>> The rolling tune is a must if you're going to the expense of changing
>> the ECU.
>>
>> The took power readings on my car before any changes, then a second
>> run with the ecu swapped and a third run after some tuning changes.
>>
>> The change was about 20% increase at each stage. And fuel consumption
>> decreased noticably.
>
> Now THAT sounds interesting!
>
> Rich
>
> Pas d'elle yeux Rhone que nous
Rich you have a P38 right?
Don't think you'll get gains like this with a gems upgrade ECU.
Bare in mind I'd had an engine built and fitted to a 1988 classic, the new
engine wasn't tuned right.
The ECU wasn't fitted and it was running so lumpy I was surprised it was
running at all, so it was seriously down on power when it went in.
When it came out it was running 165hp at the wheels, from experience Power
Engineering and Mark Adams expalined there was approx 100hp loss through the
drivetrain on a classic rangie.
330lb/ft torque, it used to drive like a dream when it was running, but it
was such a huge effort to keep it running, imagine the unreliability of a
normal Range Rover, double it, then add the problem of having a non standard
engine with twice the power it was designed to have.....after a while the
maintainance overcame the enjoyment....I sold it, and it's the only time I
ever felt sad seeing a car drive away, I still miss it, but I don't miss the
unreliability.
Alan M