BFG tyre choices????? need some help!

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

EDF 110

Member
Posts
26
Location
ESSEX
Hi all
Im currently doing some research for my next tyres....
My 110 hi cap came half warn BFG AT @ 285/75/16
About 2 years ago i replaced the fronts with KUMO MT's ( :wh :bum Yes i know running different tyres and cheap one at that, but they were the same Od and all i could afford at the time)
Im now at a stage where the tyres will pass the MOT but id say not make it past Feb/March!?
SO the big decision is what to go for next
My criteria
1. Nice and tall to alter the gearing and try and improve MPG (bearing in mind, after getting up to date with my account/books, just worked out ive spent £4600 on diesel over the last 8 months!!)
2. Quiter would be nice (not that any landy is quiet :doh2)
3. Good mileage potential
4. Peace of mind that im not going to get stuck.
Now if im totally honest the Kumo's i have had on the front have been a lovley tyre, have worn the same rate as the BFG MT's on the 'other 110'. They are how ever a softer tyre and have less ply in the walls. think only 2 or 3?
SO although ive not have any issues with them, i think i will go back to BFG.
Maybe im being a snob or following the trend, but id say 85% of folk have BFG and rate them so they must be good, also on a shallow note i do like the look of them on a landy.
Ive just got a price on 8 BFG MT's @ 285/75/16 from my local trade supplier. Have been quoted £119.65 + VAT each!!??
So basically £1000 for the 2 sets plus £30 for my mate to fit and ballence them.

Do i go back to the At's, bearing in mind people say they are better for MPG (although im not convinced) but also run the risk of rendering the hicap useless of road, as i got stuck a few times with the AT's on.
Im a builder, so although 90% is tarmac, when i do go off road i need to know i'll be ok pulling a digger and trailer or a ton of sand across a field!!! :??
Also my big concern is buying a tyre which is taller, im not fussed about loosing a bit of width. but the taller the tyre the better MPG as far as im concerned. THe hi cap had the heavy duty rear so lots of room at back and the front will have a 2"+ lift (as hicaps always sit nose down!! :mm). so clearence is not an issue.
Im sure everyone will give different answers rendering the thread in conclusive, but if i could maybe get some accurate informaion, hopefully i will be able to make an educated guess as to what to do.
 
I had BFG AT,worn em out.I now have some cheaparse RECIP TRIALS at £58+ so being about half the price of BFG and fine off road ideal.Bit bloody lumpy at 5mph on the road but cheap and a good 20mm of tread.Ive 265/75/16 on a 2"lift with only a small issue with lefthand lock.They are very big tyres and had no probs with lock on the BFG,
If its road work id go BFG AT as they have manners at 90mph!if its local work who cares and get the cheap MUDS dude...
 
Hi all
Im currently doing some research for my next tyres....
My 110 hi cap came half warn BFG AT @ 285/75/16
About 2 years ago i replaced the fronts with KUMO MT's ( :wh :bum Yes i know running different tyres and cheap one at that, but they were the same Od and all i could afford at the time)
Im now at a stage where the tyres will pass the MOT but id say not make it past Feb/March!?
SO the big decision is what to go for next
My criteria
1. Nice and tall to alter the gearing and try and improve MPG (bearing in mind, after getting up to date with my account/books, just worked out ive spent £4600 on diesel over the last 8 months!!)
2. Quiter would be nice (not that any landy is quiet :doh2)
3. Good mileage potential
4. Peace of mind that im not going to get stuck.
Now if im totally honest the Kumo's i have had on the front have been a lovley tyre, have worn the same rate as the BFG MT's on the 'other 110'. They are how ever a softer tyre and have less ply in the walls. think only 2 or 3?
SO although ive not have any issues with them, i think i will go back to BFG.
Maybe im being a snob or following the trend, but id say 85% of folk have BFG and rate them so they must be good, also on a shallow note i do like the look of them on a landy.
Ive just got a price on 8 BFG MT's @ 285/75/16 from my local trade supplier. Have been quoted £119.65 + VAT each!!??
So basically £1000 for the 2 sets plus £30 for my mate to fit and ballence them.

Do i go back to the At's, bearing in mind people say they are better for MPG (although im not convinced) but also run the risk of rendering the hicap useless of road, as i got stuck a few times with the AT's on.
Im a builder, so although 90% is tarmac, when i do go off road i need to know i'll be ok pulling a digger and trailer or a ton of sand across a field!!! :??
Also my big concern is buying a tyre which is taller, im not fussed about loosing a bit of width. but the taller the tyre the better MPG as far as im concerned. THe hi cap had the heavy duty rear so lots of room at back and the front will have a 2"+ lift (as hicaps always sit nose down!! :mm). so clearence is not an issue.
Im sure everyone will give different answers rendering the thread in conclusive, but if i could maybe get some accurate informaion, hopefully i will be able to make an educated guess as to what to do.

i've had a set of BFG MT's for about 3 1/2 years now still got 10mm of tread left they wear very well and they do behave quite well for such a aggressive pattern . (only thing i'd say you need to keep a touch of power on in corners in the wet ,and dont go mad if you have to stop quick in the wet;) )
and they have only let me down once and that was extreme on salisbury plain, i'm also a builder do about the same ie;trailer work and have never had a problem with them will be going back to them when the new landie needs some new boots (the old 1's are just put on for lanning now on the old 90's rims)
myself i'd pay the extra they are much quieter than the rest last twice as long and have good manners on & off road
nuff said!
cheers
paul
 
I'd have thought bearing in mind the mileage you're doing that longevity would be the issue. The bit extra you pay for BFG quality is insignificant when you consider the mileage you get out of them. Add to that the fact that their muds are pretty well behaved on the road and it's no contest.
 
I'd have thought bearing in mind the mileage you're doing that longevity would be the issue. The bit extra you pay for BFG quality is insignificant when you consider the mileage you get out of them. Add to that the fact that their muds are pretty well behaved on the road and it's no contest.

:rolleyes: thought thats what i said (though a bit more long winded ;) )
cant argue with it though if you are doing a lot of miles they make sense.
 
Back
Top