Series 3 The Ultimate Series Daily Driver

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
My son is swapping his good but rusty focus for a series. The ford costs £9 per day in town, the series is ULEZ exempt and with decent rust proofing means no replacement cost, reducing the TCO even further.
 
Series 2a with petrol was no more than 20mpg and 200tdi 30mpg regardless how you drive it. V8 petrol even worse.
Not sure why you need to budget 30k for a daily driver.
I think in the winter you would still get fed up with it.
Have a cheap daily and that way you can enjoy your Land Rovers when you want to, not when you have to.
Unless escaping a ULEZ the above is best. And if landy need to be off the road a bit for some repair it is not a problem
 
A series is fun as a toy
Used as a daily I can see the fun wearing off very quickly

I dont think the series diesels are ulez exempt?
 
Should be as long as historic tax class
My mistake, I have just checked and yes it is foc, but sadly not from the congestion charge.

Screen Shot 2023-05-18 at 19.01.29.png
 
My mistake, I have just checked and yes it is foc, but sadly not from the congestion charge.

View attachment 288513
Congestion charge zone is tiny, about a square mile of Central London, and, as your link shows, doesn't operate after 6pm.

I have been driving in and around London since I could drive at all, and I have never entered the congestion charging zone during hours of operation. So I can't see it being a problem except for people who need to take a vehicle to work in the zone.
 
Congestion charge zone is tiny, about a square mile of Central London, and, as your link shows, doesn't operate after 6pm.

I have been driving in and around London since I could drive at all, and I have never entered the congestion charging zone during hours of operation. So I can't see it being a problem except for people who need to take a vehicle to work in the zone.
I’ve been primarily in London for the first few months and I’ll admit I’ve never had an issue with congestion zone as generally if I’m going that central will take the Tube
 
Umm, about ten square miles!
Fair enough. I have never measured it. But I do know I have never needed to enter it.
Driving to my mate's place in the Ditch, you see the warning signs along the Euston Rd, but I always go along the 501 ringroad, so no need to turn right.

It may have been extended, for all I know, I don't think I have been up there in a car for about 3 years.
 
Fair enough. I have never measured it. But I do know I have never needed to enter it.
Driving to my mate's place in the Ditch, you see the warning signs along the Euston Rd, but I always go along the 501 ringroad, so no need to turn right.

It may have been extended, for all I know, I don't think I have been up there in a car for about 3 years.
Yes, I think it was expanded a while back. The daughter is one problem, she lives in it, works in it, and if we want to go out that'll be in it too. Another problem is that if I've got something to do up there I do actually like driving in central, especially in decent weather roof off in the lightweight because you get to see the architecture better. It's a pretty nice city.
 
Yes, I think it was expanded a while back. The daughter is one problem, she lives in it, works in it, and if we want to go out that'll be in it too. Another problem is that if I've got something to do up there I do actually like driving in central, especially in decent weather roof off in the lightweight because you get to see the architecture better. It's a pretty nice city.
It is a problem if a relative lives in it.

Which reminds me, I am staying one night next month with my daughter in Bristol, which has just introduced an LEZ.
I need to check if my car is compliant, and if not, how to pay.
I understand the rationale for these schemes, but the inconsistency is irritating, it would be better if the same rules applied to all urban areas.
My daughter's own car pays the charge where she lives, but is compliant in London. Strange.
 
I know this is very specific, but I was wondering if anyone has a similar build and what the fuel economy is like?
Can't see why the fuel mileage would be much different to a Tdi Defender. And they do about 20-25 on diesel, maybe over 30 if you drive like there is an egg under the accelerator, and never go over 60 mph.

Series 2a with petrol was no more than 20mpg and 200tdi 30mpg regardless how you drive it.


I wouldn't be worrying too much about fuel economy. If it is a diesel it will do about the same regardless of what configuration it is in. I have come the conclusion that the aerodynamics (and speed) make far more difference than anything else.


1684837809062.png

^^ 110 hardtop with a disco transfer box and disco 200tdi, running 265/75 Bfg AT

1684837862911.png

^^ 90 hardtop, TD5, standard drivetrain, running 265/75 Bfg AT (ignore the best MPG that is an error)

1684837913368.png


^^ 88 series 3 softop, 2.25 diesel with OD, running 7.50 Michelin XZL

As you can see there is not that much difference between any of them and they are all averaged over a long time (especially the 110). With an old land rover there is much more important things to worry about than MPG ad if you are worried about MPG the easiest way to improve it is alter your driving style rather than modify the vehicle.

The 110 above (1989) was my daily for 13 years before the engine fire, then the td5 above became my daily and once rebuilt the 110 will be back as a daily drive, I am doing about 30k a year so don't listen to anyone who says they cannot be a perfectly usable daily drive.
 
I wouldn't be worrying too much about fuel economy. If it is a diesel it will do about the same regardless of what configuration it is in. I have come the conclusion that the aerodynamics (and speed) make far more difference than anything else.


View attachment 288866
^^ 110 hardtop with a disco transfer box and disco 200tdi, running 265/75 Bfg AT

View attachment 288867
^^ 90 hardtop, TD5, standard drivetrain, running 265/75 Bfg AT (ignore the best MPG that is an error)

View attachment 288868

^^ 88 series 3 softop, 2.25 diesel with OD, running 7.50 Michelin XZL

As you can see there is not that much difference between any of them and they are all averaged over a long time (especially the 110). With an old land rover there is much more important things to worry about than MPG ad if you are worried about MPG the easiest way to improve it is alter your driving style rather than modify the vehicle.

The 110 above (1989) was my daily for 13 years before the engine fire, then the td5 above became my daily and once rebuilt the 110 will be back as a daily drive, I am doing about 30k a year so don't listen to anyone who says they cannot be a perfectly usable daily drive.
Agree entirely.

The beauty of a Series now is that you save more on the free tax, no MOT, and cheaper insurance than you spend on fuel.

Unless you drive more than about 10k a year.
 
Below is the website I use to track my MPG and you can see everyone else's on there as well so if you are really worried about it you can have a look at the link below and see real world MPG of different land rovers and you will see they are about the same!

https://www.fuelly.com/car/land_rover
 
It is like the argument for electric cars. " I am getting an electric car and it will save me a fortune on fuel ". Forgetting the car will cost thousands more than the same petrol car which would run for years on the extra money spent and then some years down the line will need a costly new battery while a looked after fuel car will keep going.
Don't get me wrong there is a place for electric and that is in big cities and towns to lower pollution of fuel vehicles which are pottering around their engines never working enough to get cat's, ect working properly.
As for hybrids, They are just a petrol engine hauling a battery/motor around or a battery/motor hauling a petrol motor about.
Felt like a bit of a rant today.:)
 
Back
Top