A
Austin Shackles
Guest
On or around Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:54:02 -0000, "Nige"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>Austin Shackles wrote:
>> On or around Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:31:32 +0000, Tim Hobbs
>> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>>
>>>> I tried the 300d & whilst it took great pictures, the build quality
>>>> ins't great. I got a Nikon D70 & that is a bloody ace camera.
>>>>
>>>> Nige
>>>
>>> There is the EOS 10D which is virtually identical (in fact slightly
>>> higher) spec but not in a stupid reflective plastic body!
>>
>> mind, none of these are much like what Martyn was after.
>
>True enough, but to be fair the G6 is what he needs & I'm gonna take mine to show him tomorrow. It is
>easily the best 'amalgamation' of SLR & compact types available.
I've a lot of time for the 700-UZ Oly, mind, although the one I really
fancied was it's big brother, the 2100 which has image stabilisation as
well. But tyhe big one is a lot bigger and in fact the 700 UZ has the
better spec, bar for the IS.
the later ones, such as the 750, are a bit better spec again, most notably
more resolution in the CCD.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
In Touch: Get in touch with yourself by touching yourself.
If somebody is watching, stop touching yourself.
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>Austin Shackles wrote:
>> On or around Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:31:32 +0000, Tim Hobbs
>> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>>
>>>> I tried the 300d & whilst it took great pictures, the build quality
>>>> ins't great. I got a Nikon D70 & that is a bloody ace camera.
>>>>
>>>> Nige
>>>
>>> There is the EOS 10D which is virtually identical (in fact slightly
>>> higher) spec but not in a stupid reflective plastic body!
>>
>> mind, none of these are much like what Martyn was after.
>
>True enough, but to be fair the G6 is what he needs & I'm gonna take mine to show him tomorrow. It is
>easily the best 'amalgamation' of SLR & compact types available.
I've a lot of time for the 700-UZ Oly, mind, although the one I really
fancied was it's big brother, the 2100 which has image stabilisation as
well. But tyhe big one is a lot bigger and in fact the 700 UZ has the
better spec, bar for the IS.
the later ones, such as the 750, are a bit better spec again, most notably
more resolution in the CCD.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
In Touch: Get in touch with yourself by touching yourself.
If somebody is watching, stop touching yourself.
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.