Whats "Top posting"

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
No, there are no rules.
Unless of course one includes foul language whensomeone doesnt do as they
are told!

"Stephen Hull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In message <[email protected]>
> Of course there are rules, It's just that YOU have no intention of
> following them even after politely being pointed out not to top post.
>
> If you ever require help on this group you'll not get any (not from
> me anyway) due to your blatant lack of respect for newsgroup Netiquette
> and how it's supposed to work.
>
> You'll probably be talking to yourself soon anyway as you'll end up in
> everyones kill file.



 
All new posters,please report to the resident arrogant drunk "mother" for
permission to speak!!!

"Mother" <"@ {m} @"@101fc.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Open and welcoming, but intollerant of arrogant drunks
> coming in and telling us to put fresh sawdust down. >



 
That's a self desription, have you tried medication?
Or more importantly have you considered increasing your dosage?
Regards
S
"Mother" <"@ {m} @"@101fc.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Only reserved for complete ****ers such as yourself who court
> confrontation and live in the happy, moist, incorrect belief that they
> are always right and demonstrate their ability to hold their own,
> albeit in a somewhat jerky manner.
>
>



 
I doubt if you would know what a clue was if it bit you on your posterior!!.

"Mother" <"@ {m} @"@101fc.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> You are evidently unable to read or understand, let me assist you in
> your quest for 'clue'...



 
Your'e one of those "join in johnnies" are you not?
Have to join in to feel like one of the boy's.
Life's lonely for you otherwise isn't it Pete?

"Pete Young" <[email protected].> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I'm still waiting for a top-poster who has anything interesting
> to say - it's like the usenet equivalent of wandering around with
> 'kick me' written on your forehead or dog**** on your shoes.
> Most of them go straight into the killfile.
>
> -- Pete



 
That' cutting and pasting is very naughty.
Are you sure your not Lee's brother?

"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>>>Why apologise,It doesn't matter.

>>
>>Ignorance and arrogance in such a tiny package of a mind.
>>You certainly are efficient.
>>
>>Such an efficient ****wit is a rare find indeed.

>
> I've filtered him. But I like this reply...
>>



 
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:16:08 +0000 (UTC), "Signman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>That's a self desription, have you tried medication?
>Or more importantly have you considered increasing your dosage?


Having now read your seven totally worthless contributions today, (two
of which were to one posting), and as it's evident you're intent upon
following me around like a sad puppy seeking attention, I've made an
assessment of your mental instability and lack of any moral fibre that
enables me with no reservation to class you as a premier ****wit,
above and beyond even the ****wittery of the paedophile Luckwill (are
you related, in family or 'interests' I wonder?), thus, you have the
somewhat belated honour of entering my twitlist.

Bye, arsehole.

 
So, lets get this straight and examine the facts.
firstly that you have been stalking me since my post about top posting seems
to allegedly allow you, inside the confines of your tiny mind, to conclude
that I am following *you*?
Secondly that you posted that you had *placed me in your killfile* has not
stopped you from posting inane drivel in reply to my posts, seems to
convieniently escape you, but then it would wouldn't it?
Thirdly your ability, without any formal qualification or experience, which
supposedly allows you to attempt to convince other readers to believe that
you can come to the conclusion that you can "make an assessment of *my
mental instability*"!!!!!
Fouthly, that you write about moral fiibre whilst proving your lack of
vocabulary and moral backbone by improving your posts by the use of foul
language.
Fithly, by introducing into your *lower class, peasant based argument*
without evidence (but it draws a crowd doesn't it) the suggestion that I am
either a paedophile or related to one.
Having examined these facts any sane person can only conclude that you are
a) of limited intelligence, your posts being the undeniable proof.
b) were probably the wannabe schoolbully that everyone laughed at and were
undoubtedly *too ill for the games period*.
c) without doubt wear slip-on shoes as tying laces would be outside the
genetic life-mapping provided at your conception.
d) feel the need to shout at the top of your voice to be heard at your place
of work as ordinarily you are ignored.
and
c) are intimidated by women, believing they are only good enough to cook,
clean and iron. (cos of their small feet...eh)
P.S
and you are probably 5'"2 tall with a pot belly

