D
David G. Bell
Guest
On Friday, in article
<[email protected]>
[email protected] "Austin Shackles" wrote:
> On or around Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:08:45 +0100, "David French"
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> now that's something I didn't know. I'm not actually too displeased with
> >> the 64Kb ISDN dialup, I'm just ****ed off that it costs considerably more
> >> than broadband, albeit in fact, for 512Kb contended at 50:1, the actual
> >> guaranteed max service I get from this'n (128Kb) is in fact better.
> >
> >With Zen I've never had contention problems. If you clock a download and
> >work out the throughput, it's reliably 512Kbps, providing of course the
> >thing at the other end is up to it.
>
> I suspect that when everyone has broadband, this will end up being the
> limiting factor; server speed and server connection speed will govern how
> fast things happen. After all, that's where there are likely to be
> bottlenecks.
I hope websites don't start relying on the high speed.
I think the big advantage is that the connection is always live, without
tying up a phone line that could be used for a voice call. Unless you
do want live video, I don't think contention will be a problem for most
of us. Start a file download, and leave it to run.
(We drive Land Rovers -- we're not the sort of people who hurry)
--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.
"History shows that the Singularity started when Sir Tim Berners-Lee
was bitten by a radioactive spider."
<[email protected]>
[email protected] "Austin Shackles" wrote:
> On or around Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:08:45 +0100, "David French"
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
> >"Austin Shackles" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> now that's something I didn't know. I'm not actually too displeased with
> >> the 64Kb ISDN dialup, I'm just ****ed off that it costs considerably more
> >> than broadband, albeit in fact, for 512Kb contended at 50:1, the actual
> >> guaranteed max service I get from this'n (128Kb) is in fact better.
> >
> >With Zen I've never had contention problems. If you clock a download and
> >work out the throughput, it's reliably 512Kbps, providing of course the
> >thing at the other end is up to it.
>
> I suspect that when everyone has broadband, this will end up being the
> limiting factor; server speed and server connection speed will govern how
> fast things happen. After all, that's where there are likely to be
> bottlenecks.
I hope websites don't start relying on the high speed.
I think the big advantage is that the connection is always live, without
tying up a phone line that could be used for a voice call. Unless you
do want live video, I don't think contention will be a problem for most
of us. Start a file download, and leave it to run.
(We drive Land Rovers -- we're not the sort of people who hurry)
--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.
"History shows that the Singularity started when Sir Tim Berners-Lee
was bitten by a radioactive spider."