FS Defender 90, 200 TDI, 1991(J)

118,000 miles, blue with white roof, van sides.
Three seats in front and one fold down one in back. Middle front seat has a
three point harness.
Wiring and fitting for radio (radio cassette fitted, but cassette is
broken!)
Rear load liner
Rear fold down step
Heated rear window and wash/wipe
Has what looks like the original handbook
Non-standard wheels, not sure what they are called, but have seen them on a
few LRs locally

Has a replacement service book with stamps at:
75310 miles service
76624 miles cam belt changed
80177 miles service
84500 miles service
91523 miles service
96095 miles service
101507 miles service
Has had a new clutch fitted at 115351 miles (by a specialist with a receipt
to prove)
Has had a new diesel tank at 116875 miles (by a specialist with a receipt to
prove)

Condition is as you would expect for a Land Rover of this age really. The
body work has a few small nicks and dents, but nothing that is out of
character or which needs repair. It has the original "Defender 90" flashes
on the doors and sides. There is a minimal amount of electrolyte corrosion
on the bottom of the three doors. There is a small amount of corrosion on
small areas of the body cappings.

The chassis and bulkhead are fine. The interior is pretty good, not A1,
but certainly not an old farm truck! All lights work, except for the
interior one (not the bulb at fault). Heater blows strongly and delivers
hot air when it should!

It drives really well and I am not aware of any engine or drive problems
HI/LO, Diff lock, brakes etc etc all work as they should.

I will put an MOT on it when it is sold as the current one only has a couple
of months to run.

Available to view in Bristol area. Photos available if required. E-mail me
if you wish to see them or if you require any more information. My mobile
is 07962 149068 should you wish to speak to me about this Land Rover. I am
looking for £4200, but not adverse to a "reasonable" offer!!

Frazer

On or around Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:16:13 +0000 (UTC), "F"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>Middle front seat has a
>three point harness.

how?

"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On or around Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:16:13 +0000 (UTC), "F"
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >Middle front seat has a
> >three point harness.
>
> how?
>

That could be very painful in a crash if its the only way I'm thinking of?????

Nige

Shouldn't be a problem. On my SIII I have the inertia reels on the rear
bulkhead, and no door pillar mounted seatbelt runners - rather like the
original RR setup. Very safe, and avoids having to mess about with seatbelts
when taking the roof off. Can't see any reason why the middle couldn't be
set up like that.

Andy

"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On or around Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:16:13 +0000 (UTC), "F"
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >Middle front seat has a
> >three point harness.
>
> how?
>

On or around Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:30:03 +0100, "Andy Warner"
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>Shouldn't be a problem. On my SIII I have the inertia reels on the rear
>bulkhead, and no door pillar mounted seatbelt runners - rather like the
>original RR setup. Very safe, and avoids having to mess about with seatbelts
>when taking the roof off. Can't see any reason why the middle couldn't be
>set up like that.

I guess it could. I was bothered about the lack of a top anchor point, but
you could put one on the bulkhead I suppose. If new enough it already has
the bottom mountings, for a lap belt.

Hi,

Exactly that. The top is fixed to the bulkhead, not the strongest
arrangement, but better than nothing. The remaining two straps fix to the
existing mounting points. I felt that this was a better option than a lap
belt on it's own, even with the limitations of the bulkhead mounting. It
was only used for my eldest, whose shoulders did not come up to the top of
the seat!

Go on make me an offer!!

Frazer

"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On or around Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:30:03 +0100, "Andy Warner"
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >Shouldn't be a problem. On my SIII I have the inertia reels on the rear
> >bulkhead, and no door pillar mounted seatbelt runners - rather like the
> >original RR setup. Very safe, and avoids having to mess about with
seatbelts
> >when taking the roof off. Can't see any reason why the middle couldn't be
> >set up like that.
>
> I guess it could. I was bothered about the lack of a top anchor point,
but
> you could put one on the bulkhead I suppose. If new enough it already has
> the bottom mountings, for a lap belt.
>

A matter of choice ultimatly.

I was in a crash once, where seatbelts notwithstanding the angle of the
impact meant that I hit my head on the passenger door glass, not that my
head had much in it to be harmed


--
Larry
Series 3 rust and holes


"F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hi,
>
> Exactly that. The top is fixed to the bulkhead, not the strongest
> arrangement, but better than nothing. The remaining two straps fix to the
> existing mounting points. I felt that this was a better option than a lap
> belt on it's own, even with the limitations of the bulkhead mounting. It
> was only used for my eldest, whose shoulders did not come up to the top of
> the seat!
>
> Go on make me an offer!!
>
> Frazer
>
> "Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>