OT Spam posts ??

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
H

Hirsty's

Guest
Is it me my server or is the group as a whole getting a lot of spam posts in
the last few days ??

--


" ..... it is the provenence of knowledge to speak, and it is the privelage
of wisdom to listen"


 
Hirsty's composed the following;:
> Is it me my server or is the group as a whole getting a lot of spam posts
> in the last few days ??


NTL newsgroups and servers _always_ get ****-loads of spam.

News.individual.net gets very, very few in comparison.

Nin is free to use, but you do need to sign up for it, and it's a text only
newsserver.

I use Nin for 'decent' groups and NTL for por ... er .... binaries .. ;)


--
Paul ...
http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php
(8(!) Homer Rules ... ;)
"A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using."

 

"Paul - wrote after..
> Hirsty's composed the following;:
>> Is it me my server or is the group as a whole getting a lot of spam posts
>> in the last few days ??

>
> NTL newsgroups and servers _always_ get ****-loads of spam.
>
> News.individual.net gets very, very few in comparison.
>
> Nin is free to use, but you do need to sign up for it, and it's a text
> only newsserver.
>
> I use Nin for 'decent' groups and NTL for por ... er .... binaries .. ;)
>

Quite agree, I use News.Individual.net for most Ngs but still use the
useless BT for binaries (on which they still miss a lot of posts)

Incidentally, isn't it great the way the Police were able to get that chap
who "Trolled" the grieving relatives of the tsunami victims and within 24
hours lock him up whilst awaiting trial.
So they can do it, so why can't they do it to all UK trolls? Is it just the
will?

--
Regards
Bob
In Runnymede, 17 miles West of London


 
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:21:32 -0000, Bob Hobden wrote:

> Incidentally, isn't it great the way the Police were able to get
> that chap who "Trolled" the grieving relatives of the tsunami
> victims and within 24 hours lock him up whilst awaiting trial.
> So they can do it, so why can't they do it to all UK trolls? Is it
> just the will?


Maybe he wasn't to bright (goes with out saying almost) and didn't
cover his tracks very well or at all.

--
Cheers [email protected]
Dave. pam is missing e-mail



 
Bob Hobden composed the following;:
> "Paul - wrote after..
>> Hirsty's composed the following;:
>>> Is it me my server or is the group as a whole getting a lot of spam
>>> posts in the last few days ??

>>
>> NTL newsgroups and servers _always_ get ****-loads of spam.
>>
>> News.individual.net gets very, very few in comparison.
>>
>> Nin is free to use, but you do need to sign up for it, and it's a text
>> only newsserver.
>>
>> I use Nin for 'decent' groups and NTL for por ... er .... binaries .. ;)
>>

> Quite agree, I use News.Individual.net for most Ngs but still use the
> useless BT for binaries (on which they still miss a lot of posts)
>
> Incidentally, isn't it great the way the Police were able to get that chap
> who "Trolled" the grieving relatives of the tsunami victims and within 24
> hours lock him up whilst awaiting trial.


Ho yuss .. bastard wants shooting .. though I expect he'll claim insanity or
somesuch and get off lightly.

> So they can do it, so why can't they do it to all UK trolls? Is it just
> the will?


No, it's because what he did caused real suffering and is illegal. He was
impersonating the Home Office, I believe.

'They' could, but Trolls are just morons who need to see their name in
print, and there are no laws, as such, against what they do. If they do
cause real suffering, or libel or somesuch, then maybe there is something
that can be done, but it would probably be a personal case, not a criminal
case.


--
Paul ...
http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php
(8(!) Homer Rules ... ;)
"A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using."

 
On Tuesday, in article
<[email protected]>
[email protected] "Dave Liquorice" wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:21:32 -0000, Bob Hobden wrote:
>
> > Incidentally, isn't it great the way the Police were able to get
> > that chap who "Trolled" the grieving relatives of the tsunami
> > victims and within 24 hours lock him up whilst awaiting trial.
> > So they can do it, so why can't they do it to all UK trolls? Is it
> > just the will?

>
> Maybe he wasn't to bright (goes with out saying almost) and didn't
> cover his tracks very well or at all.


And maybe one of his victims knew what they were doing, and likely would
be angry enough to do it.



--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

Wrought under license granted by Her Majesty's Apostropher Royal AD MMIV
 

"Paul - wrote after...
> Bob Hobden composed the following;:
>> Incidentally, isn't it great the way the Police were able to get that
>> chap
>> who "Trolled" the grieving relatives of the tsunami victims and within 24
>> hours lock him up whilst awaiting trial.

>
> Ho yuss .. bastard wants shooting .. though I expect he'll claim insanity
> or somesuch and get off lightly.
>
>> So they can do it, so why can't they do it to all UK trolls? Is it just
>> the will?

>
> No, it's because what he did caused real suffering and is illegal. He was
> impersonating the Home Office, I believe.
>
> 'They' could, but Trolls are just morons who need to see their name in
> print, and there are no laws, as such, against what they do. If they do
> cause real suffering, or libel or somesuch, then maybe there is something
> that can be done, but it would probably be a personal case, not a criminal
> case.
>


I would have thought the anti-social behaviour laws in the UK covered it.
It's just another form of jobbish behaviour.

--
Regards
Bob
In Runnymede, 17 miles West of London


 
Bob Hobden composed the following;:
> "Paul - wrote after...
>> Bob Hobden composed the following;:
>>> Incidentally, isn't it great the way the Police were able to get that
>>> chap
>>> who "Trolled" the grieving relatives of the tsunami victims and within
>>> 24 hours lock him up whilst awaiting trial.

>>
>> Ho yuss .. bastard wants shooting .. though I expect he'll claim insanity
>> or somesuch and get off lightly.
>>
>>> So they can do it, so why can't they do it to all UK trolls? Is it just
>>> the will?

>>
>> No, it's because what he did caused real suffering and is illegal. He
>> was impersonating the Home Office, I believe.
>>
>> 'They' could, but Trolls are just morons who need to see their name in
>> print, and there are no laws, as such, against what they do. If they do
>> cause real suffering, or libel or somesuch, then maybe there is something
>> that can be done, but it would probably be a personal case, not a
>> criminal case.
>>

>
> I would have thought the anti-social behaviour laws in the UK covered it.
> It's just another form of jobbish behaviour.


I dunno. ;)

Be nice to think so, but frankly, they don't harm anyone really. After all,
no-one has to read a trolls comments ever.


--
Paul ...
http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php
(8(!) Homer Rules ... ;)
"A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using."

 
Back
Top