Clever stuff this Silicone Fluid.
I wish I could react in a tenth of a second.
S.
it worked exceedingly well in the rr ,and does in the fl its only the reduction in rwd that gives it an issue ,it works harder so life is reduced compared to rrOne of the main issue with the VCU technology, as highlighted by this and other threads is that nobody really knows what its operating perimeters are. When does it cut in / out, how much drive front to back. It is this inherent lack of sophistication that has consigned it to motoring history - how can we have a conversation comparing experience when say my VCU is used and yours is recon and the next is brand new OE. More modern systems remove most of this speculation. My experience of VCU drive is that it will engage and get you out of trouble but without the finesse of modern systems, which work better both on and off tarmac. I say this as someone who hates stuff like parking sensors and electric handbrakes, just more to go wrong, but credit where it is due. Just my take.
why would it be better than diff lock in your opinion ,i know why i think it has meritsThats why, in some ways, it is better than difflock.. The electronic version is even better, because it takes into account acceleration, lateral G force and a few other bits as well.
why would it be better than diff lock in your opinion ,i know why i think it has merits
difflock has no reaction time just physical lock ,the advantage is having drive to both axles while still been able to steer without geting excessive wind up ,though through viscous the system has allways some wind up but manageable by the vehicle running gear until it stiffens excessively or seizes
yes it does, James - you have to remember to engage difflock :rolly:.
a VCU or an electronic version can be always "engaged", without suffering wind-up.
the whole point of diff lock is to engage it before getting stuck as its better at keeping you going that getting you out ,god off road drivers would know that ,so point still stands , reactionary diff locking systems as used in tractors etc since the 80s is obviously better as steering isnt effected and torque distribution can be altered per wheel and can apply to all 4 wheels , t/c is good but only works on braking opposite wheel so is limited somewhatyes it does, James - you have to remember to engage difflock :rolly:.
a VCU or an electronic version can be always "engaged", without suffering wind-up.
it worked exceedingly well in the rr ,and does in the fl its only the reduction in rwd that gives it an issue ,it works harder so life is reduced compared to rr
only when it stiffens which is bought into been quicker through reduction in drive to rear wheels
yes i would too ,vcu is better than a center diff lock but not as good as more sophisticated system
I think we can all aggree on that. Having seen a D3 in action I'm pretty convinced of the merits of the newer systems. But for the price, te FL1 has impressive capability.
Agree - its the ability to switch and have best of both worlds that I'm after.