Notwithstanding your foul mouth original post about placing me in your
kill-file, you continue to post in reply to anything that I post.
Add to that the fact that each of your subsequent posts attacking
"Mother" <"@ {mother} @"@101fc.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Having now read your seven totally worthless contributions today, (two
> of which were to one posting), and as it's evident you're intent upon
> following me around like a sad puppy seeking attention, I've made an
> assessment of your mental instability and lack of any moral fibre that
> enables me with no reservation to class you as a premier ****wit,
> above and beyond even the ****wittery of the paedophile Luckwill (are
> you related, in family or 'interests' I wonder?), thus, you have the
> somewhat belated honour of entering my twitlist.
>
> Bye, arsehole.
>



 
Mother" <"@ {m} @ wrote:
| On 24 Aug 2005 04:12:10 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
|
|||| Open and welcoming, but intollerant of arrogant drunks
|||| coming in and telling us to put fresh sawdust down. (Should give
|||| you some idea what my 'local' is like...)
||
|| Sawdust? LUXURY!!!!!
|
| Well, usually last nights furniture...

Must visit your local if ever I'm in England again ...

Then again, perhaps not

Karen


 
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC), "Signman"
<[email protected]> made me spill my meths when he wrote:

>So, lets get this straight and examine the facts.

<sound of fishing reel whizzing in> Get the catch net Martyn...

>P.S
>and you are probably 5'"2 tall with a pot belly

Glasses, you forgot the thick glasses.


--
Wayne Davies - Mobile 07989 556213 - Harrogate, N.Yorks, UK
 
Signman wrote:
> No, there are no rules.
> Unless of course one includes foul language whensomeone doesnt do as they
> are told!


Yes there are rules for the smooth running of usenet, since before the
WWW was even a twinkle in it's dad's eyes, see:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/


--
Regards,
Danny

http://www.gaggia-espresso.com (a purely hobby site)

 
In message <[email protected]>
Stephen Hull <[email protected]> wrote:

>In message <[email protected]>
>Mother <"@ {m} @"@101fc.net> wrote:


>>As I said before, I'm not unduly bothered about a lot of top posting
>>and won't generally make a huge issue out of it. However, when
>>someone responds with something along the lines of "I don't care for
>>tradition, netiquette or manners, I like doing it this way, so screw
>>the rest of you" I sometimes wonder why they are here and why I
>>haven't got an automatic top-poster filter...


Good point indeed, why is he here?
The guy is obviously a troll and it is probably a wasted effort
on my behalf showing him the following quoting style link:
http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nnq/nquote.html

He won't read or abide by any of it and is therefore kill filed.

Steve.


--
Vehicle Painting Pointers: http://www.stephen.hull.btinternet.co.uk
Coach painting tips and techniques + Land Rover colour codes
Using a British RISC Operating System 100% immune to any Windows virus.
"Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce
 
1) Why am I "obviously" a troll? What off-topic posts have I made?
2) I own and run three Land Rovers so that might be a little clue as to why
I am here.
3) from your own link and wrong, I read it.


This document is a description of the traditionally accepted "quoting style"
in Usenet newsgroup postings. Please do not consider this to be a
"regulatory" document ("Thou shalt do it this way because we say so!"), but
rather as an "advocacy" document ("A lot of people think this is a good way
to do it, and here's why.").


4) Why the *imprortant* announcement about your killfile.....Oh I forgot,
better hung a sheep than a man eh?


"Stephen Hull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> Good point indeed, why is he here?
> The guy is obviously a troll and it is probably a wasted effort
> on my behalf showing him the following quoting style link:
> http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nnq/nquote.html
>
> He won't read or abide by any of it and is therefore kill filed.
>
> Steve.
>
>
> --
> Vehicle Painting Pointers: http://www.stephen.hull.btinternet.co.uk
> Coach painting tips and techniques + Land Rover colour codes
> Using a British RISC Operating System 100% immune to any Windows virus.
> "Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble". Henry Royce



 
Signman wrote:
> Err,NO. There are no RULES!!!
> There does exist a TRADITION.
> Well not everyone HAS to be a traditionalist.


It's a lot more than traditionalism. It's to do with interspersing
your comments in a readable fashion in the post you are replying to,
and snipping text that isn't relevent to your reply so that servers
the world over aren't forced to keep copies of duplicated text, which
adds up to gigabytes of wasted space.

You have to actually try to be awkward, since most newsreaders either
default to, or have the option to bottom post correctly.


--
Regards,
Danny

http://www.gaggia-espresso.com (a purely hobby site)

 
Back
Top