Mud Flaps - Legal Question..?

M

McBad

Guest

• Apr 9, 2005

• #1

Do you have to have them (on the rear of a 90)? I've taken mine off, to
avoid them being ripped off, but I'm wondering if I'm infringing any law; I
haven't seen many others around without rear mud-flaps.

Thanks,

M

 

B

bones

Guest

• Apr 9, 2005

• #2

Mine has gone through 2 mot's without them.

 

9

90ninety

Guest

• Apr 9, 2005

• #3

Mine got damaged twice - at RTV trials. Removed them, cut them short, bolted
in place of rear
grab handles. Look OK, MOT OK, work OK, don't get damaged.

Stew.


"McBad" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Do you have to have them (on the rear of a 90)? I've taken mine off, to
> avoid them being ripped off, but I'm wondering if I'm infringing any law;
> I
> haven't seen many others around without rear mud-flaps.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M
>
>

 

H

hugh

Guest

• Apr 9, 2005

• #4

In message <[email protected]>, McBad
<[email protected]> writes
>Do you have to have them (on the rear of a 90)? I've taken mine off, to
>avoid them being ripped off, but I'm wondering if I'm infringing any law; I
>haven't seen many others around without rear mud-flaps.
>
>Thanks,
>
>M
>
>
No legal requirement for mudflaps. I've got 3 on mine and it's gone thro
MOTs OK. My ex mil didn't have any.
--
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting

 

M

McBad

Guest

• Apr 10, 2005

• #5

Thanks all. I'll leave them off. The only parts of my chassis that have
rusted are the bits where the mud-flaps bolted on and had trapped wet mud...

Cheers,

M