R
Richard Brookman
Guest
....and Mother" <"@ {mother} @ spake unto the tribes of Usenet, saying...
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:19:15 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> If I sign a court document that contains a statement that I believe
>> to be false, I am liable to a fine or even imprisonment. So should
>> I have signed it or not?
>
> Did we talk about this? If not, it's pretty scary (very scary
> actually).
Not as such, although I recall the conversation going anywhere the beer led
it.
> One of the Court Clerks (viscious cow, bloody nice legs though) who
> was leading the training, well, involved in it anyway as they're not
> actually allowed to 'lead' as it were, suggested that although those
> who'd just sent in the cheque were due a refund, they must knowingly
> have made a false declaration of guilt - so should they face far more
> serious charges as a consequence...
My point exactly.
Thing is, I was brought up to know right and wrong, to respect the law, and
to believe that British justice was fundamentally fair. My two experiences
in court to date (divorce hearing and recent speeding case) have left me
with exactly the opposite impression. Not only fundamentally unfair in both
cases, but seemingly designed to take a normal decent bloke and turn him
into an raving anarchist.
--
Rich
==============================
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:19:15 -0000, "Richard Brookman"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> If I sign a court document that contains a statement that I believe
>> to be false, I am liable to a fine or even imprisonment. So should
>> I have signed it or not?
>
> Did we talk about this? If not, it's pretty scary (very scary
> actually).
Not as such, although I recall the conversation going anywhere the beer led
it.
> One of the Court Clerks (viscious cow, bloody nice legs though) who
> was leading the training, well, involved in it anyway as they're not
> actually allowed to 'lead' as it were, suggested that although those
> who'd just sent in the cheque were due a refund, they must knowingly
> have made a false declaration of guilt - so should they face far more
> serious charges as a consequence...
My point exactly.
Thing is, I was brought up to know right and wrong, to respect the law, and
to believe that British justice was fundamentally fair. My two experiences
in court to date (divorce hearing and recent speeding case) have left me
with exactly the opposite impression. Not only fundamentally unfair in both
cases, but seemingly designed to take a normal decent bloke and turn him
into an raving anarchist.
--
Rich
==============================
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.