OT but weird

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
S

StaffBull

Guest
I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed of
the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out of
kilter!!
Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!


 
"StaffBull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed

of
> the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out of
> kilter!!
> Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!


Credible source, or bloke down the pub?


--
Smorgo (Steve Morgan)
Hello: '01 VFR 800 FI, '86 V8 110
Goodbye: '01 NT650V
E-Mail address is spam-trapped. Use my first name at wormpurple dot com


 
Smorgo wrote:
> "StaffBull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed

>
> of
>
>>the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out of
>>kilter!!
>> Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!

>
>
> Credible source, or bloke down the pub?
>
>


There was something on the news about the earth was knocked of it's axis
by an inch...
 
"StaffBull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed
>of the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out
>of kilter!!
> Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!


Well I got up to the Lakes today ok using sat nav for part of the trip. It
did say I'd got there when I was actually 2 doors away if that counts.

Lee D.


 
bloke in work picked it up off the net somewhere, so dunno
"Smorgo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "StaffBull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed

> of
>> the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out of
>> kilter!!
>> Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!

>
> Credible source, or bloke down the pub?
>
>
> --
> Smorgo (Steve Morgan)
> Hello: '01 VFR 800 FI, '86 V8 110
> Goodbye: '01 NT650V
> E-Mail address is spam-trapped. Use my first name at wormpurple dot com
>
>



 

"StaffBull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed

of
> the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out of
> kilter!!
> Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!
>
>


Hope no one tries to nuke us !! :))


 

"StaffBull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed
>of the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out
>of kilter!!
> Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!
>

My Sat nav (etrex) has worked fine all day to OS maps on Kinder.
I wasn't the one who got lost in the mist and rain.

Gerry


 
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:05:43 -0000, Smorgo wrote:

> Credible source, or bloke down the pub?


Have a dig on the web, a scientist from US Geological Survey seems to
be the main source, nothing on the USGS website though. As for GPS the
satellites are fine it's just that the world isn't where it's supposed
to be.

--
Cheers [email protected]
Dave. pam is missing e-mail



 
> I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed
of
> the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out of
> kilter!!
> Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!
>
>

Mine was about 1/4 mile NE out of position coming back from work tonight.

Any one else out of position??


 
Found this on www.pocketgps.co.uk

seems guy at work was not talking out of his arse!!

Makes you think - what next?


Following on from the worlds worst Tsunami's with a death toll figure
furiously approaching 80,000, US based scientists from the Geological Survey
(USGS) have said "the quake that set off the wall of water had moved
tectonic plates beneath the Indian Ocean by up to 30 meters (100 feet),
causing the Earth to wobble on its axis and permanently shortening the day
by a fraction of a second. " which is a quote from Reuters. Science.orf.at
in a Google Translation also says "The heavy earthquake before the coast of
Sumatra has substantial geological effects. Thus the tectonic plates under
the Indian ocean did not only shift experts according to around
approximately 30 meters. Also the earth rotation could accelerate itself
around three microseconds per day". This could adversely affect the Earth,
satellites and GPS over a long period of time.




"StaffBull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed
>of the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out
>of kilter!!
> Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!
>



 

Might miss Anglesey then!! apparently we were a priority target( dunno how
high in the scheme of things) in the cold war due to the two Nuclear power
stations in close proximity and the RAF base
gives you a nice cosy feeling!


"Erik-Jan Geniets" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Hirsty's wrote:
>
>> >

>>
>> Hope no one tries to nuke us !! :))

>
> Why not. If they try now they will probably mis......
> ...and hit me instead......;-(
>
> Kind regards,
> Erik-Jan.
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.fotograaf.com/trooper



 


StaffBull wrote:
> Found this on www.pocketgps.co.uk
>
> seems guy at work was not talking out of his arse!!
>
> Makes you think - what next?
>
>
> Following on from the worlds worst Tsunami's with a death toll figure
> furiously approaching 80,000, US based scientists from the Geological Survey
> (USGS) have said "the quake that set off the wall of water had moved
> tectonic plates beneath the Indian Ocean by up to 30 meters (100 feet),
> causing the Earth to wobble on its axis and permanently shortening the day
> by a fraction of a second. " which is a quote from Reuters. Science.orf.at
> in a Google Translation also says "The heavy earthquake before the coast of
> Sumatra has substantial geological effects. Thus the tectonic plates under
> the Indian ocean did not only shift experts according to around
> approximately 30 meters. Also the earth rotation could accelerate itself
> around three microseconds per day". This could adversely affect the Earth,
> satellites and GPS over a long period of time.
>
>
>
>
> "StaffBull" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational speed
>>of the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out
>>of kilter!!
>>Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!
>>

>
>
>

Strange that though. I thought I recognized the back of head. Just hope
we don't get anymore like these or else christmas will be coming too
early next year.
--
-
Thank You

John N Oakes
Manchester, England.

