Disco - decisions advice please

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
D

Dadio

Guest
I will try and stay coherent.... a bit long, sorry, but no-one else to talk
to (how sad is that!).

I have a 1995 3.9 V8 ES Auto which I bought with 12000 on the clock in 1996.
Since then I have worked it pretty hard (tow 2 tons all over the place) and
it now has done 145,000 miles.

Do I throw money at it and give it a real good sort out, or do I get rid of
it and buy another one. I do want a V8 ES Auto, it does what I need it to
do..

For around £6000 I could possibly buy a similar aged Disco with fewer miles
(70,000?)
It would cost me nearer £20,000 for a significantly later model and that is
serious money.

To spend, say, £2000 "doing stuff" to my existing Disco is very affordable
(it deserves it) but do I risk throwing that money into a bottomless pit.

For the first few years it was serviced by Land Rover main dealer (very
expensive!) but for the past few years by my local garage and probably not
particularly thoroughly.

It has not been that well looked after but despite my lack of attention is
in pretty good condition.

Now decision time...

It needs a "thorough" service, a real good going over. The engine sounds
sweet but has a habit of stalling. I reckon it is an engine management
thing, dodgy sensor somewhere, intermittent, ok some days, big problem
others.

The suspension needs replacing, I had rear shocks renewed at 75000 but new
springs and shocks all round sounds sensible now (145000 miles remember).

Exhaust needs replacing, not sure about the cats, they are still original.

I have toyed with the idea of lpg conversion but at £2000 plus, I am not
convinced. There are Discos that come up for sale that have already had
that done, maybe that would be a better route to take. 75 pounds to fill up
my tank and do 270 miles is getting scary.

The transfer box whines, a bit like a jet engine, it all works ok, sounds a
bit as though filling it up with thick oil would shut it up (I wonder if
there is much oil in it? hmmmm.) I don't really use the car off road in the
mad mudlark sense but I do use the high and low and diff lock regularly as I
tow my trailer in some odd places so it all works. A bit of clunking from
under the engine as lumps of metal bonk into place when I reverse sounds a
bit worrying sometimes but I am used to it!

Frankly I don't mind throwing a bit of money at the car to have it properly
sorted as long as I end up with something that is going to be reliable and
give me a few more years (5+) solid use, typically 7000 miles per year now.

I have been going through the necessary mental adjustment and might be
turning into a bit of a Landy Man. With most cars you run them into the
ground, throw them away and buy another one. With my Disco a different
thought process would be to mend or replace the broken bits and keep it
going (forever?), Landy thought process not Ford thought process, is that
right? or am I deluding myself, is 200,000+ miles normal for the V8? would a
rebuild be sensible, how much, when? etc etc.

I am in South Cambridgeshire, can anyone suggest a decent independent Land
Rover garage with the necessary electronic analysis kit to do a bit of
diagnosis and tweaking without charging the excessive LR dealer rates. I
don't mind travelling a few miles for someone honest and fair dealing. The
stalling issue needs sorting. Gut reaction is that it is something simple
and silly, but boy could I be wrong.

The only rust of concern is the front off-side wheel arch. Wing is ok but
the arch as badly rotted under the plastic stone guard. A bit awkward to get
at, I am tempted to slap on a blanket of fibre glass but that would be
cheating. Is this something to give a body shop to sort out? Silly money?

I have just replaced the fan belt (one great big long one) and the brake
pads all round. I am no mechanic but it was dead easy. The bad thing was
that one front pad was down to metal (feeling guilty about that one). The
really bad thing was that the rear pads (fitted by a "proper" garage in
2002... bastards) were the wrong ones. I could not work out why the new
pads were slightly different and a bit hard to slide in and it turned out
that the new ones were ok but the old ones were for a Range Rover and had a
tiny bit notched out. They had slid too far in and gouged the drum (over a
couple of years!). If I can find the original receipt I shall take the
matter up with them even though it was a few years ago. Its amazing how
something built like a truck tolerates that, and I hadn't noticed any
braking issues, you just get used to it, shows how much better it can be to
do the work yourself (just need the ability).

Sorry, I am wandering.....

Back to the need for advice..... Do I throw money at the car that I have
had for the last 10 years or look for another one.
If I keep my existing car where is a decent mechanic in North Herts / South
Cambs who can be relied upon to do a good job for a fair price.

and so on and so on, you know what I am getting at.

Thank for listening

Les


 
so Dadio was, like...
> I will try and stay coherent.... a bit long, sorry, but no-one else
> to talk to (how sad is that!).
>
> I have a 1995 3.9 V8 ES Auto which I bought with 12000 on the clock
> in 1996. Since then I have worked it pretty hard (tow 2 tons all over
> the place) and it now has done 145,000 miles.
>
> Do I throw money at it and give it a real good sort out, or do I get
> rid of it and buy another one. I do want a V8 ES Auto, it does what
> I need it to do..


<snip>

Throw some serious money at it, get it properly sorted, and you will have
another 100,000 miles out of it. (Plus you will have a very good friend in
the mechanic you choose to do the work.) The key point in your message is
how much you like the vehicle. If you were fed up with it, it's a
no-brainer. But if you want the same vehicle, but better, do the work. If
you chopped it in and spent the money on a newer one, there would still be
problems to sort out, although perhaps not as many. Note the "perhaps".

