T
Tim Hobbs
Guest
>
>'course, if it's direct import photos and not scans, I dunno. Worth noting
>that glossy magazines work at 1200dpi at least, now - so a 6x4 picture, say,
>is going to be 7200x4800 pixels, which is much more than yer average camera
>does and more in fact than any digital camera. A decent scanner now may
>scan at 1200dpi real resolution, but anything less decent will be
>interpolating anyway.
>
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=270
You'll need another mortgage of course, but it can be done...
Most (good) stock photo libraries want 50mb files or thereabouts. By
implication anyone shooting 35mm has to interpolate using software.
Most of the 'non-news / sports' stuff is still done on larger formats,
albeit digitally.
--
Tim Hobbs
>'course, if it's direct import photos and not scans, I dunno. Worth noting
>that glossy magazines work at 1200dpi at least, now - so a 6x4 picture, say,
>is going to be 7200x4800 pixels, which is much more than yer average camera
>does and more in fact than any digital camera. A decent scanner now may
>scan at 1200dpi real resolution, but anything less decent will be
>interpolating anyway.
>
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=270
You'll need another mortgage of course, but it can be done...
Most (good) stock photo libraries want 50mb files or thereabouts. By
implication anyone shooting 35mm has to interpolate using software.
Most of the 'non-news / sports' stuff is still done on larger formats,
albeit digitally.
--
Tim Hobbs
