On or around Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:17:11 +0100, MVP
<mr.nice@*nospam*softhome.net> enlightened us thusly:
>On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:43:21 +0100, Austin Shackles
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On or around Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:49:37 GMT, "Robbiedoo"
>><[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>>
>>>Thanks Staffbull
>>>
>>>Actually I prefer the RR so I'll take a look and see but you have worried me
>>>a little with this slipped liner business. I suppose there's no pattern to
>>>it, nor can you tell when it is likely to happen or better still prevent it?
>>
>>bigger engines are more prone, ISTR. 3.9 less likely than 4.6, style of
>>fing.
>
>If the disco's are less prone than the rr's then can the rr ecu be
>changed for or altered to similar to, the disco ecu? thus solving the
>problem.
that's a good point, and I don't know the answer. The system is nominally
the same, AFAIK. 'course, the problem may be to do with other aspects like
cooling - I know Sister's BF had loads of problems with cooling on his 3.9
RR, which he solved eventually by removing the aircon radiator - presumably,
though, that disables the aircon.
--
Austin Shackles.
www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
"For millions of years, mankind lived just like the animals. Then
something happened which unleashed the power of our imagination -
we learned to talk." Pink Floyd (1994)
