Search results

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
  1. T

    Your thoughts please

    It's still a chemical reaction though. Forgive me if I misinterpreted but I took your "filtering" as a method to stop and extract the NOx before it reached the atmosphere but not actually chemically modify it. This wouldn't work for the simple reason that there's only so much you can back up...
  2. T

    Your thoughts please

    It does specify that the nitrous oxides are removed via catalysts. Wammers is right; gases cannot be filtered out, at least certainly not without almost stopping the flow; they're reacted out. Check out Top Gear 13x05 for an interesting albeit impractical chemical method to completely remove CO2...
  3. T

    Woo Hoo

    How is that policed? Do you have to log and provide evidence of the amount you've used? Or is it just assumed that nobody will cross it unless it's obvious?
  4. T

    2002 p38 4.6 vogue overheating

    The time you most need aircon then :D
  5. T

    2002 p38 4.6 vogue overheating

    Doesn't it kick in at a temperature very close to the overheat though?
  6. T

    2002 p38 4.6 vogue overheating

    Based on the above yes, but only as a backup! I believe it uses the AC fans though rather than fitting new ones, does your P38 have AC?
  7. T

    2002 p38 4.6 vogue overheating

    The diesel
  8. T

    2002 p38 4.6 vogue overheating

    Reason 872 for it..... :D
  9. T

    2002 p38 4.6 vogue overheating

    OK it's a bit harder to maintain than that :P but I'm glad it's behaving itself at the moment :) Just get it checked at the very least as engines don't just randomly overheat every now and then, so something's on it's way out. As mentioned, sticky thermostat or fan's a likely cause. If it...
  10. T

    Woo Hoo

    Suspected as much :(
  11. T

    Woo Hoo

    What's the reasoning for it being illegal?
  12. T

    2002 p38 4.6 vogue overheating

    The cooling system on the 4.6 MUST be fully functional, especially with weather like this, or disaster will occur! It's only just suitable as it is. The good news is that it's fairly easy to maintain :)
  13. T

    Your thoughts please

    Larger engine = more fuel is only true if the engine efficiencies are the same, hence why modern cars are much more economical than their predecessors not just by virtue of having smaller engines.
  14. T

    Your thoughts please

    Haha well certainly not simple mechanically but, it ALWAYS works! My Johnson 150 was mechanically trivial but reliability was a tad iffy and it kept requiring bits of work. Not to mention the 0.5 mpg equivalent on the boat it was on :P The little Tohatsu 30 is a beautiful piece, never let me...
  15. T

    Your thoughts please

    I'm always talking about 4 stroke outboards as that's what I have, I'd never go back to 2-strokes after the simplicity of my Tohatsu :) I agree with you completely; I was going off Autotrader's figures for the 4.0 vs 4.6 which do indicate a slight improvement on the 4.6 and which I...
  16. T

    Your thoughts please

    I think you're oversimplifying things a bit there for the real world as an engine's power curve usually isn't linear (eg with boats (can you tell I love boats :P ) the fuel burn per hour - which I think is a better measure than mpg as it's independent of hills and mass etc - is usually more than...
  17. T

    Your thoughts please

    Are the ratios the same for the different boxes?
  18. T

    Your thoughts please

    To be fair, the official figures do actual indicate a slight improvement on the 4.6. I'm still bemused though as this doesn't seem to work given the engineering but there we go :P This is a question that's puzzled me for years; I used to wonder how supercars had such poor economy even when...
  19. T

    P38 Petrol vs Diesel

    So for the OP, it comes down to; Diesel with head V8 with heart You'll have to make the final choice! Best of luck :)
  20. T

    Your thoughts please

    It's the same reason that mopeds aren't amazingly efficient; they weigh about 1/10 of a car, so given the linear relationship between force and acceleration they should use 1/10 of the fuel... but they still only manage ~75mpg because they're constantly being revved to very high levels beyond...
Back
Top