OT - Larry thought he'd seen it all, but this beats the lot!

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

"beamendsltd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:43f0a2414d%[email protected]...
>
> I'm not so sure aabout them not innovating any more......
> (Cut to previous live as a software engineer)
> Citroen had a all CAN bus version of the XM (not available
> in the UK - officially, we got ours from France) - way
> ahead of everyone else. A few years ago (4?) they were
> looking like being first to market with either 36 or 42
> volt systems, again way ahead of the rest.
> Personaly I don't like Citroen, but they are probably
> the most inovative car maker - certainly in Europe.
>
> Richard
>

I'll second that, some of their designers must be amazingly intuitive
"out-of-the-box" thinkers.
BUT- having worked on some of their products and seen how they design
systems to be unfixable by your average joe mechanic (more so than most
other manufacturers), I'd never buy one. Certain models with odd-size brake
pipe and special fittings that can only be purchased from Citroen spring to
mind, now there is absolutely no logic behind that move other than to force
the return of the car to the $tealer.
Badger.


 
Austin Shackles wrote:

> On or around Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:13:32 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
>>
>>
>>JD wrote:
>> it still has safety features not
>>> yet common - for example you can see forward with the bonnet open and
>>> back with the boot open.
>>> JD

>>
>>Seems very safe to drive around with the bonnet and boot open......:)))
>>Erik-Jan.

>
> but if the bonnet managed to come open on the motorway, I know I'd be
> pleased if I could still see.
>

And how many parents have backed over their small children because they
could not see behind them?
JD
 


Austin Shackles wrote:
>
> On or around Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:13:32 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >
> >
> >JD wrote:
> > it still has safety features not
> >> yet common - for example you can see forward with the bonnet open and back
> >> with the boot open.
> >> JD

> >
> >Seems very safe to drive around with the bonnet and boot open......:)))
> >Erik-Jan.

>
> but if the bonnet managed to come open on the motorway, I know I'd be
> pleased if I could still see.


If this happens with Citroen's why did they skip this safety feature on
newer models....;-)
Erik-Jan.



> --
> Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
> Soon shall thy arm, unconquered steam! afar Drag the slow barge, or
> drive the rapid car; Or on wide-waving wings expanded bear the
> flying chariot through the field of air.- Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802)


--
The Meeting Place for Photography
http://www.fotograaf.com
Fotofestival Naarden Festival-OFF
http://www.festival-off.nl
Erik-Jan Geniets.
Phone: +31-(0)6.55.78.60.31
 


JD wrote:

> >

> And how many parents have backed over their small children because they
> could not see behind them?
> JD


So the best safety feature would be telling them not to drive with the
bonnet or boot open.
At he other hand. This wasn't a safety feature but a coincidence which
came with the design of the car.
Kind regards,
Erik-Jan.
 


beamendsltd wrote:

> Citroen had a all CAN bus version of the XM (not available


What is a 'CAN bus'?
Erik-Jan.
 
On or around Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:10:55 +0000 (UTC), "Badger"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>I'll second that, some of their designers must be amazingly intuitive
>"out-of-the-box" thinkers.
>BUT- having worked on some of their products and seen how they design
>systems to be unfixable by your average joe mechanic (more so than most
>other manufacturers), I'd never buy one. Certain models with odd-size brake
>pipe and special fittings that can only be purchased from Citroen spring to
>mind, now there is absolutely no logic behind that move other than to force
>the return of the car to the $tealer.


the small-bore brake/hydraulic pipes are to do with the high pressures,
ISTR. larger bore pipes would need to be heavier to be strong enough, or
something.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
"There are three sorts of people in the world - those who can count,
and those who can't" (Anon)
 
On or around Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:42:03 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>
>
>beamendsltd wrote:
>
>> Citroen had a all CAN bus version of the XM (not available

>
>What is a 'CAN bus'?
>Erik-Jan.


used on one of the modern Range Rovers, is it the P38 or the new one?

instead of wires running all over the vehicle carrying current, you have a
power supply, earth and data connection to (e.g.) yer rear light cluster,
and when you want the rear lights on, instead of switching the current and
sending it down a wire, the BECM or equivalent sends a message to the rear
light cluster telling it to switch the rearlight on.

OWTTE...

has advantages, but then again, it's far less easily fixed.
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
"You praise the firm restraint with which they write -_
I'm with you there, of course: They use the snaffle and the bit
alright, but where's the bloody horse? - Roy Campbell (1902-1957)
 


Austin Shackles wrote:
>
> On or around Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:42:03 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >
> >
> >beamendsltd wrote:
> >
> >> Citroen had a all CAN bus version of the XM (not available

> >
> >What is a 'CAN bus'?
> >Erik-Jan.

>
> used on one of the modern Range Rovers, is it the P38 or the new one?
>
> instead of wires running all over the vehicle carrying current, you have a
> power supply, earth and data connection to (e.g.) yer rear light cluster,
> and when you want the rear lights on, instead of switching the current and
> sending it down a wire, the BECM or equivalent sends a message to the rear
> light cluster telling it to switch the rearlight on.
>
> OWTTE...
>
> has advantages, but then again, it's far less easily fixed.

Thanks.
So at has some sort of relays all over the car?
Erik-Jan.
 
In message <[email protected]>
Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:

> On or around Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:10:55 +0000 (UTC), "Badger"
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >I'll second that, some of their designers must be amazingly intuitive
> >"out-of-the-box" thinkers.
> >BUT- having worked on some of their products and seen how they design
> >systems to be unfixable by your average joe mechanic (more so than most
> >other manufacturers), I'd never buy one. Certain models with odd-size brake
> >pipe and special fittings that can only be purchased from Citroen spring to
> >mind, now there is absolutely no logic behind that move other than to force
> >the return of the car to the $tealer.

