In message <
[email protected]>
Lee_D <
[email protected]> wrote:
> During stardate Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:56:43 +0100, Dave Piggin
> <[email protected]> uttered the imortal words:
>
>
> >Hardest part is lifting the body to access for welding, which
> >incidentally cannot be done as efficiently as at manufacture.
>
> Is this feasible on a 90 or 110?
>
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D03300C
>
> Should save alot of work.
>
>
> Lee D
That's step one.......... The problem with fitting a crossmember
without extensions to a 90/110 is access to ends of the chassis
rails and top of the member for welding. The joint between the chassis
rail and crossmember on a Defender is quite deeply recessed and access
is pretty restricted. Doing a 90 with extensions is dead easy, as the
joint for the extensions is at the bottom of the curve between the axle
and rear, so though access to the top of the rail is a bit restricted
there is nothing much in the way.
On 110's it goes right up to the first crossmember (about
2tf 6in, perhaps a bit more), but you have to remove the tank, rollbar
(if fitted) and tow hitch (if fitted). If its a Station Wagon the rear
seats need to be folded up out of the way too. And then you have to
make sure the tank and roll bar all line up before welding up. Its a
lot of work, around a full day for someone who has done it before,
probably one and a half to two days for the first attempt.
Richard
--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
Running a business in a Microsoft free environment - it can be done
Powered by Risc-OS - you won't get a virus from us!!
Boycott the Yorkshire Dales - No Play, No Pay