
<[email protected]> made me spill my meths when he wrote:

>>> Do I get commission?
>>
>> You get a big wet kiss.
>
>Woah, come to DADDY!!!!!!!!!! Oh, hang on, name Wayne, mebbe not.

I change the name to Susan at the weekends, is that any help.
--

Wayne Davies, Harrogate 07989 556213

Just another point of view...
www.4x4prejudice.org

 

D

David G. Bell

Guest

• Jan 24, 2005

• #23

On Sunday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "mark" wrote:

> In message <[email protected]>, Mr. Nice.
> <markvarleyphoto@*nospam*softhome.net> writes
> >
> >All FFR's had them (fitted for radio) which yoiurs will be if it is or
> >was 24volt. Also some others such as those for 'ot climate.
> Its definitely 12v now.
> Any clues to tell if it was ever 24v?

If it was converted to 12v electrics, most of the FFR features could
have been removed. But braided screen on the plug leads and a very
different distributor could linger -- the actual spark system was 12v.
But you'd also have a battery box between the front seats, or possibly
two small boxes at the back of the rear wheel arches (I've seen that on
an FFR vehicle fitted with the arctic heater. Also, there are small
pressed-steel covers over holes in the front wing, one each side, where
the RF cables fed through to the aerials.

--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

"I am Number Two," said Penfold. "You are Number Six."

 

R

Richard Brookman

Guest

• Jan 25, 2005

• #24

So [email protected] was, like

> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:22:40 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
> <[email protected]> made me spill my meths when he wrote:
>
>>>> Do I get commission?
>>>
>>> You get a big wet kiss.
>>
>> Woah, come to DADDY!!!!!!!!!! Oh, hang on, name Wayne, mebbe not.
>>
>
> I change the name to Susan at the weekends, is that any help.

I become Samantha, but she's not a lesbian, so we're out of luck. Praps
best stick to Land Rovers.



--

Rich

Pas d'elle yeux Rhone que nous

 

R

Richard Brookman

Guest

• Jan 25, 2005

• #25

So Simon Atkinson was, like

> Richard Brookman wrote:
>
>> So Simon Atkinson was, like
>>
>>> Richard Brookman wrote:
>>>
>>>> So [email protected] was, like
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:16:46 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
>>>>> <[email protected]> made me spill my meths when he wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Join EMLRA, and they will do a search for you for a couple of
>> quid. >>>> Membership worth it for that alone.
>>>>>
>>>>> And 2 hours later he did indeed do that online.Welcome Mark.
>>>>
>>>> Do I get commission?
>>>
>>> We'll all call you Captain Rich from now on. Will that do?
>>
>> Peel me a grape.
>
> Not Richy Rich...

Not since the nasty letter from the bank this morning... (Really.)

--

Rich

Pas d'elle yeux Rhone que nous

 

M

mark

Guest

• Jan 29, 2005

• #26

More questions!

The exhaust pipe on it at the moment has been welded up from all sorts
of bits. I've looked through the catalogues and cant decide what type
should be on it.

It appears that twin tank military types had a different kind of
exhaust. The front pipe looks fine, I am trying to identify the
intermediate pipe and the silencer. Any one know part numbers? Would it
have had 2 silencer 'boxes' ?

TIA
--
Mark Roberts

 

S

Simon Atkinson

Guest

• Jan 29, 2005

• #27

mark wrote:

> More questions!
>
> The exhaust pipe on it at the moment has been welded up from all
> sorts of bits. I've looked through the catalogues and cant decide
> what type should be on it.
>
> It appears that twin tank military types had a different kind of
> exhaust. The front pipe looks fine, I am trying to identify the
> intermediate pipe and the silencer. Any one know part numbers? Would
> it have had 2 silencer 'boxes' ?


I suspect that it would only ever have had one silencer - that was the
norm...

Have you looked here: www.paddockspares.com - they have some pics of
the different systems fitted.

 

D

Dougal

Guest

• Jan 29, 2005

• #28

>>The exhaust pipe on it at the moment has been welded up from all
>>sorts of bits. I've looked through the catalogues and cant decide
>>what type should be on it.
>>
>>It appears that twin tank military types had a different kind of
>>exhaust. The front pipe looks fine, I am trying to identify the
>>intermediate pipe and the silencer. Any one know part numbers? Would
>>it have had 2 silencer 'boxes' ?
>
> I suspect that it would only ever have had one silencer - that was the
> norm...
>
> Have you looked here: www.paddockspares.com - they have some pics of
> the different systems fitted.

Or try Bosal's own site (same pictures on Craddock's site but with LR
part numbers) where you can see several possibilities at the same time:
http://www.catalogue.bosal.com/pages/exh_cartype_search.php

 

B

beamendsltd

Guest

• Jan 29, 2005

• #29

In message <[email protected]>
mark <[email protected]> wrote:

> More questions!
>
> The exhaust pipe on it at the moment has been welded up from all sorts
> of bits. I've looked through the catalogues and cant decide what type
> should be on it.
>
> It appears that twin tank military types had a different kind of
> exhaust. The front pipe looks fine, I am trying to identify the
> intermediate pipe and the silencer. Any one know part numbers? Would it
> have had 2 silencer 'boxes' ?
>
> TIA

most likely

276141 Iintermediate Pipe - 109 to Suff B. £12.92 inc VAT
and
562731 Silencer/Tail Pipe - 88" RHD to November 1976/109"
to Suff B 12.92 inc VAT

Richard
--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Helping keep Land Rovers on and off the road to annoy the Lib Dems

 

M

mark

Guest

• Jan 29, 2005

• #30

In message <4f29e5344d%[email protected]>, beamendsltd
<[email protected]> writes
>In message <[email protected]>
> mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> More questions!
>>
>> The exhaust pipe on it at the moment has been welded up from all sorts
>> of bits. I've looked through the catalogues and cant decide what type
>> should be on it.
>>
>> It appears that twin tank military types had a different kind of
>> exhaust. The front pipe looks fine, I am trying to identify the
>> intermediate pipe and the silencer. Any one know part numbers? Would it
>> have had 2 silencer 'boxes' ?
>>
>> TIA
>
>most likely
>
>276141 Iintermediate Pipe - 109 to Suff B. £12.92 inc VAT
>and
>562731 Silencer/Tail Pipe - 88" RHD to November 1976/109"
> to Suff B 12.92 inc VAT
>
>Richard

Hmmm.
Its difficult to decide because the existing exhaust is not even in the
right place; the silencer for example is suspended along the back cross
member under the back door

After studying the proper mounting points I suspect I need the
following:

Intermediate pipe 503456
silencer/tailpipe 599378

Any opinions?

I was confused as there seemed to be a 'special' (and more expensive)
tailpipe for mod twin tank landrovers; listed in some online catalogues.
There doesn't seem to be anything in the way of the exhaust because of
the twin tanks on mine.

The paddock catalogue is certainly helpful, thanks for the link.

Is there a way of cleaning out rusty petrol tanks, my 'extra' tank
doesn't look very inviting internally...
--
Mark Roberts