Thor1950 said:

No it won't if he had a shorter belt no need for the twist

Click to expand...

vilguy said:

yes it would go backwards if a twist was put in the belt.

Thats what the twist in the belt was used for. Not preventing the the belt from coming off.

The concave surface of the pulley it was centralises it on the pulley

And it works perfectly as is Its just VERY LOUD!!! :hippie:

Click to expand...

Thor1950 said:

no twist right or twist left

Click to expand...

Thor1950 said:

How are you keeping that saw held in place, to keep it from walking

Click to expand...

trax said:

kids sit on it to weigh it down

Click to expand...

Thor1950 said:

No it won't if he had a shorter belt no need for the twist

Click to expand...

vilguy said:

eerrr...

either would reverse direction of the saw

Click to expand...

vilguy said:

sshhhh

dont tell everyone about my patented "dangerous tool hold down technique" ffs

Click to expand...

trax said:

so sowwy, come get gearbox now

Click to expand...

Jam1 said:

I think he means put a left twist followed by a right twist in it and that should keep it running in the right direction

Click to expand...

vilguy said:

im planning on it!

you just want yer military bumper and shiney stainless pots n pans.

bloody magpie

and that flippin table saw i keep tripping up on

Click to expand...

trax said:

haha, yesssssss.

Click to expand...

vilguy said:

was there owt else? ive lost track!

Click to expand...