BTW, 20 grand gets you a nearly-new Td5. Totally different ball-game. Your
6 grand would get you the very latest ES auto with low mileage and some
change over.

--
Rich
==============================
Disco 300 Tdi auto
S2a 88" SW
Tiggrr (V8 trialler)


 
In message <[email protected]>
"Dadio" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I will try and stay coherent.... a bit long, sorry, but no-one else to talk
> to (how sad is that!).
>


<snip>

> I have just replaced the fan belt (one great big long one) and the brake
> pads all round. I am no mechanic but it was dead easy. The bad thing was
> that one front pad was down to metal (feeling guilty about that one). The
> really bad thing was that the rear pads (fitted by a "proper" garage in
> 2002... bastards) were the wrong ones. I could not work out why the new
> pads were slightly different and a bit hard to slide in and it turned out
> that the new ones were ok but the old ones were for a Range Rover and had a
> tiny bit notched out. They had slid too far in and gouged the drum (over a
> couple of years!). If I can find the original receipt I shall take the
> matter up with them even though it was a few years ago. Its amazing how
> something built like a truck tolerates that, and I hadn't noticed any
> braking issues, you just get used to it, shows how much better it can be to
> do the work yourself (just need the ability).
>


Before taking it up with them it's worth noting that Range Rover Classic
and Discovery I rear pads are all the same (optional sensor wire aside).

<snip>


Richard
--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Helping keep Land Rovers on and off the road to annoy the Lib Dems
 


> <snip>
>
> > really bad thing was that the rear pads (fitted by a "proper" garage in
> > 2002... bastards) were the wrong ones. I could not work out why the new
> > pads were slightly different and a bit hard to slide in and it turned

out
> > that the new ones were ok but the old ones were for a Range Rover and

had a
> > tiny bit notched out. They had slid too far in and gouged the drum

(over a
> > couple of years!). If I can find the original receipt I shall take the
> > matter up with them even though it was a few years ago. Its amazing how
> > something built like a truck tolerates that, and I hadn't noticed any
> > braking issues, you just get used to it, shows how much better it can be

to
> > do the work yourself (just need the ability).
> >

>
> Before taking it up with them it's worth noting that Range Rover Classic
> and Discovery I rear pads are all the same (optional sensor wire aside).
>
> <snip>


Thanks Richard, the new pads (the correct ones) for my Discovery are clearly
different from the ones that had been fitted. The "wrong" ones had a bit
notched out at each side and the pad area was slightly smaller as well.
Apart from that they are virtually the same. The new rear ones supplied did
have a sensor wire which I have snipped off as my Disco does not use that.
The notch enabled the pads to slip slightly further in towards the hub than
they should, the pad rotating as it goes as one side hangs up. The result
is a gouged hub and extremely uneven wear. The inside face of the disc has
only been making contact on the outer part of the circumference.
You get used to things. I thought the poor braking over the past few years
was a "feature" now with new pads it does not seem to dip as much at the
front with heavy braking as the rear brakes are doing a better job.

Les


 
Dadio wrote:

>><snip>
>>
>>>really bad thing was that the rear pads (fitted by a "proper" garage in
>>>2002... bastards) were the wrong ones. I could not work out why the new
>>>pads were slightly different and a bit hard to slide in and it turned

>
> out
>
>>>that the new ones were ok but the old ones were for a Range Rover and

>
> had a
>
>>>tiny bit notched out. They had slid too far in and gouged the drum

>
> (over a
>
>>>couple of years!). If I can find the original receipt I shall take the
>>>matter up with them even though it was a few years ago. Its amazing how
>>>something built like a truck tolerates that, and I hadn't noticed any
>>>braking issues, you just get used to it, shows how much better it can be

>
> to
>
>>>do the work yourself (just need the ability).
>>>

>>
>>Before taking it up with them it's worth noting that Range Rover Classic
>>and Discovery I rear pads are all the same (optional sensor wire aside).
>>
>><snip>

>
>
> Thanks Richard, the new pads (the correct ones) for my Discovery are clearly
> different from the ones that had been fitted. The "wrong" ones had a bit
> notched out at each side and the pad area was slightly smaller as well.
> Apart from that they are virtually the same. The new rear ones supplied did
> have a sensor wire which I have snipped off as my Disco does not use that.
> The notch enabled the pads to slip slightly further in towards the hub than
> they should, the pad rotating as it goes as one side hangs up. The result
> is a gouged hub and extremely uneven wear. The inside face of the disc has
> only been making contact on the outer part of the circumference.
> You get used to things. I thought the poor braking over the past few years
> was a "feature" now with new pads it does not seem to dip as much at the
> front with heavy braking as the rear brakes are doing a better job.
>
> Les


I'm not familiar with the Disco setup but assume it's very similar to
RRC. Correct me if I'm wrong!

Did you have the springs installed which fit between the OD of the pad
backing plate and the split pins? If missing the pad can rotate in the
calliper and the backing plate corner digs into the hub. If left too
long you can part off the disc from the hub!
 
Back
Top