>
> the small-bore brake/hydraulic pipes are to do with the high pressures,
> ISTR. larger bore pipes would need to be heavier to be strong enough, or
> something.


I suspect that the odd size pipes are due to their using
(for a while, anyway) an accumulator type brake system -
also used by Rolls Royce for quite a while too (the
Citroen system, that is).

Richard
--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Helping keep Land Rovers on and off the road to annoy the Lib Dems
 
In message <[email protected]>
Erik-Jan Geniets <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Austin Shackles wrote:
> >
> > On or around Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:42:03 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
> > <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >beamendsltd wrote:
> > >
> > >> Citroen had a all CAN bus version of the XM (not available
> > >
> > >What is a 'CAN bus'?
> > >Erik-Jan.

> >
> > used on one of the modern Range Rovers, is it the P38 or the new one?
> >
> > instead of wires running all over the vehicle carrying current, you have a
> > power supply, earth and data connection to (e.g.) yer rear light cluster,
> > and when you want the rear lights on, instead of switching the current and
> > sending it down a wire, the BECM or equivalent sends a message to the rear
> > light cluster telling it to switch the rearlight on.
> >
> > OWTTE...
> >
> > has advantages, but then again, it's far less easily fixed.

> Thanks.
> So at has some sort of relays all over the car?
> Erik-Jan.


Ah! My favourite subject! I was Feature Owner for the CAN bus
on the "Medium Size Bentley".....

The great advantage of CAN (or VAN etc) Bus systems is that
it removes the need for all those nasty wires (the harness)
runing round the vehicle, thus reducing design complexity,
vastly increasing realiability and flexibility. Bearing
in mind the harness is one of the most expensive, heavy
and (to an extent) unreliable components of a vehicle, then:

The entire harness can be done away with and replaced by
four wires that visit each "electrical point" in the vehicle.
This uses standard connectors, standard cable, wieghs
almost nothing and costs buggger all. However, each electrical
point increases in complexity - a bit. Although we had a Jag
doing just this about 8 years ago, no one has *fully*
implemented yet - there's still a lot of cable about.

So, for example, the rear light cluster. A message is
broadcast from the Body Controller ECU (could be straight
from the brake light switch if it had a bus controller).
A standard IC in the rear light cluster spots the message
and says "Ah ha! Thats for me" and then decodes the contents
of the message.... "switch on the brake light on" - which it
does. So far it's no different to cable, but now the good
stuff kicks in. The brake light bulb is blown. The light
cluster controller (which is electronic, no relays) can now
do things like :
Use the tail light instead if the lights are not on, or flash
the tail light rapidly as a back up if the lights are on.
It also broadcasts a message telling the rest of the vehicle
ECU's (if they are interested) that the failure has occured.
Most likely in this case, the Body Controller would tell the
driver that the bulb (or more than a given percentage of LED's)
has failed, and could then log the fault for the next service
or whatever. If an ECU "disappears" from the bus through damage
or something, then the message originator can re-try for a while,
and getting no response, tell other ECU's to act accordingly.

If you extrapolate this functionality throughout the vehicle,
then the possibilities are endless. When the car is built, the
ECU's attached to the system can determine automatically what
features are attached to the vehicle - no different harnesses
for different spec vehicles. Upgrades can be truly plug-and-play,
or even enabled using a code when the extra dosh is handed over.
If the keys have different codes, then as well as seats,
mirrors etc being moved for that person, the performance of
the vehicle can be modified - e.g. Daddy can have full blown
sports mode, young Rebecca can have much reduced performance to
save on insurance - all with no extra cable.
You can log all this to give info leading up to an accident -
even who's key was being used - if Rebecca was using Daddy's
key then the insurance could be invalidated etc.

Compared to the above, the tradition harness doesn't even get
a look in! We had an entire Jag on a 6x4ft bit of chipboard
for demo purposes (as well as a real car!) - the real cars
harness would have taken (at least) two of us to carry it.


Personaly, I drive a 200Tdi 110 - not an ECU in sight. but then
I don't want fancy toys anyway......

There are two flavours of CAN - high-speed and low-speed, the
high speed flavour is for engine management etc, and low-speed
for lower demand systems. It is an amazingly robust system,
originaly designed for machine and factory automation and
remote control. There were other contenders (VAN being one),
but unless things have changed recntly, CAN has won the day.

Richard

--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Helping keep Land Rovers on and off the road to annoy the Lib Dems
 
On or around Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:06:37 +0000 (UTC), beamendsltd
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>In message <[email protected]>
> Austin Shackles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> the small-bore brake/hydraulic pipes are to do with the high pressures,
>> ISTR. larger bore pipes would need to be heavier to be strong enough, or
>> something.

>
>I suspect that the odd size pipes are due to their using
>(for a while, anyway) an accumulator type brake system -
>also used by Rolls Royce for quite a while too (the
>Citroen system, that is).


The BX, CX and probably Xantia and XM too use a single high-pressure
hydraulic system for suspension, brakes and steering. On the BX at least,
the front brakes are supplied from the high-pressure supply, while the back
brakes are supplied from downstream of the rear suspension, thus making them
load-dependant, in rather a neat way which doesn't require a complicated
gadget with linkages to go wrong.

'course, instead, it has a CGWLTGW that adjusts the ride height...

and yes, the system has an accumulator. Mind, so does the ABS on my sierra,
except that the ford has an electric, rather than engine-driven, pump.


--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
"I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine... War is hell"
Gen. Sherman (1820-1891) Attr. words in Address at Michigan Military
Academy, 19 June 1879.
 
Back
Top