Plod have been busy today

Moron said:

So these people lost their Landrovers permenently ?
No appeal ?

Click to expand...

Where does it say that?

JimS said:

Off road motorcycle officers. They get paid for that?

Click to expand...

They even have a display team.


The Purple Helmets or summink

blue beasty said:

Where does it say that?

Click to expand...

Your sarcasm fell on deaf ears .........I asked if they lost their landrovers permenently ........ a simple question , just an answer needed , not sarcasm thanks

Turboman said:

No. They get them back when they pay the fine.

Click to expand...

Thanks

Moron said:

Thanks

Click to expand...

Have a google of Section 59 , that is what plod uses to seize the motors and teach the naughty kids a lesson.

Cheers

neilly said:

Have a google of Section 59 , that is what plod uses to seize the motors and teach the naughty kids a lesson.

Cheers

Click to expand...

Bloody Hell.........I just read all about it............I wonder how many coppers have abused that section 59 to "teach someone a lesson"

Moron said:

Bloody Hell.........I just read all about it............I wonder how many coppers have abused that section 59 to "teach someone a lesson"

Click to expand...

Not really heard of it. Normally they have em bang to rights, Guvnor!

Turboman said:

Not really heard of it. Normally they have em bang to rights, Guvnor!

Click to expand...

Thank fook fer that

Turboman said:

Not really heard of it. Normally they have em bang to rights, Guvnor!

Click to expand...

Bet they still cry in their cornflakes in the morning..LOL.....Serves em right. Hang em high , I say HANG EM HIGH!!

Cheers

Moron said:

Thank fook fer that

Click to expand...

Not really the kind of evidence it is easy to fabricate. You are either on a legal byway, or off it.

And usually the drivers will be in a group, so they have witnesses to police conduct. And of course, nowadays GPS can establish position to within a few metres.

Turboman said:

Not really the kind of evidence it is easy to fabricate. You are either on a legal byway, or off it.

And usually the drivers will be in a group, so they have witnesses to police conduct. And of course, nowadays GPS can establish position to within a few metres.

Click to expand...

Yeah , I can see how that would work ( thumbs up emote)

Turboman said:

Not really the kind of evidence it is easy to fabricate. You are either on a legal byway, or off it.

And usually the drivers will be in a group, so they have witnesses to police conduct. And of course, nowadays GPS can establish position to within a few metres.

Click to expand...

Pus , it seems (at least on the idiot box) that all Cops are now cammed up for evidence .

Cheers

Yep ......I was thinking more of the times I've watched "Interceptors".........a couple of the coppers came across as arrogant with admittedly young drivers , but yes as you pointed out with video cams etc , not easy to fit someone up as it were ( other criminal offences are available)

Moron said:

Yep ......I was thinking more of the times I've watched "Interceptors".........a couple of the coppers came across as arrogant with admittedly young drivers , but yes as you pointed out with video cams etc , not easy to fit someone up as it were ( other criminal offences are available)

Click to expand...

Not as easy for coppers to fit people up. Not as easy for people to intimidate police or do a runner either.

Turboman said:

Cos it's a bridleway, not a BOAT.

Click to expand...

So you can ride an animal that's going to **** everywhere down there, but you can't drive a car?

Admittedly I can only see whats in the pics on 'ere, but it looks like a perfectly decent road to take a Landie.

Surely horses and and ramblers should stick to paths through fields.

GrumpyGel said:

So you can ride an animal that's going to **** everywhere down there, but you can't drive a car?

Admittedly I can only see whats in the pics on 'ere, but it looks like a perfectly decent road to take a Landie.

Surely horses and and ramblers should stick to paths through fields.

Click to expand...

It isn't to do with what the road is like. It is to do with how the route was classified.

Moron said:

Your sarcasm fell on deaf ears .........I asked if they lost their landrovers permenently ........ a simple question , just an answer needed , not sarcasm thanks

Click to expand...

Oh I'm terribly sorry.

Where does it say that dickhead?





Better?

GrumpyGel said:

So you can ride an animal that's going to **** everywhere down there, but you can't drive a car?

Click to expand...

You seem confused, another strange thing is you cannot ride a horse on the Motorway...go figure.... weird init?...LOL.

Cheers

blue beasty said:

Oh I'm terribly sorry.

Where does it say that dickhead?





Better?

Click to expand...

Yes , that I can understand

Turboman said:

There is no obligation to have signs. There is a legal obligation on users to inform themselves on the nature of a right of way by use of the Definitive Map.

Click to expand...

I know this is accurate, but I personally think its a load of sh!te too!
If green lanes really are supposedly council maintained roads etc and all the stuff the requirements that go with driving them, like insurance, wearing seat belts etc, then I personally think they should be sign posted, just like every other road we drive.

It would probably defuse the genuine mistakes that some people make, and reassure responsible users that they are in the right.

All (most) bridleways are signposted, but it can be confusing in concern to UCR's which may or may not have vehicular rights over them. Just my opinion mind