In message <
[email protected]>, Austin Shackles
<
[email protected]> writes
>On or around Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:19:28 +1300, EMB <[email protected]>
>enlightened us thusly:
>
>>Austin Shackles wrote:
>>>
>>> interestingly, the rear drum brakes on the minibus snatch like a bastard
>>> initially when cold or damp, but having been used a bit, they behave more
>>> normally. Mebbe they need new linings as well...
>>
>>Whip the drums off and chamfer the leading edge of the linings - like we
>>was all taught to at mechanics school in the old days, and like they
>>don't teach no more.
>
>hmmm. that's a point - cycle drum brakes we sell have chamfered leading
>edges... dunno if they are on the bus, probably not. any particular angle?
I never did anything even remotely mechanical at school or during my
working life but I picked up the habit of chamfering leading edges over
50 years ago, when I used to struggle to keep my ancient motorbike
working. At that time you bought un-drilled linings and had to drill and
countersink the rivet holes yourself but, over the years, pre-drilled
linings became available, followed by pre-lined, exchange shoes, the
first of which were riveted and then bonded ones came along.
I continued chamfering with all the motorbikes, cars and Series Land
Rovers I owned over subsequent years, and must have breathed in a quite
a bit of asbestos dust along the way. However, I didn't do it on LR
hand-brakes, where I thought a bit of extra bite would be a bonus.
I don't know what the angle should be, I just filed away until it looked
right and didn't remove too much of the contact area.
Was it all necessary? I don't know, but maybe an expert on here will
tell us. Possibly it dates from the time when linings were sometimes
rather badly and insecurely riveted to the shoes, and chamfering reduced
the chance of them becoming detached. I remember wondering when I first
bought pre-lined shoes why they were not pre-chamfered. Maybe the
linings had been attached so well that there was thought to be no need..
--
Peter