series fuel gauge

I

Ian Rawlings

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #41

On 2006-10-19, Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've still got a Dragon 32, somewhere. dunno if it still works,
> mind. 6804 processor, IIRC.

So've I, along with a brace of beebs, a few C64s and a range of other
old geek gear, even a Mattel Aquarius with a four-colour pen plotter!
Must dig it all out sometime before the bat **** rots it all away.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

 

O

Oily

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #42

"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On or around Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:27:52 +1300, EMB <[email protected]>
> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >JD wrote:
> >
> >> And I would not be surprised to hear that there were a significant
number of
> >> industrial applications in current use running CP/M.
> >
> >There certainly are - I look after several.
>
> There are persistent rumours of a nuclear reactor run by a gaggle of 8
> commodore pets.

I heard that the London Underground is run by BBCs, izzatso?

Martin

> --
> Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
> "The boys are dreaming wicked or of the bucking ranches of the night and
> the jollyrodgered sea." Dylan Thomas (1914 - 1953) Under milk wood

 

O

Oily

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #43

"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> On or around Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:53:59 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >On 2006-10-18, steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> If its proper embedded, there isn't ROOM for an OS.
> >>
> >>
> >> Steve, writing for 8 bitters still
> >
> >8 bitters? Nancy boy ;-) ISTR PIDs coming in four bits.
> >
> >One of my favourite brain-bending machines of yesteryear was a British
> >machine IIRC, known as the DAP. It used a one-bit processor, 1024 of
> >them in an array... At 10MHz it could render a high-res raytrace in 5
> >seconds that took a high-powered sparcstation of the day over 2 hours
> >to generate. That was without a floating-point unit as well, just
> >integer maths. Nice little machine, provided you could program FORTRAN.
>
> I've still got a Dragon 32, somewhere. dunno if it still works, mind.
6804
> processor, IIRC.
>

An' I've still got a TRS80 16k level 2 that still works!

Martin

> --
> Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
> Soon shall thy arm, unconquered steam! afar Drag the slow barge, or
> drive the rapid car; Or on wide-waving wings expanded bear the
> flying chariot through the field of air.- Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802)

 

E

EMB

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #44

Ian Rawlings wrote:
> On 2006-10-19, Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've still got a Dragon 32, somewhere. dunno if it still works,
>> mind. 6804 processor, IIRC.
>
> So've I, along with a brace of beebs, a few C64s and a range of other
> old geek gear, even a Mattel Aquarius with a four-colour pen plotter!
> Must dig it all out sometime before the bat **** rots it all away.
>

I'll raise you a Kaypro II, a VIC20 and a Wang 2200T (and most other
members of the CS/2200 family).

--
EMB

 

I

Ian Rawlings

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #45

On 2006-10-19, EMB <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'll raise you a Kaypro II, a VIC20 and a Wang 2200T (and most other
> members of the CS/2200 family).

I think I have a vic 20 but you've trumped me with the Kaypro and the
Wang, although I used to have a Nascom some time ago, but I was a kid
at the time so pulled it apart and it vanished over the years!

How about table-top games of Astro Wars, Scramble and Munchman? ;-) I
can still wrap the score on Astro Wars.

My current junk of this type;

http://www.handheldmuseum.com/Grandstand/Astro.htm
http://www.handheldmuseum.com/Grandstand/Scramble.htm
http://www.handheldmuseum.com/Grandstand/Munch.htm
http://www.handheldmuseum.com/Grandstand/MiniMunch.htm

There's a Frogger up there somewhere too, not to mention two Big Traks
and a trailer...

What am I doing sitting at my desk working.. I should be up in the loft.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

 

I

Ian Rawlings

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #46

On 2006-10-19, Oily <[email protected]> wrote:

> I heard that the London Underground is run by BBCs, izzatso?

Wot, using the "tube" interface?

Hehehe...

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #47

On or around Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:53:44 +0100, Ian Rawlings
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>On 2006-10-19, Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've still got a Dragon 32, somewhere. dunno if it still works,
>> mind. 6804 processor, IIRC.
>
>So've I, along with a brace of beebs, a few C64s and a range of other
>old geek gear, even a Mattel Aquarius with a four-colour pen plotter!
>Must dig it all out sometime before the bat **** rots it all away.

actually, I think it's a 6809.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankind; and
therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee"
John Donne (1571? - 1631) Devotions, XVII

 

I

Ian Rawlings

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #48

On 2006-10-19, Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:

> actually, I think it's a 6809.

Motorola 6809E @ 0.89 MHz according to wikipedia;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_32/64

I've never actually fired mine up yet, it's item number 2.364x10^13 on
my todo list, one above "repair wing on landy".

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #49

On or around Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:33:40 +0100, Ian Rawlings
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>On 2006-10-19, Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> actually, I think it's a 6809.
>
>Motorola 6809E @ 0.89 MHz according to wikipedia;
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_32/64
>

well well.

One thing they did have was lovely joysticks, with erm... <counts on
fingers> 6 bit (I think) A-D on each axis. Programming wise, the axes went
from 0-63 each way, so that 0,0 was bottom left and 63,63 was top right.