=============================
! doyeneatzetnetdotcodotuk !
! Landrover 90 2286cc 1984 !
! Atari/Win/Mac User !
=============================

 
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 01:24:11 +0000, John Oakes wrote:

> Just hope we don't get anymore like these or else christmas will be
> coming too early next year.


Well it will be about 1mS earlier anyway but any excuse for the shops
to start flogging Christmas stuf in August I guess. B-)

--
Cheers [email protected]
Dave. pam is missing e-mail



 
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:55:25 -0000, StaffBull wrote:

> Makes you think - what next?


Big metorite impact? There are 654 known Potentially
Hazardous Asteroids, PHAs. Space rocks larger than approximately 100m
that can come closer to Earth than 0.05 AU. An AU is the distance
between the Earth and Sun and also note "known" quite a number are
detected *after* they have come within closest approach...

As far as known PHAs are concerned it's been a quiet couple of months,
only 2 in Nov and 2 in Dec, closest was 5LD on the 24th Dec (Earth
Moon distance or 0.0128AU).

--
Cheers [email protected]
Dave. pam is missing e-mail



 
On Thursday, in article <[email protected]>
[email protected] "StaffBull" wrote:

> Might miss Anglesey then!! apparently we were a priority target( dunno how
> high in the scheme of things) in the cold war due to the two Nuclear power
> stations in close proximity and the RAF base
> gives you a nice cosy feeling!


There were always far more targets than missiles, with vastly different
priorities.

Unless RAF Valley could take a fully loaded B-52, it'd be pretty low on
the list. The same with nuclear reactors; they're not an immediate
threat.


--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

Wrought under license granted by Her Majesty's Apostropher Royal AD MMIV
 
"SimonJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > I have heard that the recent Tsunami has resulted in the rotational

speed
> of
> > the world shifting slightly and has knocked the sat nav satellites out

of
> > kilter!!
> > Dunno by how much, but it goes to show the size of the quake!!
> >
> >

> Mine was about 1/4 mile NE out of position coming back from work tonight.
>


And with that knowledge, how many hours sleep did you get last night?
Personally I had the full eight hours, but some may feel that the sky is
about to fall in on them. To whom..... hahahahaha!!!

Steve


 
I think RAF valley is OK to take any aircraft - cant remember seeing the
B52's at the shows but I was dragged along when I was a kid and was
completely uninterested as my old man worked there for 30 odd years.
""David G. Bell"" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thursday, in article <[email protected]>
> [email protected] "StaffBull" wrote:
>
>> Might miss Anglesey then!! apparently we were a priority target( dunno
>> how
>> high in the scheme of things) in the cold war due to the two Nuclear
>> power
>> stations in close proximity and the RAF base
>> gives you a nice cosy feeling!

>
> There were always far more targets than missiles, with vastly different
> priorities.
>
> Unless RAF Valley could take a fully loaded B-52, it'd be pretty low on
> the list. The same with nuclear reactors; they're not an immediate
> threat.
>
>
> --
> David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.
>
> Wrought under license granted by Her Majesty's Apostropher Royal AD MMIV



 
I remember seeing a program on that on discovery - one came down in Siberia
in about 1908 I think - made a hell of a mess!!!


"Dave Liquorice" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:55:25 -0000, StaffBull wrote:
>
>> Makes you think - what next?

>
> Big metorite impact? There are 654 known Potentially
> Hazardous Asteroids, PHAs. Space rocks larger than approximately 100m
> that can come closer to Earth than 0.05 AU. An AU is the distance
> between the Earth and Sun and also note "known" quite a number are
> detected *after* they have come within closest approach...
>
> As far as known PHAs are concerned it's been a quiet couple of months,
> only 2 in Nov and 2 in Dec, closest was 5LD on the 24th Dec (Earth
> Moon distance or 0.0128AU).
>
> --
> Cheers [email protected]
> Dave. pam is missing e-mail
>
>
>



 
StaffBull wrote:
> I remember seeing a program on that on discovery - one came down in Siberia
> in about 1908 I think - made a hell of a mess!!!

Tunguska, 1912, missed Western Europe by 4 hours.

The Asian earthquake was roughly the equivalent of 450 megatonnes of
TNT, If the latest asteroid predicted to pass us by in 2029 actually
hit, it would be around 2000 MT.. Thats some bang !

Steve
 
Back
Top