Made for excellent control of flying games and the like. This is something
sadly lacking from more or less everything else - switched on-off joysticks
are nowhere near as good.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
If all be true that I do think, There are five reasons we should drink;
Good wine, a friend, or being dry, Or lest we should be by and by;
Or any other reason why. - Henry Aldrich (1647 - 1710)

 

O

Oily

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #50

"Ian Rawlings" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2006-10-19, Oily <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I heard that the London Underground is run by BBCs, izzatso?
>
> Wot, using the "tube" interface?
>
> Hehehe...
>
>
Now would probably be even funnier if I knew what a 'tube interface' was,
not being a computer techie. ;-)

Martin

 

I

Ian Rawlings

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #51

On 2006-10-19, Oily <[email protected]> wrote:

> Now would probably be even funnier if I knew what a 'tube interface' was,
> not being a computer techie. ;-)

Ah, sorry, the BBC computer has an interface on the bottom labelled
"tube", it was used mainly to connect a second processor, I wonder if
that's where the notion that the underground system was controlled by
them came from!

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

 

T

Tom Woods

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #52

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:13:49 +0100, "Oily"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news[email protected]...
>> On or around Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:53:59 +0100, Ian Rawlings
>> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>>
>> >On 2006-10-18, steve <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> If its proper embedded, there isn't ROOM for an OS.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Steve, writing for 8 bitters still
>> >
>> >8 bitters? Nancy boy ;-) ISTR PIDs coming in four bits.
>> >
>> >One of my favourite brain-bending machines of yesteryear was a British
>> >machine IIRC, known as the DAP. It used a one-bit processor, 1024 of
>> >them in an array... At 10MHz it could render a high-res raytrace in 5
>> >seconds that took a high-powered sparcstation of the day over 2 hours
>> >to generate. That was without a floating-point unit as well, just
>> >integer maths. Nice little machine, provided you could program FORTRAN.
>>
>> I've still got a Dragon 32, somewhere. dunno if it still works, mind.
>6804
>> processor, IIRC.
>>
>
>An' I've still got a TRS80 16k level 2 that still works!
>
If were going for obscure i've got a tandy newbrain with a built in
screen

 

O

Oily

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #53

"Ian Rawlings" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2006-10-19, Oily <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Now would probably be even funnier if I knew what a 'tube interface'
was,
> > not being a computer techie. ;-)
>
> Ah, sorry, the BBC computer has an interface on the bottom labelled
> "tube", it was used mainly to connect a second processor, I wonder if
> that's where the notion that the underground system was controlled by
> them came from!
>
I think whoever told me was serious but you're probably right. I've still
got a Model B around somewhere, I'll have a look tomorrow and see if I can
figure out what that is though I'm pretty sure they said the 'BBC Master'.

Martin

 

I

Ian Rawlings

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #54

On 2006-10-19, Tom Woods <[email protected]> wrote:

> If were going for obscure i've got a tandy newbrain with a built in
> screen

Tandy? I thought it was Grundy?

"Grundy", sounds like a west country manufacturer ;-)

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

 

O

Oily

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #55

"Tom Woods" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:13:49 +0100, "Oily"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news[email protected]...
> >> On or around Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:53:59 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> >> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
> >>
> >> >On 2006-10-18, steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> If its proper embedded, there isn't ROOM for an OS.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Steve, writing for 8 bitters still
> >> >
> >> >8 bitters? Nancy boy ;-) ISTR PIDs coming in four bits.
> >> >
> >> >One of my favourite brain-bending machines of yesteryear was a British
> >> >machine IIRC, known as the DAP. It used a one-bit processor, 1024 of
> >> >them in an array... At 10MHz it could render a high-res raytrace in 5
> >> >seconds that took a high-powered sparcstation of the day over 2 hours
> >> >to generate. That was without a floating-point unit as well, just
> >> >integer maths. Nice little machine, provided you could program
FORTRAN.
> >>
> >> I've still got a Dragon 32, somewhere. dunno if it still works, mind.
> >6804
> >> processor, IIRC.
> >>
> >
> >An' I've still got a TRS80 16k level 2 that still works!
> >
> If were going for obscure i've got a tandy newbrain with a built in
> screen

Still got an Acorn Atom, a Sinclair ZX81(which I had given to me), a BBC
Model B and some bits of a Ferranti Advance left over (which has arrays of
tubular glass encased transistors, not chips). ;-)

Martin

 

I

Ian Rawlings

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #56

On 2006-10-19, Oily <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think whoever told me was serious but you're probably right. I've still
> got a Model B around somewhere, I'll have a look tomorrow and see if I can
> figure out what that is though I'm pretty sure they said the 'BBC Master'.

All the BBCs apart from the model 'A' had the tube IIRC, but the beebs
were popular for many things involving external control as they had a
decent amount of external communication hardware. Nice little
machines, I'll get an econet up and running one of these days with my
beebs on it.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!

 

S

steve

Guest

• Oct 19, 2006

• #57

Austin Shackles wrote:

> I've still got a Dragon 32, somewhere. dunno if it still works, mind. 6804
> processor, IIRC.
If it doesn't the guy who designed it is a personal acquaintance of mine....

Steve